Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Outcomes of Epidural Steroid Injections as a Conservative Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
View through CrossRef
Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a degenerative condition characterized by the narrowing of the spinal canal in the lower back, resulting in debilitating symptoms. While surgery is often considered for severe cases, alternative conservative treatments are sought for managing mild to moderate LSS. Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) have emerged as a non-surgical option to improve pain and functional outcomes. Objective: This aims to study the outcomes of rehabilitation approaches, specifically focusing on the use of ESIs as a conservative treatment for LSS. Methods: A prospective study was performed in the Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Rajshahi Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh. A total of 33 patients diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) were randomly assigned in to three groups. Group 1 (n = 13) under- went a 2-week inpatient physical therapy program, group 2 (n = 10)received epidural steroid injections, and group 3 (n = 10) served as the control group. The efficacy and safety of ESIs in LSS management. pain and functional assessment scores, such as the Roland Morris Disability Index (RMDI) and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) physical activity subscore, were applied to evaluate the outcomes of the interventions at the end of 2nd week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months of the follow up compering with the control group (group 3, without any intervention) Results: At the end of the 2nd week, both the epidural steroid and physical therapy groups exhibited notable improvements in pain and functional parameters, with no significant difference observed between the two treatment groups. Additionally, the control group also showed significant improvements. Conclusion: Epidural steroid injections and physical therapy both seem to be effective in LSS patients up to 6 months of follow-up. It provides short-term pain relief and func- tional improvement. While the long-term efficacy remains uncertain, ESIs can be a valuable component of a comprehensive rehabilitation approach for managing LSS. Careful patient selection, optimal dosing, and close monitoring are essential to maximize the benefits and minimize the risks associated with ESIs. Further research is warranted to clarify the long-term outcomes and refine the utilization of ESIs in the conservative management of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Title: Outcomes of Epidural Steroid Injections as a Conservative Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Description:
Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a degenerative condition characterized by the narrowing of the spinal canal in the lower back, resulting in debilitating symptoms.
While surgery is often considered for severe cases, alternative conservative treatments are sought for managing mild to moderate LSS.
Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) have emerged as a non-surgical option to improve pain and functional outcomes.
Objective: This aims to study the outcomes of rehabilitation approaches, specifically focusing on the use of ESIs as a conservative treatment for LSS.
Methods: A prospective study was performed in the Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Rajshahi Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh.
A total of 33 patients diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) were randomly assigned in to three groups.
Group 1 (n = 13) under- went a 2-week inpatient physical therapy program, group 2 (n = 10)received epidural steroid injections, and group 3 (n = 10) served as the control group.
The efficacy and safety of ESIs in LSS management.
pain and functional assessment scores, such as the Roland Morris Disability Index (RMDI) and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) physical activity subscore, were applied to evaluate the outcomes of the interventions at the end of 2nd week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months of the follow up compering with the control group (group 3, without any intervention) Results: At the end of the 2nd week, both the epidural steroid and physical therapy groups exhibited notable improvements in pain and functional parameters, with no significant difference observed between the two treatment groups.
Additionally, the control group also showed significant improvements.
Conclusion: Epidural steroid injections and physical therapy both seem to be effective in LSS patients up to 6 months of follow-up.
It provides short-term pain relief and func- tional improvement.
While the long-term efficacy remains uncertain, ESIs can be a valuable component of a comprehensive rehabilitation approach for managing LSS.
Careful patient selection, optimal dosing, and close monitoring are essential to maximize the benefits and minimize the risks associated with ESIs.
Further research is warranted to clarify the long-term outcomes and refine the utilization of ESIs in the conservative management of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Related Results
Radiological Analysis of Sagittal and Cross-sectional Morphology of Congenital Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Radiological Analysis of Sagittal and Cross-sectional Morphology of Congenital Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Abstract
Background Purpose This retrospective study was applied to investigate the morphology characteristics of the spine and pelvis in patients with congenital spinal s...
Effect Comparison Of MIS-TLIF Under MED and Quadrant Modes in The Treatment of Lu mbar Spinal Stenosis
Effect Comparison Of MIS-TLIF Under MED and Quadrant Modes in The Treatment of Lu mbar Spinal Stenosis
Background Lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the common causes of low back and leg pain. Lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration leads to the decrease of intervertebral height, the ...
Critical Arterial Stenosis Revisited
Critical Arterial Stenosis Revisited
Abstract
Introduction
Stenosis of an organ/tissue primary artery can produce ischemia or only reduce blood flow reserve. Despit...
PREVALENCE OF EPIDURAL HEMATOMA FOLLOWING CERVICAL EPIDURAL
INJECTIONS IN INTERVENTIONAL PAIN MANAGEMENT SETTINGS: LITERATURE
REVIEW WITH TWO CASE REPORTS
PREVALENCE OF EPIDURAL HEMATOMA FOLLOWING CERVICAL EPIDURAL
INJECTIONS IN INTERVENTIONAL PAIN MANAGEMENT SETTINGS: LITERATURE
REVIEW WITH TWO CASE REPORTS
Epidural injections are performed frequently in
managing chronic neck pain secondary to disc
herniation, spinal stenosis, discogenic pain, and
post cervical surgery syndrome. Major...
Spinal Epidural Abscess in COVID-19 patients
Spinal Epidural Abscess in COVID-19 patients
Abstract
Objective: To report the peculiarities of spinal epidural abscess in COVID-19 patients, because we observed an unusually high number of these patients following th...
Effectiveness of Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection and Lumbar Traction in Lumbar Radiculopathy Due to Intervertebral Disc Herniation: A Comparative Study
Effectiveness of Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection and Lumbar Traction in Lumbar Radiculopathy Due to Intervertebral Disc Herniation: A Comparative Study
Background: Lumbar radiculopathy, commonly caused by intervertebral disc herniation, leads to severe pain and disability. Various non-surgical treatments, including Transforaminal ...
THE ROLE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT ORIENTATION OF CERVICAL SPINAL STENOSIS SYNDROMES
THE ROLE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT ORIENTATION OF CERVICAL SPINAL STENOSIS SYNDROMES
Objectives: To study on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to diagnose the causes of cervical spinal stenosis and contribution to therapeutic orientations in cervical spinal sten...
Prolapsed Lumbar Intervertebral Disc with Lumbar Radiculopathy Management: A Comparative Evaluation of Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection and Lumbar Traction
Prolapsed Lumbar Intervertebral Disc with Lumbar Radiculopathy Management: A Comparative Evaluation of Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection and Lumbar Traction
Background: Lumbar radiculopathy, is commonly caused by intervertebral disc herniation. Non-surgical treatments like Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection (TESI) and lumbar tra...

