Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Unified assembly- and disassembly-line model formulae
View through CrossRef
Purpose
– There is a rich body of literature on sequencing assembly and on sequencing disassembly, but little that either fuses or contrasts the two, which may be valuable for long-range planning in the closed-loop supply chain and simply convenient in terms of consistency in nomenclature and mathematical formulations. The purpose of this paper is to concisely unify and summarize assembly and disassembly formulae – as well as to add new formulations for completeness – and then demonstrate the similarities and differences between assembly and disassembly.
Design/methodology/approach
– Along with several familiar assembly-line formulae which are adapted here for disassembly, five (two specific and three general) metrics and a comparative performance formula from disassembly-line balancing are proposed for use in assembly- and disassembly-line sequencing and balancing either directly, through generalization, or with some extension. The size of assembly and disassembly search spaces are also quantified and formulated. Three new metrics are then developed from each of the general metrics to demonstrate the process of using these general formulae as prototypes.
Findings
– The three new metrics along with several of the original metrics are selectively applied to a simple, notional case study product to be sequenced on an assembly line and then on a disassembly line. Using these analytical results, the inherent differences between assembly and disassembly, even for a seemingly trivial product, are illustrated.
Originality/value
– The research adds several new assembly/disassembly metrics, a case study, unifies the evaluation formulae that assembly and disassembly hold in common as well as structuring prototype formulae for flexibility in generating new evaluation criteria for both, and quantifies (using the case study) how assembly and disassembly – while certainly possessing similarities – also demonstrate measurable differences that can be expected to affect product design, planning, production, and end-of-life processing.
Title: Unified assembly- and disassembly-line model formulae
Description:
Purpose
– There is a rich body of literature on sequencing assembly and on sequencing disassembly, but little that either fuses or contrasts the two, which may be valuable for long-range planning in the closed-loop supply chain and simply convenient in terms of consistency in nomenclature and mathematical formulations.
The purpose of this paper is to concisely unify and summarize assembly and disassembly formulae – as well as to add new formulations for completeness – and then demonstrate the similarities and differences between assembly and disassembly.
Design/methodology/approach
– Along with several familiar assembly-line formulae which are adapted here for disassembly, five (two specific and three general) metrics and a comparative performance formula from disassembly-line balancing are proposed for use in assembly- and disassembly-line sequencing and balancing either directly, through generalization, or with some extension.
The size of assembly and disassembly search spaces are also quantified and formulated.
Three new metrics are then developed from each of the general metrics to demonstrate the process of using these general formulae as prototypes.
Findings
– The three new metrics along with several of the original metrics are selectively applied to a simple, notional case study product to be sequenced on an assembly line and then on a disassembly line.
Using these analytical results, the inherent differences between assembly and disassembly, even for a seemingly trivial product, are illustrated.
Originality/value
– The research adds several new assembly/disassembly metrics, a case study, unifies the evaluation formulae that assembly and disassembly hold in common as well as structuring prototype formulae for flexibility in generating new evaluation criteria for both, and quantifies (using the case study) how assembly and disassembly – while certainly possessing similarities – also demonstrate measurable differences that can be expected to affect product design, planning, production, and end-of-life processing.
Related Results
Ordered release of genomic RNA during icosahedral virus disassembly
Ordered release of genomic RNA during icosahedral virus disassembly
AbstractTo release their genomic cargo, many icosahedral viruses undergo a series of ordered conformational changes via distinct disassembly intermediates that allow nucleic acid e...
The interplay between molten globules and heme disassociation defines human hemoglobin disassembly
The interplay between molten globules and heme disassociation defines human hemoglobin disassembly
AbstractHemoglobin functions as an oxygen transport protein, with each subunit containing a heme cofactor. We have developed a global disassembly model for human hemoglobin, linkin...
Research on the Assembly Sequence of a Ship Block Based on the Disassembly Interference Matrix
Research on the Assembly Sequence of a Ship Block Based on the Disassembly Interference Matrix
Reasonable optimized block assembly sequence has vital practical significance for ship construction, and the research has been done in this article at the aim of obtaining optimal ...
Systematic Research on Auto Assembly and Disassembly of Small Engine in Aircraft
Systematic Research on Auto Assembly and Disassembly of Small Engine in Aircraft
Abstract
The engine is one of the key core components in aircraft, in order to enhance automation and efficiency in the process of installation and disassembly for c...
Research of Partial Destructive based Selective Disassembly Sequence
Planning
Research of Partial Destructive based Selective Disassembly Sequence
Planning
In the process of recycling EOL (end of life) products, disassembly is an important stage. Moreover, there are
several targets for disassembly: reuse, remanufacturing and material ...
Fuzzy-Clustering Based Cost Modeling of Disassembly Planning for EOL
Products
Fuzzy-Clustering Based Cost Modeling of Disassembly Planning for EOL
Products
Cost model is a key issue in the disassembly process planning, because the optimized disassembly sequence is
determined by ranking several possible disassembly operations. In this ...
Mitotic lamin disassembly is triggered by lipid-mediated signaling
Mitotic lamin disassembly is triggered by lipid-mediated signaling
Disassembly of the nuclear lamina is a key step during open mitosis in higher eukaryotes. The activity of several kinases, including CDK1 (cyclin-dependent kinase 1) and protein ki...
A Graph Based Heuristic Approach to Automated Assembly Planning
A Graph Based Heuristic Approach to Automated Assembly Planning
Abstract
Automatic generation of product assembly sequence is essential for robotic assembly task planning. In this paper, a graph-based heuristic approach is presen...

