Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Midwifery students’ experiences with practicing the midwifery philosophy of care during clinical practice in the hospital settings: a qualitative systematic review protocol

View through CrossRef
Objective: This review aims to synthesize qualitative evidence on the experiences of midwifery students with providing care aligned with the midwifery philosophy of care during clinical practice in hospital settings. Introduction: Midwifery education, guided by the global standards of the International Confederation of Midwives, integrates theoretical knowledge with clinical practice to prepare students for delivering midwifery philosophy of care. However, implementing the principles of this philosophy of care, such as promoting physiological childbirth, woman-centered care, and shared decision-making, can be challenging within hospital settings. Eligibility criteria: Published qualitative studies conducted since 2005 reporting qualitative data on midwifery students’ (aged 18 years or older) experiences of providing midwifery care in hospital settings during their clinical practice will be included. Students’ experiences may encompass facilitators or barriers for practicing the principles of the midwifery philosophy of care. Studies conducted in Europe, New Zealand, and Australia will be considered, as these are settings where midwifery associations advocate for the midwifery philosophy of care in hospital environments. Methods: A systematic search will be conducted in CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PubMed, Embase.com, ERIC (Ovid), and Web of Science Core Collection for studies published in any language from 2005 to the present. Unpublished and gray literature will be sought through Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. The JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence will be followed for study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, synthesis through meta-aggregation, and assessment of confidence in the findings (ConQual approach). All steps will be performed independently by 2 reviewers. Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024625908
Title: Midwifery students’ experiences with practicing the midwifery philosophy of care during clinical practice in the hospital settings: a qualitative systematic review protocol
Description:
Objective: This review aims to synthesize qualitative evidence on the experiences of midwifery students with providing care aligned with the midwifery philosophy of care during clinical practice in hospital settings.
Introduction: Midwifery education, guided by the global standards of the International Confederation of Midwives, integrates theoretical knowledge with clinical practice to prepare students for delivering midwifery philosophy of care.
However, implementing the principles of this philosophy of care, such as promoting physiological childbirth, woman-centered care, and shared decision-making, can be challenging within hospital settings.
Eligibility criteria: Published qualitative studies conducted since 2005 reporting qualitative data on midwifery students’ (aged 18 years or older) experiences of providing midwifery care in hospital settings during their clinical practice will be included.
Students’ experiences may encompass facilitators or barriers for practicing the principles of the midwifery philosophy of care.
Studies conducted in Europe, New Zealand, and Australia will be considered, as these are settings where midwifery associations advocate for the midwifery philosophy of care in hospital environments.
Methods: A systematic search will be conducted in CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PubMed, Embase.
com, ERIC (Ovid), and Web of Science Core Collection for studies published in any language from 2005 to the present.
Unpublished and gray literature will be sought through Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
The JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence will be followed for study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, synthesis through meta-aggregation, and assessment of confidence in the findings (ConQual approach).
All steps will be performed independently by 2 reviewers.
Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024625908.

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
The Effect of Hard Work in Completing Midwifery Practice Reports on STIKes Kesehatan Baru Students
The Effect of Hard Work in Completing Midwifery Practice Reports on STIKes Kesehatan Baru Students
Currently the implementation of a competency-based curriculum in the Midwifery Diploma III study program has entered the professional education stage. This stage is a very importan...
What is Analytic Philosophy
What is Analytic Philosophy
Special Issue: What is Analytic PhilosophyReferencesHaaparantaG. P. Baker and P. M. S. Hacker. Frege: Logical Excavations. Oxford, Blackwell, 1984.M. Dummett. The Interpretation of...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract Introduction Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Supporting Midwifery Students During Clinical Practice: Results of a Systematic Scoping Review
Supporting Midwifery Students During Clinical Practice: Results of a Systematic Scoping Review
Background Midwifery educators are highly concerned about the quality of clinical support offered to midwifery students during clinical placement. The unpreparedness of...
Supporting Midwifery Students During Clinical Practice: Results of a Systematic Scoping Review (Preprint)
Supporting Midwifery Students During Clinical Practice: Results of a Systematic Scoping Review (Preprint)
BACKGROUND Midwifery educators are highly concerned about the quality of clinical support offered to midwifery students during clinical placement. The unpre...
Use of Personal Protective Equipment in General Practice and Ambulance settings: a rapid review
Use of Personal Protective Equipment in General Practice and Ambulance settings: a rapid review
AbstractThe use of personal protective equipment (PPE) is a cornerstone of infection prevention and control guidelines and was of increased importance during the COVID-19 pandemic....
Midwifery students' experiences of support for ethical competence
Midwifery students' experiences of support for ethical competence
Background: Midwifery students are confronted with several ethical dilemmas and challenging situations during clinical midwifery care practice. Since ethical competence of midwifer...

Back to Top