Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Introducing a new and simplified geostatistical-based roughness algorithm
View through CrossRef
<p>The first aim of this work is to introduce a new geostatistical-based algorithm that permits to detect specific aspects of short-range surface roughness (or of image texture) which does not require user defined choices, except for the radius of the search window, and provides a high interpretability of the results.&#160; In particular, differently from usual geostatistical approaches, this algorithm does not require the derivation of a residual digital elevation model. The new proposed algorithm, despite its simplicity, permits to detect relevant aspects of surface texture, including anisotropy. Moreover, adopting approaches based of digital elevation model smoothing it can also be applied in the context of multiscale analysis. A second aim, functional to the introduction of the new algorithm, is to furnish a general overview of the key aspects of the geostatistical methodologies, highlighting analogies and differences with other approaches. In presenting the algorithm, a comparison with the roughness computed by means of dispersion of vectors normal to surface is performed.</p><p>&#160;</p><p>ATKINSON, P.M. and LEWIS, P., 2000. Geostatistical classification for remote sensing: An introduction. Computers and Geosciences, 26(4), pp. 361-371.</p><p>BALAGUER, A., RUIZ, L.A., HERMOSILLA, T. and RECIO, J.A., 2010. Definition of a comprehensive set of texture semivariogram features and their evaluation for object-oriented image classification. Computers and Geosciences, 36(2), pp. 231-240.</p><p>GUTH, P.L., 2001. Quantifying terrain fabric in digital elevation models. GSA Reviews in Engineering Geology, 14, pp. 13-25.</p><p>HERZFELD, U.C. and HIGGINSON, C.A., 1996. Automated geostatistical seafloor classification - Principles, parameters, feature vectors, and discrimination criteria. Computers and Geosciences, 22(1), pp. 35-41.</p><p>TREVISANI, S., CAVALLI, M. and MARCHI, L., 2009. Variogram maps from LiDAR data as fingerprints of surface morphology on scree slopes. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 9(1), pp. 129-133.</p><p>TREVISANI, S., CAVALLI, M. and MARCHI, L., 2012. Surface texture analysis of a high-resolution DTM: Interpreting an alpine basin. Geomorphology, 161-162, pp. 26-39.</p><p>TREVISANI, S. and ROCCA, M., 2015. MAD: Robust image texture analysis for applications in high resolution geomorphometry. Computers and Geosciences, 81, pp. 78-92.</p><p>TREVISANI, S. and CAVALLI, M., 2016. Topography-based flow-directional roughness: Potential and challenges. Earth Surface Dynamics, 4(2), pp. 343-358.</p><p>&#160;</p>
Title: Introducing a new and simplified geostatistical-based roughness algorithm
Description:
<p>The first aim of this work is to introduce a new geostatistical-based algorithm that permits to detect specific aspects of short-range surface roughness (or of image texture) which does not require user defined choices, except for the radius of the search window, and provides a high interpretability of the results.
&#160; In particular, differently from usual geostatistical approaches, this algorithm does not require the derivation of a residual digital elevation model.
The new proposed algorithm, despite its simplicity, permits to detect relevant aspects of surface texture, including anisotropy.
Moreover, adopting approaches based of digital elevation model smoothing it can also be applied in the context of multiscale analysis.
A second aim, functional to the introduction of the new algorithm, is to furnish a general overview of the key aspects of the geostatistical methodologies, highlighting analogies and differences with other approaches.
In presenting the algorithm, a comparison with the roughness computed by means of dispersion of vectors normal to surface is performed.
</p><p>&#160;</p><p>ATKINSON, P.
M.
and LEWIS, P.
, 2000.
Geostatistical classification for remote sensing: An introduction.
Computers and Geosciences, 26(4), pp.
361-371.
</p><p>BALAGUER, A.
, RUIZ, L.
A.
, HERMOSILLA, T.
and RECIO, J.
A.
, 2010.
Definition of a comprehensive set of texture semivariogram features and their evaluation for object-oriented image classification.
Computers and Geosciences, 36(2), pp.
231-240.
</p><p>GUTH, P.
L.
, 2001.
Quantifying terrain fabric in digital elevation models.
GSA Reviews in Engineering Geology, 14, pp.
13-25.
</p><p>HERZFELD, U.
C.
and HIGGINSON, C.
A.
, 1996.
Automated geostatistical seafloor classification - Principles, parameters, feature vectors, and discrimination criteria.
Computers and Geosciences, 22(1), pp.
35-41.
</p><p>TREVISANI, S.
, CAVALLI, M.
and MARCHI, L.
, 2009.
Variogram maps from LiDAR data as fingerprints of surface morphology on scree slopes.
Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 9(1), pp.
129-133.
</p><p>TREVISANI, S.
, CAVALLI, M.
and MARCHI, L.
, 2012.
Surface texture analysis of a high-resolution DTM: Interpreting an alpine basin.
Geomorphology, 161-162, pp.
26-39.
</p><p>TREVISANI, S.
and ROCCA, M.
, 2015.
MAD: Robust image texture analysis for applications in high resolution geomorphometry.
Computers and Geosciences, 81, pp.
78-92.
</p><p>TREVISANI, S.
and CAVALLI, M.
, 2016.
Topography-based flow-directional roughness: Potential and challenges.
Earth Surface Dynamics, 4(2), pp.
343-358.
</p><p>&#160;</p>.
Related Results
Estimation of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) soil moisture with the use of fractal roughness
Estimation of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) soil moisture with the use of fractal roughness
<p>To estimate surface soil moisture from Sentinel-1 backscattering, accurate estimation of soil roughness is a key. However, it is usually error source, due to compl...
Experimental and numerical investigation into the effect of surface roughness on particle rebound
Experimental and numerical investigation into the effect of surface roughness on particle rebound
Erosion damage and particle deposition are crucial wear phenomena in gas turbine engines. As a result, compressor efficiency decreases, stability margin reduces, and maintenance co...
Using Geostatistics To Evaluate Cleanup Goals
Using Geostatistics To Evaluate Cleanup Goals
Michael F. Marcon and Loren P. Hopkins
Abstract
Geostatistical analysis is a powerful predictive tool typically used to define s...
An In Vitro Evaluation of Alumina, Zirconia, and Lithium Disilicate Surface Roughness Caused by Two Scaling Instruments
An In Vitro Evaluation of Alumina, Zirconia, and Lithium Disilicate Surface Roughness Caused by Two Scaling Instruments
AbstractPurposePlaque control is crucial for the prevention of inflammatory periodontal disease. Hand scaling instruments have been shown to be efficient for the removal of plaque;...
Influence of Natural Bovine Enamel Roughness on Bond Strength after Etching
Influence of Natural Bovine Enamel Roughness on Bond Strength after Etching
Abstract
Objective:
To determine and compare the longitudinal and transverse roughness parameters of the enamel surface of bovine teeth and evaluate th...
Effect of Micro-Scale Asperities on Shear Behavior of Artificial Rock Joints
Effect of Micro-Scale Asperities on Shear Behavior of Artificial Rock Joints
ABSTRACT
Various devices such as Barton comb, optical and laser scanner are used to record surface geometries of rock joints for roughness measurement. Measuremen...
Pengaruh Obat Kumur Beralkohol terhadap Kekasaran Permukaan Semen Ionomer Kaca Konvensional
Pengaruh Obat Kumur Beralkohol terhadap Kekasaran Permukaan Semen Ionomer Kaca Konvensional
Surface roughness is one of the important properties to determine the aesthetic and long-term durability of a dental restoration materials such as glass ionomer cements. In the ora...
Enamel surface roughness assessment after debonding, employing three different removal methods.
Enamel surface roughness assessment after debonding, employing three different removal methods.
The search for an efficient and safe resin removal method after debonding has resulted in the introduction of a wide array of instruments and techniques. In the previously, safety ...

