Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Evaluation of malingering
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Malingering is defined as the deliberate production of symptoms of mental illness, with a clear external incentive. It may also be an environment-driven adaptive mechanism. In the carceral setting, malingering often proves challenging. Presentation may differ, detection strategies used elsewhere may not work in carceral settings, and inaccurate determinations may have serious consequences. Diagnosing malingering requires a thorough knowledge of genuine mental illness, a systematic approach to evaluation, identification of objective indicators, and the use of scientifically validated psychological tests when necessary. It is important that carceral clinicians investigate possibilities such as factitious disorder, dissimulation, and false imputation. Carceral clinicians must be aware of their own misassumptions and biases about incarcerated persons’ response styles, particularly in settings where incarcerated persons may have to convey their symptoms more forcefully to receive needed care. The finding that an incarcerated person has malingered symptoms does not rule out the presence of true mental illness, and a determination of malingering should not exclude the individual from receiving needed mental health services.
Oxford University PressNew York
Title: Evaluation of malingering
Description:
Abstract
Malingering is defined as the deliberate production of symptoms of mental illness, with a clear external incentive.
It may also be an environment-driven adaptive mechanism.
In the carceral setting, malingering often proves challenging.
Presentation may differ, detection strategies used elsewhere may not work in carceral settings, and inaccurate determinations may have serious consequences.
Diagnosing malingering requires a thorough knowledge of genuine mental illness, a systematic approach to evaluation, identification of objective indicators, and the use of scientifically validated psychological tests when necessary.
It is important that carceral clinicians investigate possibilities such as factitious disorder, dissimulation, and false imputation.
Carceral clinicians must be aware of their own misassumptions and biases about incarcerated persons’ response styles, particularly in settings where incarcerated persons may have to convey their symptoms more forcefully to receive needed care.
The finding that an incarcerated person has malingered symptoms does not rule out the presence of true mental illness, and a determination of malingering should not exclude the individual from receiving needed mental health services.
Related Results
Psychological assessment of malingering in psychogenic neurological disorders and non‐psychogenic neurological disorders: relationship to psychopathology levels
Psychological assessment of malingering in psychogenic neurological disorders and non‐psychogenic neurological disorders: relationship to psychopathology levels
Background and purpose: It remains unknown whether psychological distress causes malingering in patients with psychogenic symptoms.Methods: We studied 26 patients with psychogeni...
Malingering: Forensic Evaluations
Malingering: Forensic Evaluations
AbstractMalingering for the purposes of evading criminal prosecution or obtaining drugs is commonly seen in forensic settings, and forensic mental health clinicians often face diff...
Detecting Malingered Psychotic Symptoms With the Rorschach Projective Technique
Detecting Malingered Psychotic Symptoms With the Rorschach Projective Technique
Problem. Criminal defendants may be strongly motivated to avoid prosecution by appearing mentally ill, and the malingering of psychotic symptoms is of special concern in legal proc...
"Best Tradition": CREATE, JCSEE and the Program Evaluation Standards
"Best Tradition": CREATE, JCSEE and the Program Evaluation Standards
Background: Evaluation “is a task in the best tradition of the most abstract theoretical science as well as the most practical applied science” (Scriven, 1968, p .9). The Program E...
Program Evaluation Standards for Utility Facilitate Stakeholder Internalization of Evaluative Thinking in the West Virginia Clinical Translational Science Institute
Program Evaluation Standards for Utility Facilitate Stakeholder Internalization of Evaluative Thinking in the West Virginia Clinical Translational Science Institute
Background: The Program Evaluation Standards (PES) can be considered established criteria for high quality evaluations. We emphasize PES Utility Standards and evaluation capacity b...
Doering search for Xu SR 2023 malingering v1
Doering search for Xu SR 2023 malingering v1
This protocol details the Doering search for Xu SR 2023 malingering....
The Detection of Malingering
The Detection of Malingering
A 60-item paper-and-pencil inventory showed a 98% “hit-rate” in distinguishing between honest and simulated malingering protocols produced by 29 nonclinical subjects who took the i...
Evaluation Practices of Community College Faculty Development Programs
Evaluation Practices of Community College Faculty Development Programs
The purpose of this quantitative study was to determine the current state of community college faculty development program evaluation and identify possible influences on evaluation...

