Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Efficacy and safety of tirofiban following intravenous thrombolysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background The risk of re-occlusion and inadequate reperfusion limits the efficacy of thrombolysis within 4.5 hours for acute ischemic stroke. Tirofiban, a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, has been studied as an adjunctive treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome. This meta-analysis evaluates existing evidence on the effectiveness and safety of tirofiban following thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods PubMed, Science Direct, Clinicaltrials.gov, and The Cochrane Library were searched for RCTs between 2011 and 2025. All studies included acute ischemic stroke patients, aged ≥ 18 years, NIHSS >4, who received IV thrombolysis before tirofiban administration. Endpoints included mRS score, SICH, risk of systemic bleeding, and mortality. The quality of the studies was assessed using the ROB2 tool, and risk ratios were calculated and analyzed. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251106033). Results Only five trials were included from the original articles retrieved from the searched databases. Two trials had a low risk of bias, one had some concerns, and two had a high risk of bias. Results showed a significant improvement in mRS score with IVT plus tirofiban (RR 1.32; 95% CI 1.07–1.62; p = 0.010), while also showing an increase in SICH with IVT plus tirofiban; however, the results were not significant (RR 1.86; 95% CI 0.18–19.24; p = 0.60). No difference in mortality was observed between the two groups (RR 1.06; 95% CI 0.56–2.04; p = 0.85). Conclusion IVT plus tirofiban significantly improves functional outcomes without increasing mortality despite the risk of SICH.
Title: Efficacy and safety of tirofiban following intravenous thrombolysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Description:
Abstract Background The risk of re-occlusion and inadequate reperfusion limits the efficacy of thrombolysis within 4.
5 hours for acute ischemic stroke.
Tirofiban, a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, has been studied as an adjunctive treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome.
This meta-analysis evaluates existing evidence on the effectiveness and safety of tirofiban following thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Methods PubMed, Science Direct, Clinicaltrials.
gov, and The Cochrane Library were searched for RCTs between 2011 and 2025.
All studies included acute ischemic stroke patients, aged ≥ 18 years, NIHSS >4, who received IV thrombolysis before tirofiban administration.
Endpoints included mRS score, SICH, risk of systemic bleeding, and mortality.
The quality of the studies was assessed using the ROB2 tool, and risk ratios were calculated and analyzed.
The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251106033).
Results Only five trials were included from the original articles retrieved from the searched databases.
Two trials had a low risk of bias, one had some concerns, and two had a high risk of bias.
Results showed a significant improvement in mRS score with IVT plus tirofiban (RR 1.
32; 95% CI 1.
07–1.
62; p = 0.
010), while also showing an increase in SICH with IVT plus tirofiban; however, the results were not significant (RR 1.
86; 95% CI 0.
18–19.
24; p = 0.
60).
No difference in mortality was observed between the two groups (RR 1.
06; 95% CI 0.
56–2.
04; p = 0.
85).
Conclusion IVT plus tirofiban significantly improves functional outcomes without increasing mortality despite the risk of SICH.

Related Results

Can Tirofiban Improve the Outcome of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
Can Tirofiban Improve the Outcome of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tirofiban for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS), especially posterior circulation stroke (PCS).Methods: We enrolled consec...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Abstract Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that promotes antitumor immunity. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety...
Frequency of in-Hospital complications in patients with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction with and without thrombolysis.
Frequency of in-Hospital complications in patients with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction with and without thrombolysis.
Objective: To compare the frequency of in-hospital complications in patients with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction with and without thrombolysis. Study Design: Descriptive...
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
Abstract WMP1: Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Mechanical Thrombectomy: the THRACE Randomized Trial
Abstract WMP1: Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Mechanical Thrombectomy: the THRACE Randomized Trial
Background and purpose: The benefit of mechanical thrombectomy added to intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke has been largely demonstrated. H...

Back to Top