Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Lawrence and the Common People

View through CrossRef
Like Paul in Sons and Lovers (1913), Lawrence was born into the “common people.” However, both artists’ work offered them the opportunity to climb the social ladder into the middle-classes. But Paul shocks his ambitious mother by declaring “I don’t want to belong to the well-to-do middle classes […] I belong to the common people.” In his essay “Which Class I Belong To” (1927), Lawrence summarised his own position as, by choice, of belonging to neither class. Nevertheless, these texts demonstrate Lawrence’s sustained interest in class and how he saw language as fundamental to class distinction. In his work only the “common people” speak dialect, whereas the middle-classes speak “the King’s English” also known as “the Oxford Voice,” something Lawrence mocked in his poem of the same name.This paper will look at these works, together with Lady Chatterley’s Lover (1928), to explore how Lawrence used language to not only differentiate between the classes but also to signify the characteristics that he associated with these two classes of people. In addition, it will consider Lawrence’s relationship with the “common people” and question whether his declaration of his classless state was realistic - or wishful thinking.
Title: Lawrence and the Common People
Description:
Like Paul in Sons and Lovers (1913), Lawrence was born into the “common people.
” However, both artists’ work offered them the opportunity to climb the social ladder into the middle-classes.
But Paul shocks his ambitious mother by declaring “I don’t want to belong to the well-to-do middle classes […] I belong to the common people.
” In his essay “Which Class I Belong To” (1927), Lawrence summarised his own position as, by choice, of belonging to neither class.
Nevertheless, these texts demonstrate Lawrence’s sustained interest in class and how he saw language as fundamental to class distinction.
In his work only the “common people” speak dialect, whereas the middle-classes speak “the King’s English” also known as “the Oxford Voice,” something Lawrence mocked in his poem of the same name.
This paper will look at these works, together with Lady Chatterley’s Lover (1928), to explore how Lawrence used language to not only differentiate between the classes but also to signify the characteristics that he associated with these two classes of people.
In addition, it will consider Lawrence’s relationship with the “common people” and question whether his declaration of his classless state was realistic - or wishful thinking.

Related Results

On Flores Island, do "ape-men" still exist? https://www.sapiens.org/biology/flores-island-ape-men/
On Flores Island, do "ape-men" still exist? https://www.sapiens.org/biology/flores-island-ape-men/
<span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="background:#f9f9f4"><span style="line-height:normal"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><b><spa...
D.H. Lawrence And Cornwall
D.H. Lawrence And Cornwall
This book examines D.H. Lawrence’s attempt to create a utopian community of likeminded idealists in Cornwall, a quest that was given greater urgency by the outbreak of the First Wo...
D.H. Lawrence, Lady Chatterley’s Lover and “Popular” Editions
D.H. Lawrence, Lady Chatterley’s Lover and “Popular” Editions
In “Accumulated Mail” (1925) Lawrence wrote that “it’s no fun, writing unpopular books” (RDP 239). But he was keen to see his books sold. When Lady Chatterley’s Lover (1928) was wi...
Lawrence in Biofiction
Lawrence in Biofiction
This chapter explores the ways in which Lawrence and the ‘Lawrentian type’ is represented in biofiction from 1916 to 2018. The first sections assess pen portraits of Lawrence in th...
D. H. Lawrence: Icon
D. H. Lawrence: Icon
This chapter takes a double portrait by Dorothy Brett of D. H. Lawrence as Christ and Pan as the starting point for an analysis of how Lawrence has been apprehended – both positive...
‘My dear Garnett … why do you take so much trouble for me?’: Edward Garnett, ‘Friend and Protector’
‘My dear Garnett … why do you take so much trouble for me?’: Edward Garnett, ‘Friend and Protector’
Arguing that traditional criticism on Lawrence’s literary career has studied certain figures such as the publisher’s reader Edward Garnett largely in one-dimensional terms, Chapter...
Lawrence Set to Music
Lawrence Set to Music
This chapter considers a number of ways in which musical composers have engaged with and assimilated Lawrence’s poetry (as well as some of his other works and, indeed, his life sto...
Lawrence and Twenty-First-Century Film
Lawrence and Twenty-First-Century Film
This chapter examines five film adaptations of Lawrence’s works released between 2002 and 2014. Two films (Odour of Chrysanthemums and Lady Chatterley et l'homme des bois) exemplif...

Back to Top