Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Experience with the Quantification of Subsurface Uncertainties

View through CrossRef
Abstract Now that tools are available for building 3D earth models, and for quantifying uncertainties on parameters associated with the earth model, it is much easier to understand the impact of all subsurface uncertainties on field production. In the last years, we have accumulated a significant experience and know-how addressing this sort of issues in integrated studies. We briefly recall how we address the problems, what tools and methodologies are used for quantifying the joint impact of subsurface uncertainties. We discuss the key points in a study : clearly stressing which operational decision will be supported by the uncertainty study.reformulating the problem in terms of an uncertainty study workflow.listing the key subsurface uncertainties impacting the study.translating these key uncertainties into uncertainties on gross-rock volume, oil-in-place or reserves, using the workflow. Then we illustrate the approach with four field cases. The first example highlights how the joint impact of geometrical, geological and dynamic uncertainties on reserves estimates can be quantified. The second example focusses on the impact of fault sealing on a development decision for an HP-HT field. The third example shows how uncertainty figures can be used to help optimally locate an appraisal well. The last example illustrates how the quantification of structural uncertainties can be used to justify the acquisition or processing of seismic data. We also discuss how new uncertainty quantifications techniques are impacting some of the standard industry workflows. For instance : –scenario approaches can now be run in conjunction with probabilistic approaches.–rather than defining three mini, median and maxi geological models, we prefer to define these models in relation with quantitative parameters of interest, such as OIP and Reserves. We also stress that all our approach merely consists of translating uncertainties on input parameters into uncertainties on parameters of economic interest. The quality of the result obtained depends on the validity of quantified uncertainties on input parameters.
Title: Experience with the Quantification of Subsurface Uncertainties
Description:
Abstract Now that tools are available for building 3D earth models, and for quantifying uncertainties on parameters associated with the earth model, it is much easier to understand the impact of all subsurface uncertainties on field production.
In the last years, we have accumulated a significant experience and know-how addressing this sort of issues in integrated studies.
We briefly recall how we address the problems, what tools and methodologies are used for quantifying the joint impact of subsurface uncertainties.
We discuss the key points in a study : clearly stressing which operational decision will be supported by the uncertainty study.
reformulating the problem in terms of an uncertainty study workflow.
listing the key subsurface uncertainties impacting the study.
translating these key uncertainties into uncertainties on gross-rock volume, oil-in-place or reserves, using the workflow.
Then we illustrate the approach with four field cases.
The first example highlights how the joint impact of geometrical, geological and dynamic uncertainties on reserves estimates can be quantified.
The second example focusses on the impact of fault sealing on a development decision for an HP-HT field.
The third example shows how uncertainty figures can be used to help optimally locate an appraisal well.
The last example illustrates how the quantification of structural uncertainties can be used to justify the acquisition or processing of seismic data.
We also discuss how new uncertainty quantifications techniques are impacting some of the standard industry workflows.
For instance : –scenario approaches can now be run in conjunction with probabilistic approaches.
–rather than defining three mini, median and maxi geological models, we prefer to define these models in relation with quantitative parameters of interest, such as OIP and Reserves.
We also stress that all our approach merely consists of translating uncertainties on input parameters into uncertainties on parameters of economic interest.
The quality of the result obtained depends on the validity of quantified uncertainties on input parameters.

Related Results

Characterization and Comparison of Outcrop and Subsurface Unconventional Shale Samples
Characterization and Comparison of Outcrop and Subsurface Unconventional Shale Samples
Abstract Subsurface unconventional shale samples are always scarce. Outcrop analogs are often used as an alternative to enhance the understanding of the correspondin...
ARIA (Askaryan Regolith Imaging Array): An Instrument Concept for Novel Radio Frequency Characterization of Planetary Subsurfaces
ARIA (Askaryan Regolith Imaging Array): An Instrument Concept for Novel Radio Frequency Characterization of Planetary Subsurfaces
Planetary bodies can be affected by a number of geologic processes, including impacts, volcanism, volatile deposition, mass wasting, and weathering. Local stratigraphic sequences r...
Thermal energy storage with tunnels in different subsurface conditions
Thermal energy storage with tunnels in different subsurface conditions
The widespread use of the underground and global climate change impact the urban subsurface temperature. Changes in the subsurface environment can affect the performance of undergr...
Interaction of Mechanical Characteristics in Workpiece Subsurface Layers with Drilling Process Energy Characteristics
Interaction of Mechanical Characteristics in Workpiece Subsurface Layers with Drilling Process Energy Characteristics
The performance properties of various types of parts are predominantly determined by the subsurface layer forming methods of these parts. In this regard, cutting processes, which a...
Enceladus' Subsurface Secrets: Scientific Rationale for Future Radar Sounder Measurements
Enceladus' Subsurface Secrets: Scientific Rationale for Future Radar Sounder Measurements
An outstanding question in planetary exploration addresses the habitability of icy moons in the outer Solar System. These bodies can harbor liquid water in substantial amounts over...
Grasping the Heterogeneity of the Subsurface: Using Buildup Scenarios for Assessing Flood Risk
Grasping the Heterogeneity of the Subsurface: Using Buildup Scenarios for Assessing Flood Risk
The subsurface plays an important role when assessing flood risk and its build up has to be known in considerable detail to properly determine the chance of flood-protection failur...
Absolute quantification in brain SPECT imaging
Absolute quantification in brain SPECT imaging
Certes malalties neurològiques estan associades amb problemes en els sistemes de neurotransmissió. Una aproximació a l'estudi d'aquests sistemes és la tomografia d'emissió SPECT (S...

Back to Top