Acute changes in right ventricular geometry and function following transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions

Abstract Background Little is known about acute changes in right ventricular (RV) function and geometry following transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) or transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR). Pressure-strain-volume loop-derived myocardial work metrics showed associations with myocardial energetics and contractility in conditions accompanied by volume overload, suggesting their potential utility in patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Purpose To define acute changes in RV volumes and RV myocardial work following T-TEER and TTVR using conventional and pressure-strain-volume derived RV work metrics. Methods In this multicenter, observational study, 3D echocardiographic datasets and invasively acquired RV pressures were collected before and after transcatheter tricuspid valve procedure. Using dedicated software (ReVISION, Argus Cognitive) 3D RV volumes and strains were quantified and decomposed to longitudinal, radial and anterio-posterior motion. Forward stroke volume (SV) was calculated by subtracting TR volumes from RV 3D end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV) difference. Three-dimensional pressure-strain-volume loops were constructed and global RV work-index (RV-Wi) was calculated. Changes in RV parameters before and after the intervention were compared using paired-samples t test. Results Of 37 patients included in this study (65% male), 20 underwent T-TEER and 17 underwent TTVR. Compared to T-TEER patients, patients undergoing TTVR had higher prevalence of torrential TR at baseline but also achieved a higher reduction in TR volumes after the intervention (44 ± 11 ml vs 60 ± 16ml; p = 0,001). Following T-TEER there was a significant reduction in RV EDV (240 ± 93 ml vs 200 ± 80 ml; p < 0.001) and increase in SV (55 ± 34 ml vs 68 ± 26 ml; p = 0.036). Following TTVR there was a significant increase in RV ESV (121 ± 46 vs 146 ± 48, p = 0.003) and no significant change in SV (47 ± 24 ml vs 55 ± 20 ml; p = 0.143). There was significant reduction in RV strain and ejection fraction (EF) (all p < 0.001) primarily driven by reduction of radial motion component in both groups. RV-Wi increased in 35% (7/20) of T-TEER patients and in 18% of (3/17) TTVR patients. Conclusion An acute reduction in RV EF was observed in all patients and was mainly caused by decrease in RV EDV in T-TEER patients and increase in RV ESV in TTVR patients. Despite decrease of conventional metrics of RV function in both groups, an increase in RV-Wi was observed in 27% of all patients.Baseline and follow-up characteristicsCentral Figure