Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Ferdinandovo zřízení zemské? Porovnání českých zemských zřízení z let 1500 a 1549
View through CrossRef
This paper focuses on the comparison of two crucial legal codes of the Bohemian land law of the first half of the 16th century, i.e., Land Constitution of Vladislav enacted in the year 1500 (in Czech Vladislavské zřízení zemské) and Land Constitution of 1549. The aim is to answer the question whether it is possible to perceive Land Constitution of 1549 in the same way as it is understood by the majority of the current historiography, meaning whether Land Constitution of 1549 is only redaction of Land Constitution of Vladislav. The paper shall concentrate on the issue if there is a reason to reconsider the general view on this matter. It may be established that these legal codes are relatively independent works due to their dissimilarities as they differ significantly in their origin, authors, historical context, central ideas, and structure. In general, the distribution of power is a key aspect of forming the law, which applies not only to the early modern period, and this idea is reflected in the structure and content of both these codifications. The paper focuses on the comparison of the various aspects of Land Constitution of Vladislav and Land Constitution of 1549. The core of the comparison is analysis of a number of key articles about, e.g., the relationship between the monarch and the estates, the distribution of power in the state, the functioning of the basic institutions of the early modern state, and of selected areas of private and public law.
Title: Ferdinandovo zřízení zemské? Porovnání českých zemských zřízení z let 1500 a 1549
Description:
This paper focuses on the comparison of two crucial legal codes of the Bohemian land law of the first half of the 16th century, i.
e.
, Land Constitution of Vladislav enacted in the year 1500 (in Czech Vladislavské zřízení zemské) and Land Constitution of 1549.
The aim is to answer the question whether it is possible to perceive Land Constitution of 1549 in the same way as it is understood by the majority of the current historiography, meaning whether Land Constitution of 1549 is only redaction of Land Constitution of Vladislav.
The paper shall concentrate on the issue if there is a reason to reconsider the general view on this matter.
It may be established that these legal codes are relatively independent works due to their dissimilarities as they differ significantly in their origin, authors, historical context, central ideas, and structure.
In general, the distribution of power is a key aspect of forming the law, which applies not only to the early modern period, and this idea is reflected in the structure and content of both these codifications.
The paper focuses on the comparison of the various aspects of Land Constitution of Vladislav and Land Constitution of 1549.
The core of the comparison is analysis of a number of key articles about, e.
g.
, the relationship between the monarch and the estates, the distribution of power in the state, the functioning of the basic institutions of the early modern state, and of selected areas of private and public law.
Related Results
Nazwiska czeskie a Czesi w Polsce w XX w.
Nazwiska czeskie a Czesi w Polsce w XX w.
Czech names and Czech in Poland in the 20th centuryThe article was based on more than 600 Czech surnames from Słownik nazwisk współcześnie w Polsce używanych used by Kazimierz Rymu...
Innovation policy at regional level
Innovation policy at regional level
Inovační politika na regionální úrovni
Možnost regionů vytvářet vlastní inovační politiku do značné míry závisí na jejich pravomocích a dostupných finančních a lidsk...
Tělesná výchova v kurikulu Anglie: komparace s RVP ZV
Tělesná výchova v kurikulu Anglie: komparace s RVP ZV
Příspěvek je zaměřen na analýzu projektovaného kurikula tělesné výchovy (TV) v Anglii a jeho porovnání s RVP ZV z hlediska koncepce TV, cílů, vzdělávacího obsahu a vybraných kvalit...
Analysis of Czech organizations participation in the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme
Analysis of Czech organizations participation in the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme
Analýza účasti českých organizací v Rámcovém programu pro konkurenceschopnost a inovace
Příspěvek se zabývá českou účastí v Rámcovém programu pro konkurenceschopnost...
Měšek nebo Dago, Dobrava nebo Doubravka – jména prvního polského vladce a jeho české manželky
Měšek nebo Dago, Dobrava nebo Doubravka – jména prvního polského vladce a jeho české manželky
Autor analyzuje jména Mieszko a Dąbrówka/Doubravka v polských a českých historických pramenech. Odkazuje také na současné lingvistické studie, které zpochybňují existenci jména Mie...
Dalibor Havel, Počátky latinské písemné kultury v českých zemích
Dalibor Havel, Počátky latinské písemné kultury v českých zemích
Review of Dalibor Havel, Počátky latinské písemné kultury v českých zemích. Nejstarší latinské rukopisy a zlomky v Čechách a na Moravě [The Beginnings of Latin Written Culture in t...
Christo si è fermato a Napoli. Renaissance und Reformation im Neapel des 16. Jahrhunderts (Giovanni Domenico di Lega, Morte di Christo, Napoli 1549)
Christo si è fermato a Napoli. Renaissance und Reformation im Neapel des 16. Jahrhunderts (Giovanni Domenico di Lega, Morte di Christo, Napoli 1549)
Abstract
Despite being only a minor member of the Neapolitan Accademia degli Incogniti and being far less known than prominent members of the academy such as Laura Terracin...
Ultrapassagem de barreira linguística e cooptação de mão de obra no Sul da Bahia: primeiros anos de Colonização Portuguesa (1500-1549)
Ultrapassagem de barreira linguística e cooptação de mão de obra no Sul da Bahia: primeiros anos de Colonização Portuguesa (1500-1549)
Neste artigo, temos como principais objetivos a explicitação de como se deu a ultrapassagem de barreira linguística e a cooptação inicial de mão de obra para os engenhos de produçã...

