Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Different regulation of CO 2 emission from streams and lakes

View through CrossRef
Abstract. It has become more and more evident that CO2 emission (FCO2) from freshwater systems is an important part in the global carbon cycle. Only few studies addressed the different mechanisms regulating FCO2 from lotic and lentic systems. In a comparative study we investigated how different biogeochemical and physical factors can affect FCO2 from streams and reservoirs. We examined the seasonal variability in CO2 concentrations and emissions from four streams and two pre-dams of a large drinking water reservoir located in the same catchment, and compared them with parallel measured environmental factors. All streams generally were supersaturated with CO2 over the whole year, while both reservoirs where CO2 sinks during summer stratification and sources after circulation. FCO2 from streams ranged from 23 to 355 mmol m–2 d–1 and exceeded the fluxes from the reservoirs (–24 to 97 mmol m–2 d–1). Both the generally high piston velocity (k) and CO2 oversaturation were responsible for the higher FCO2 from streams in comparison to lakes. In both, streams and reservoirs FCO2 was mainly controlled by the CO2 concentration (r = 0.86 for dams, r = 0.90 for streams), which was clearly affected by metabolism and nutrients in both systems. Besides CO2 concentration, also physical factors control FCO2 in lakes and streams. During stratification FCO2 in both pre-dams was controlled by primary production in the epilimnion, which led to a decrease of FCO2. During circulation when CO2 from the hypolimnion was mixed with the epilimnion and the organic matter mineralisation was more relevant, FCO2 increased. FCO2 from streams was physically controlled especially by geomorphological and hydrological factors regulating k, which is less relevant in low wind lakes. We developed a schematic model describing the role of the different regulation mechanism on FCO2 from streams and lakes. Taken together, FCO2 is generally mostly controlled by CO2 concentration in the surface water. Lake stratification is a very important factor regulating FCO2 from lakes via controlling CO2 concentration and metabolism. But FCO2 in heterotrophic streams is generally higher. The higher k values are responsible for the comparable high FCO2. On a Central European landscape scale CO2 emission from streams was more relevant than the CO2 flux from standing waters.
Title: Different regulation of CO 2 emission from streams and lakes
Description:
Abstract.
It has become more and more evident that CO2 emission (FCO2) from freshwater systems is an important part in the global carbon cycle.
Only few studies addressed the different mechanisms regulating FCO2 from lotic and lentic systems.
In a comparative study we investigated how different biogeochemical and physical factors can affect FCO2 from streams and reservoirs.
We examined the seasonal variability in CO2 concentrations and emissions from four streams and two pre-dams of a large drinking water reservoir located in the same catchment, and compared them with parallel measured environmental factors.
All streams generally were supersaturated with CO2 over the whole year, while both reservoirs where CO2 sinks during summer stratification and sources after circulation.
FCO2 from streams ranged from 23 to 355 mmol m–2 d–1 and exceeded the fluxes from the reservoirs (–24 to 97 mmol m–2 d–1).
Both the generally high piston velocity (k) and CO2 oversaturation were responsible for the higher FCO2 from streams in comparison to lakes.
In both, streams and reservoirs FCO2 was mainly controlled by the CO2 concentration (r = 0.
86 for dams, r = 0.
90 for streams), which was clearly affected by metabolism and nutrients in both systems.
Besides CO2 concentration, also physical factors control FCO2 in lakes and streams.
During stratification FCO2 in both pre-dams was controlled by primary production in the epilimnion, which led to a decrease of FCO2.
During circulation when CO2 from the hypolimnion was mixed with the epilimnion and the organic matter mineralisation was more relevant, FCO2 increased.
FCO2 from streams was physically controlled especially by geomorphological and hydrological factors regulating k, which is less relevant in low wind lakes.
We developed a schematic model describing the role of the different regulation mechanism on FCO2 from streams and lakes.
Taken together, FCO2 is generally mostly controlled by CO2 concentration in the surface water.
Lake stratification is a very important factor regulating FCO2 from lakes via controlling CO2 concentration and metabolism.
But FCO2 in heterotrophic streams is generally higher.
The higher k values are responsible for the comparable high FCO2.
On a Central European landscape scale CO2 emission from streams was more relevant than the CO2 flux from standing waters.

Related Results

Regulation of CO 2 emissions from temperate streams and reservoirs
Regulation of CO 2 emissions from temperate streams and reservoirs
Abstract. It has become more and more evident that CO2 emission (FCO2) from freshwater systems is an important part of the global carbon cycle. To date, only a few studies have add...
Anticipating future ice-dammed lakes across High Mountain Asia
Anticipating future ice-dammed lakes across High Mountain Asia
<p>Over recent decades, a significant increase in the amount and the size of glacier lakes has been observed. These lakes enhance glacier mass loss but also present s...
Saline systems of the Great Plains of western Canada: an overview of the limnogeology and paleolimnology
Saline systems of the Great Plains of western Canada: an overview of the limnogeology and paleolimnology
AbstractIn much of the northern Great Plains, saline and hypersaline lacustrine brines are the only surface waters present. As a group, the lakes of this region are unique: there i...
Zooplankton Seasonal Abundance of South AmericanSaline Shallow Lakes
Zooplankton Seasonal Abundance of South AmericanSaline Shallow Lakes
AbstractThe central provinces of Argentina are characterized by the presence of a high number of shallow lakes, located in endorheic basins, many of which have elevated salinities ...
Blueprint for the Great Lakes Trail
Blueprint for the Great Lakes Trail
The Great Lakes are vast yet vulnerable. There is a need to focus the public’s attention on the significance of the lakes for the region as a cohesive, bi-national whole. To addres...
Basis for the protection and management of tropical lakes
Basis for the protection and management of tropical lakes
AbstractManagement of lakes for the protection of water quality, aquatic life and other uses must be approached somewhat differently in the tropics from how it is approached at tem...
Stable giants? Persistence and hazard potential of world's largest glacier lakes
Stable giants? Persistence and hazard potential of world's largest glacier lakes
Between 1990 and 2020, retreating glaciers have created accommodation space for ~20,000 new glacier lakes globally (+38%), increasing the total glacier lake area by ~2,000 km&#...
CH4, CO2 and BVOC emissions from three subarctic lakes in Northern Sweden with different chemical properties
CH4, CO2 and BVOC emissions from three subarctic lakes in Northern Sweden with different chemical properties
Climate warming is stronger in the northern high latitudes than the global average, making ecosystems in the region prone to change with future warming. Approximately 50% of all la...

Back to Top