Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Refuting Mental Health Misconceptions: A Quasi-Experiment with Abnormal Psychology Courses
View through CrossRef
Misconceptions about psychological phenomena are prevalent among students completing college-level psychology courses. Although these myths are often difficult to eliminate, efforts incorporating a refutational focus have demonstrated some initial promise in dispelling these beliefs. In the current quasi-experimental study, four sections of an online undergraduate Abnormal Psychology course ( n = 113 total students) were randomly assigned to receive either a myth-debunking poster assignment or class as usual. Students in the myth-debunking sections were assigned one of five mental health-focused myths and corresponding refutational readings to guide their development of posters aimed at informing their classmates about the misconception, disputing the misconception, and citing relevant evidence as support. Beliefs about common misconceptions (five directly addressed in the assignment and five filler myths) were measured at the beginning and end of the semester. Results indicated that students in the myth-debunking condition were significantly ( p < .001, d = 1.09) more likely to know the truth, at the conclusion of the course, compared to the control group. Overall, the myth-debunking intervention appears to have been effective at reducing students’ misconceptions about popular psychological myths, perhaps even some non-targeted psychological misconceptions.
Title: Refuting Mental Health Misconceptions: A Quasi-Experiment with Abnormal Psychology Courses
Description:
Misconceptions about psychological phenomena are prevalent among students completing college-level psychology courses.
Although these myths are often difficult to eliminate, efforts incorporating a refutational focus have demonstrated some initial promise in dispelling these beliefs.
In the current quasi-experimental study, four sections of an online undergraduate Abnormal Psychology course ( n = 113 total students) were randomly assigned to receive either a myth-debunking poster assignment or class as usual.
Students in the myth-debunking sections were assigned one of five mental health-focused myths and corresponding refutational readings to guide their development of posters aimed at informing their classmates about the misconception, disputing the misconception, and citing relevant evidence as support.
Beliefs about common misconceptions (five directly addressed in the assignment and five filler myths) were measured at the beginning and end of the semester.
Results indicated that students in the myth-debunking condition were significantly ( p < .
001, d = 1.
09) more likely to know the truth, at the conclusion of the course, compared to the control group.
Overall, the myth-debunking intervention appears to have been effective at reducing students’ misconceptions about popular psychological myths, perhaps even some non-targeted psychological misconceptions.
Related Results
Multimodal Emotion Recognition and Human Computer Interaction for AI-Driven Mental Health Support (Preprint)
Multimodal Emotion Recognition and Human Computer Interaction for AI-Driven Mental Health Support (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
Mental health has become one of the most urgent global health issues of the twenty-first century. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports tha...
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...
Multinationality mapping of public misconceptions about periodontal diseases and their public health implications
Multinationality mapping of public misconceptions about periodontal diseases and their public health implications
Background
While much research is focused on assessing the knowledge and attitudes of periodontal patients and the general population, no study addressed the pr...
Evaluation of the Published Obstetrics and Gynecology Ultrasound Curriculum Based Upon Expert Consensus Recommendations
Evaluation of the Published Obstetrics and Gynecology Ultrasound Curriculum Based Upon Expert Consensus Recommendations
Purpose: In 2018, experts published recommendations for training and assessing obstetric and gynecologic ultrasound skills in residency programs¹. This report evaluates the effecti...
Mental health inequalities and mental health nursing
Mental health inequalities and mental health nursing
Accessible summary
Current research clearly shows that mental health problems occur more frequently in some social groups than others. These inequalities in mental health affect p...
ANALISIS KESEHATAN MENTAL MAHASISWA SEKOLAH TINGGI ILMU KESEHATAN PANTI KOSALA
ANALISIS KESEHATAN MENTAL MAHASISWA SEKOLAH TINGGI ILMU KESEHATAN PANTI KOSALA
Masalah kesehatan mental remaja mulai disadari sebagai sesuatu yang sangat penting. Survey I-NAMHS (Indonesia- National Adolescent Mental Health Survey) pada tahun 2021 di Indonesi...
Digital Mental Health Landscaping in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Digital Mental Health Landscaping in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Introduction
The aim of this project was to map the landscape of who is doing what and where in digital mental health, and to pr...
Abnormal Psychology
Abnormal Psychology
This book presents the latest ideas and concepts in abnormal psychology. The book is divided into two parts: Part I deals with foundational ground work of mental disorders, whereas...

