Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Chemicals without Harm
View through CrossRef
A proposal for a new chemicals strategy: that we work to develop safer alternatives to hazardous chemicals rather than focusing exclusively on controlling them.
Today, there are thousands of synthetic chemicals used to make our clothing, cosmetics, household products, electronic devices, even our children's toys. Many of these chemicals help us live longer and more comfortable lives, but some of these highly useful chemicals are also persistent, toxic, and dangerous to our health and the environment. For fifty years, the conventional approach to hazardous chemicals has focused on regulation, barriers, and protection. In Chemicals without Harm, Ken Geiser proposes a different strategy, based on developing and adopting safer alternatives to hazardous chemicals rather than focusing exclusively on controlling them.
Geiser reviews past government policies focused on controlling chemicals, describes government initiatives outside the United States that have begun to implement a more sustainable chemical policy, and offers an overview of the chemicals industry and market. He develops a safer chemicals policy framework that includes processes for characterizing, classifying, and prioritizing chemicals; generating and using new chemical information; and promoting transitions to safer chemicals.
The shift in strategy described by Geiser will require broad changes in science, the chemicals economy, and government policy. Geiser shows that it is already beginning, identifying an emerging movement of scientists, corporate managers, environmental activists, and government leaders who are fashioning a new, twenty-first-century approach to chemicals.
Title: Chemicals without Harm
Description:
A proposal for a new chemicals strategy: that we work to develop safer alternatives to hazardous chemicals rather than focusing exclusively on controlling them.
Today, there are thousands of synthetic chemicals used to make our clothing, cosmetics, household products, electronic devices, even our children's toys.
Many of these chemicals help us live longer and more comfortable lives, but some of these highly useful chemicals are also persistent, toxic, and dangerous to our health and the environment.
For fifty years, the conventional approach to hazardous chemicals has focused on regulation, barriers, and protection.
In Chemicals without Harm, Ken Geiser proposes a different strategy, based on developing and adopting safer alternatives to hazardous chemicals rather than focusing exclusively on controlling them.
Geiser reviews past government policies focused on controlling chemicals, describes government initiatives outside the United States that have begun to implement a more sustainable chemical policy, and offers an overview of the chemicals industry and market.
He develops a safer chemicals policy framework that includes processes for characterizing, classifying, and prioritizing chemicals; generating and using new chemical information; and promoting transitions to safer chemicals.
The shift in strategy described by Geiser will require broad changes in science, the chemicals economy, and government policy.
Geiser shows that it is already beginning, identifying an emerging movement of scientists, corporate managers, environmental activists, and government leaders who are fashioning a new, twenty-first-century approach to chemicals.
Related Results
Patient harm from cardiovascular medications
Patient harm from cardiovascular medications
Background
Medication harm can lead to hospital admission, prolonged hospital stay and poor patient outcomes. Reducing medication harm is a priority for healthc...
A Scoping Review: Self-harm pada Remaja
A Scoping Review: Self-harm pada Remaja
Abstract. Adolescents are seen as an age group that is vulnerable to self-harm. In recent years, cases of self-harm have increased. Exposure to physical, emotional, social changes ...
Preventable medication harm across health care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Preventable medication harm across health care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background
Mitigating or reducing the risk of medication harm is a global policy priority. But evidence reflecting preventab...
Doing and Allowing
Doing and Allowing
AbstractIs there a morally significant distinction between doing and allowing? The most natural way to understand this question is as asking whether doing harm is worse, in itself,...
Harm reduction social work with people who use drugs: a qualitative interview study with social workers in harm reduction services in Sweden
Harm reduction social work with people who use drugs: a qualitative interview study with social workers in harm reduction services in Sweden
Abstract
Background
Social work with people who use drugs (PWUD) has traditionally focused on abstinence and rehabilitation. In recent years, harm r...
Linking of chemical and effect-based monitoring to support comprehensive assessment of pollution in wastewater and surface water
Linking of chemical and effect-based monitoring to support comprehensive assessment of pollution in wastewater and surface water
Since the beginning of industrialisation, the global production of chemicals has increased many times over. According to a comprehensive analysis of national and regional chemical ...
Early maladaptive schemas are associated with self-injury thoughts and behavior in adolescents
Early maladaptive schemas are associated with self-injury thoughts and behavior in adolescents
Abstract
Background
Early maladaptive schemas (EMSs) and self-harm have been firmly linked in adults, but research on these associations in adolesce...
Harm Reduction Workforce, Behavioral Health, and Service Delivery: A Cross Sectional Study
Harm Reduction Workforce, Behavioral Health, and Service Delivery: A Cross Sectional Study
Abstract
Background
Despite recent financial and policy support for harm reduction, little is known about the harm reduction workforce—the specific types of workers within...

