Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Update on the Clinical Trials Landscape: Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Data: 2000-2020
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background: The clinical trials landscape has evolved over the last two decades, shaped by advances in therapeutics and drug development, the emerging role of technology in trials, innovation in trial design and methods, and increased access to clinical trial information and data through registration. The ClinicalTrials.gov website was launched in 2000 by the NIH National Library of Medicine and is the largest clinical trials registry worldwide. The purpose of this cross-sectional analysis is to describe the composition and methodologic features of clinical trials as registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, and to identify key trends over time. Methods: We analyzed data from the publicly available CTTI AACT database, focusing on trials (interventional studies) started between 1 January, 2000 through 31 December, 2020. Characteristics of trial design (e.g., randomization, use of masking, sample size), eligibility criteria, outcome types, interventions, conditions, and results reporting were summarized over time. Results: There were 271,272 trials included in the analysis, of which 57% were completed. Most trials were randomized (66%), single site (68.7%), funded by other sources (69.0%) and had sample sizes less than 100 participants (62%). There was a significant increase in trials without FDA-defined phases ("Phase N/A") observed over time as a result of evolving trial designs, interventions and outcome types. Over 3,000 trials related to COVID-19 started in 2020 alone. Conclusions: ClinicalTrials.gov is a powerful tool that provides a window into the past, present, and future of the clinical research enterprise. Understanding characteristics and trends of trials can inform future trial design and clinical decision making.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Update on the Clinical Trials Landscape: Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Data: 2000-2020
Description:
Abstract
Background: The clinical trials landscape has evolved over the last two decades, shaped by advances in therapeutics and drug development, the emerging role of technology in trials, innovation in trial design and methods, and increased access to clinical trial information and data through registration.
The ClinicalTrials.
gov website was launched in 2000 by the NIH National Library of Medicine and is the largest clinical trials registry worldwide.
The purpose of this cross-sectional analysis is to describe the composition and methodologic features of clinical trials as registered on ClinicalTrials.
gov, and to identify key trends over time.
Methods: We analyzed data from the publicly available CTTI AACT database, focusing on trials (interventional studies) started between 1 January, 2000 through 31 December, 2020.
Characteristics of trial design (e.
g.
, randomization, use of masking, sample size), eligibility criteria, outcome types, interventions, conditions, and results reporting were summarized over time.
Results: There were 271,272 trials included in the analysis, of which 57% were completed.
Most trials were randomized (66%), single site (68.
7%), funded by other sources (69.
0%) and had sample sizes less than 100 participants (62%).
There was a significant increase in trials without FDA-defined phases ("Phase N/A") observed over time as a result of evolving trial designs, interventions and outcome types.
Over 3,000 trials related to COVID-19 started in 2020 alone.
Conclusions: ClinicalTrials.
gov is a powerful tool that provides a window into the past, present, and future of the clinical research enterprise.
Understanding characteristics and trends of trials can inform future trial design and clinical decision making.
Related Results
Impact of water demand for irrigation on the water availability of the Urubu River in Brazil 
Impact of water demand for irrigation on the water availability of the Urubu River in Brazil 
<p>There are 37 hydraulic water catchment pumps installed in the Urubu River hydrographic basin, located in an important agricultural area in the northern region of B...
Update on the clinical trial landscape: analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov registration data, 2000–2020
Update on the clinical trial landscape: analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov registration data, 2000–2020
Abstract
Background
The clinical trial landscape has evolved over the last two decades, shaped by advances in therapeutics and drug development and...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Clinical trial transparency in gastrointestinal endoscopy research
Clinical trial transparency in gastrointestinal endoscopy research
Abstract
Background Under-reporting of clinical trial results can lead to negative consequences that include inhibiting propagation of knowledge, limiting the understandi...
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com
Abstract
Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...
Registration, publication, and outcome reporting among pivotal clinical trials that supported FDA approval of high-risk cardiovascular devices before and after FDAAA
Registration, publication, and outcome reporting among pivotal clinical trials that supported FDA approval of high-risk cardiovascular devices before and after FDAAA
Abstract
Background
Selective registration, publication, and outcome reporting of clinical trials distort the primary clinical evidence that is avai...
Registration, Publication, and Outcome Reporting among Pivotal Clinical Trials that Supported FDA Approval of High-Risk Medical Devices Before and After FDAAA
Registration, Publication, and Outcome Reporting among Pivotal Clinical Trials that Supported FDA Approval of High-Risk Medical Devices Before and After FDAAA
ABSTRACTBackgroundSelective registration, publication, and outcome reporting of clinical trials distorts the primary clinical evidence that is available to patients and clinicians ...

