Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Expert testimony
View through CrossRef
Welcome to the Expert Testimony series, where we interview the leading researchers in mobile computing and wireless networking to get their perspectives on their work, and their thoughts on the evolution of the field.
In this issue, we have an interview with Charles E. (Charlie) Perkins conducted by Shravan Rayanchu. Charles E. Perkins is a senior principal engineer at Futurewei, investigating mobile wireless networking and dynamic configuration protocols, in particular LTE and various IEEE and IETF efforts. He is serving as document editor for the 802.21 group of the IEEE, and is author or co-author of IETF standards-track documents in the dmm, mip4, mext, manet, dhc, and autoconf working groups. He is an editor for several journals in areas related to wireless networking. He has continued strong involvement with performance issues related to Internet access for billions of portable wireless devices as well as actitivies for ad hoc networking and scalability.
Charles has authored and edited books on Mobile IP and Ad Hoc Networking, and has published a number of papers and award winning articles in the areas of mobile networking, ad-hoc networking, route optimization for mobile networking, resource discovery, and automatic configuration for mobile computers. Charles was also one of the creators of MobiHoc, the premier conference series that has provided the forum for many of the most important publications in the field of ad hoc networking; he remains on the steering committee for that conference. He has served as general chair and Program Committee chair for MobiHoc, MASS 2006, ICWUS 2010, and other conferences and workshops. Charles has served on the Internet Architecture Board (IAB) of the IETF and, at last count, has authored or co-authored at least 25 RFCs. He has made numerous inventions and been awarded dozens of patents; he was recently nominated for Inventor of the Year by the European Patent Office. He has served on various committees for the National Research Council, as well as numerous technical assessment boards for Army Research Lab and the Swiss MICS program. He has also served as associate editor for Mobile Communications and Computing Review, the official publication of ACM SIGMOBILE, and has served on the editorial staff for IEEE Internet Computing magazine.
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Title: Expert testimony
Description:
Welcome to the Expert Testimony series, where we interview the leading researchers in mobile computing and wireless networking to get their perspectives on their work, and their thoughts on the evolution of the field.
In this issue, we have an interview with Charles E.
(Charlie) Perkins conducted by Shravan Rayanchu.
Charles E.
Perkins is a senior principal engineer at Futurewei, investigating mobile wireless networking and dynamic configuration protocols, in particular LTE and various IEEE and IETF efforts.
He is serving as document editor for the 802.
21 group of the IEEE, and is author or co-author of IETF standards-track documents in the dmm, mip4, mext, manet, dhc, and autoconf working groups.
He is an editor for several journals in areas related to wireless networking.
He has continued strong involvement with performance issues related to Internet access for billions of portable wireless devices as well as actitivies for ad hoc networking and scalability.
Charles has authored and edited books on Mobile IP and Ad Hoc Networking, and has published a number of papers and award winning articles in the areas of mobile networking, ad-hoc networking, route optimization for mobile networking, resource discovery, and automatic configuration for mobile computers.
Charles was also one of the creators of MobiHoc, the premier conference series that has provided the forum for many of the most important publications in the field of ad hoc networking; he remains on the steering committee for that conference.
He has served as general chair and Program Committee chair for MobiHoc, MASS 2006, ICWUS 2010, and other conferences and workshops.
Charles has served on the Internet Architecture Board (IAB) of the IETF and, at last count, has authored or co-authored at least 25 RFCs.
He has made numerous inventions and been awarded dozens of patents; he was recently nominated for Inventor of the Year by the European Patent Office.
He has served on various committees for the National Research Council, as well as numerous technical assessment boards for Army Research Lab and the Swiss MICS program.
He has also served as associate editor for Mobile Communications and Computing Review, the official publication of ACM SIGMOBILE, and has served on the editorial staff for IEEE Internet Computing magazine.
Related Results
Public Scientific Testimony I
Public Scientific Testimony I
Abstract
Chapter 5 concerns scientific expert testimony—i.e., testimony from scientific experts to laypersons. It surveys empirical research on social and psychologi...
Jury Comprehension of Expert Evidence
Jury Comprehension of Expert Evidence
AbstractThe effectiveness of expert testimony in litigation is limited by a factor independent of the strength of opinion testimony—the level of comprehension of the jurors. If the...
Scientific Testimony
Scientific Testimony
Abstract
Scientific Testimony concerns the roles of scientific testimony in science and society. The book develops a positive alternative to a tradition famously exp...
Testimony and the Scientific Enterprise
Testimony and the Scientific Enterprise
Abstract
Chapter 1 opens with some conceptual clarifications and a provisional taxonomy of types of scientific testimony. Notably, this includes the distinction betw...
Jury Instructions on Expert Testimony
Jury Instructions on Expert Testimony
Abstract
Jury instructions are a fundamental part of the justice system, providing jurors with guidance on the legal concepts necessary to resolving a case. Although expe...
The Significance of Scentific Testimony
The Significance of Scentific Testimony
Abstract
Chapter 7 begins with arguments for two theses concerning intra-scientific testimony. The first thesis, Methodology, is the claim that the distinctive norms...
Scientific Justification as the Basis of Scientific Testimony
Scientific Justification as the Basis of Scientific Testimony
Abstract
Chapter 3 provides a characterization of scientific testimony that differentiates it from other types of testimony. According to this characterization, scie...
Inspection Cross Expertise in Criminal Procedure
Inspection Cross Expertise in Criminal Procedure
<em>In criminal procedural law, we know that to prove that an event was a criminal event, a mechanism is needed which is not simple. In the Criminal Code, it is stated that i...

