Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The submissive chameleon: Third-party inferences from observing mimicry

View through CrossRef
Past research has shown that mimicry has a number of pro-social consequences for interaction partners. However, such research has almost exclusively focused on its effects among interaction dyads. As social interactions are often witnessed by third-party observers, the question arises which inferences perceivers draw from observing mimicry. In the present work, we apply a third-party perspective to mimicry and test whether observers perceive mimicking individuals as submissive. Experiment 1 confirmed our prediction and found that observers perceived a mimicking person as less dominant, and thus more submissive, than a mimicked person. Experiment 2 replicated this finding and ruled out possible demand effects. Experiment 3 showed that when an interaction partner does not mimic the movements initiated by another person, the interaction partner gains dominance in the eye of the observer. Experiment 4 demonstrates that the inferences that perceivers draw from observing mimicry partly rely on a mere action-response pattern. These findings have not only important implications for mimicry as a genuinely social phenomenon, but also for research on impression management and person perception.
Center for Open Science
Title: The submissive chameleon: Third-party inferences from observing mimicry
Description:
Past research has shown that mimicry has a number of pro-social consequences for interaction partners.
However, such research has almost exclusively focused on its effects among interaction dyads.
As social interactions are often witnessed by third-party observers, the question arises which inferences perceivers draw from observing mimicry.
In the present work, we apply a third-party perspective to mimicry and test whether observers perceive mimicking individuals as submissive.
Experiment 1 confirmed our prediction and found that observers perceived a mimicking person as less dominant, and thus more submissive, than a mimicked person.
Experiment 2 replicated this finding and ruled out possible demand effects.
Experiment 3 showed that when an interaction partner does not mimic the movements initiated by another person, the interaction partner gains dominance in the eye of the observer.
Experiment 4 demonstrates that the inferences that perceivers draw from observing mimicry partly rely on a mere action-response pattern.
These findings have not only important implications for mimicry as a genuinely social phenomenon, but also for research on impression management and person perception.

Related Results

KESETIAAN DAN KEBUASAN TOKOH BINATANG PENURUT DALAM KUMCER SESAT PIKIR PARA BINATANG
KESETIAAN DAN KEBUASAN TOKOH BINATANG PENURUT DALAM KUMCER SESAT PIKIR PARA BINATANG
The author must have a certain intention when displaying a character in his work. In the short story book Sesat Pikir Para Binatang (SPPB), the author, Triyanto Triwikromo, display...
Tightly security code based two tier signature using chameleon hash functions
Tightly security code based two tier signature using chameleon hash functions
Abstract The advancement of quantum algorithms threatens traditional digital signatures, prompting the exploration of post-quantum solutions such as code-based signatures w...
Reinventing the Party Wall - For Quality City Living
Reinventing the Party Wall - For Quality City Living
<p><b>The party wall is a commonly used building element that is rarely exploited to its full potential due to structural and legal complications. The party wall was in...
Why Do We Mimic? A Predictive Framework for Automatic Mimicry
Why Do We Mimic? A Predictive Framework for Automatic Mimicry
Automatic mimicry, where social animals mimic the emotional expressions of others, is a well-documented phenomenon. While research has extensively examined how being mimicked influ...
Political Party Systems in East and Southeast Asia
Political Party Systems in East and Southeast Asia
This article reviews academic work on party systems—defined as the patterns of interactions between political parties—in East and Southeast Asia (hereafter “East Asia”). Before dra...
The Effect of Chameleon Leadership on Employee Grievances
The Effect of Chameleon Leadership on Employee Grievances
The purpose of this empirical study is to investigate the impact of chameleon leadership style on employee grievances from the perspective of employees in Komar University in Sulay...
The Influence of Internal Conflict on Party Institutionalization: Case Study of the Democratic Party 2010-2015
The Influence of Internal Conflict on Party Institutionalization: Case Study of the Democratic Party 2010-2015
This study was motivated by conflicts that occurred within the Democratic Party and aimed to be able to see the development of the institutionalization of the Democratic Party both...
The Polish Party in Crisis, 1980–1982
The Polish Party in Crisis, 1980–1982
Over the last three years, the Polish United Workers’ Party has suffered a major crisis, the most substantial crisis of any Communist party in any Communist party state. The disint...

Back to Top