Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A Rapid Evidence Review on Consumer Responses to Cell-Cultivated Products
View through CrossRef
An evidence review was undertaken to examine consumer responses to cell-cultivated products (meat, seafood, dairy and plants). Cell-cultivated products are foods made without slaughter or traditional farming. For example, cells from animals are grown in a controlled setting and then used to create the final product. Most of the available evidence only examined cell-cultivated meat. All findings are based on UK evidence, except where otherwise stated. The key findings are outlined below. A minority (16-41%) of people are willing to consume cell-cultivated meat in the UK • Willingness to consume cell-cultivated meat has not changed within the past two years (2022-2024), but appears to have increased over longer time periods. Perceived risks/concerns about cell-cultivated meat are more prevalent than perceived benefits • Over half of people (59%) think cell-cultivated meat could offer benefits, particularly for animal welfare, the environment and global food availability. • However, more people (85%) have concerns about cell-cultivated meat, particularly about its safety, unnaturalness and impacts on farmers. Peoples’ perceptions of the healthiness/nutritional value of cell-cultivated meat relative to conventional meat appear to be highly malleable • People may be influenced by the type of information they receive about the product (e.g., emphasising benefits/concerns) and the type of products compared. The terms ‘cell-cultivated’ or ‘cell-cultured’ best enable consumers to differentiate the product from conventional meat/seafood or plant-based products • However, terminology alone is insufficient to effectively communicate allergen information to consumers. People are generally unsure about whether regulation will prevent the sale of unsafe cell-cultivated meat, nevertheless, people expect these products to be regulated and clearly labelled • People perceive FSA approval of the product to be moderately to very important, and as slightly more important than other on-label claims such as ‘slaughter-free’, ‘carbon-neutral’, ‘produced without antibiotics’, and ‘non-GMO.’ Although all of these claims are still seen as moderately to very important. • People do not have a strong opinion on whether cell-cultivated meat/seafood should be sold in the same section of the supermarket as conventional meat/seafood.
Title: A Rapid Evidence Review on Consumer Responses to Cell-Cultivated Products
Description:
An evidence review was undertaken to examine consumer responses to cell-cultivated products (meat, seafood, dairy and plants).
Cell-cultivated products are foods made without slaughter or traditional farming.
For example, cells from animals are grown in a controlled setting and then used to create the final product.
Most of the available evidence only examined cell-cultivated meat.
All findings are based on UK evidence, except where otherwise stated.
The key findings are outlined below.
A minority (16-41%) of people are willing to consume cell-cultivated meat in the UK • Willingness to consume cell-cultivated meat has not changed within the past two years (2022-2024), but appears to have increased over longer time periods.
Perceived risks/concerns about cell-cultivated meat are more prevalent than perceived benefits • Over half of people (59%) think cell-cultivated meat could offer benefits, particularly for animal welfare, the environment and global food availability.
• However, more people (85%) have concerns about cell-cultivated meat, particularly about its safety, unnaturalness and impacts on farmers.
Peoples’ perceptions of the healthiness/nutritional value of cell-cultivated meat relative to conventional meat appear to be highly malleable • People may be influenced by the type of information they receive about the product (e.
g.
, emphasising benefits/concerns) and the type of products compared.
The terms ‘cell-cultivated’ or ‘cell-cultured’ best enable consumers to differentiate the product from conventional meat/seafood or plant-based products • However, terminology alone is insufficient to effectively communicate allergen information to consumers.
People are generally unsure about whether regulation will prevent the sale of unsafe cell-cultivated meat, nevertheless, people expect these products to be regulated and clearly labelled • People perceive FSA approval of the product to be moderately to very important, and as slightly more important than other on-label claims such as ‘slaughter-free’, ‘carbon-neutral’, ‘produced without antibiotics’, and ‘non-GMO.
’ Although all of these claims are still seen as moderately to very important.
• People do not have a strong opinion on whether cell-cultivated meat/seafood should be sold in the same section of the supermarket as conventional meat/seafood.
Related Results
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Objective: To determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population idiopathic determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Use of Personal Protective Equipment in General Practice and Ambulance settings: a rapid review
Use of Personal Protective Equipment in General Practice and Ambulance settings: a rapid review
Abstract
The use of personal protective equipment (PPE) is a cornerstone of infection prevention and control guidelines and was of increased importance during the C...
Materialism and Environmental Knowledge as a Mediator for Relationships between Religiosity and Ethical Consumption
Materialism and Environmental Knowledge as a Mediator for Relationships between Religiosity and Ethical Consumption
ABSTRACTOn a global and regional scale, Indonesia has one of the least environmentally sustainable economies in the Asia-Pacific region. Consumption is one of the key factors contr...
System Cognition and Analytic Technology of Cultivated Land Quality from a Data Perspective
System Cognition and Analytic Technology of Cultivated Land Quality from a Data Perspective
As cultivated land quality has been paid more and more scientific attention, its connotation generalization and cognitive bias are widespread, bringing many challenges to the inves...
Cell-based, cell-cultured, cell-cultivated, cultured, or cultivated. What is the best name for meat, poultry, and seafood made directly from the cells of animals?
Cell-based, cell-cultured, cell-cultivated, cultured, or cultivated. What is the best name for meat, poultry, and seafood made directly from the cells of animals?
Abstract
To be sold in the United States, meat, poultry, and seafood products made from cultured cells must be labeled with a “common or usual name” to help consu...

