Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Disparities in African-American patient enrollment in pivotal phase 3 immunotherapy trials that led to FDA drug approval in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
View through CrossRef
99 Background: Blacks/African American have historically been underrepresented in enrollment into clinical trials. This leads to uncertainty regarding the efficacy and tolerability of treatments in this patient population following drug approval by the FDA. One of the approval criterion for the FDA is the patient population represents the diversity of patient population in the US as argued by the US FDA in the ORIENT-11 trial (NCT03607539). We abstracted the percentage of African-American into clinical enrolled into pivotal randomized phase 3 trials that led to approval of immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC. Methods: We abstracted the racial composition of randomized phase 3 trials that led to immunotherapy approval including neoadjuvant, adjuvant, consolidation/maintenance, first line and second line indication of immunotherapy in the U.S. Results: We identified a total of 20 randomized phase 3 trials that led to immunotherapy indication in NSCLC by the FDA including neoadjuvant (N = 1), adjuvant (N = 2), consolidation/maintenance (N = 1), first-line (N = 12), and second line (N = 4). We excluded 3 trials (ENPOWER-Lung01, -Lung03, and Checkmate-227) that did not report the racial composition of the patient participants. A total of 12490 subjects participated in the 17 trials analyzed. Of these, 66.3% were male and 33.7% were female. Distribution by race revealed 75.7% White (range 55.9% - 94.3%); 1.9% African-American (range 0.03% - 3.6%); 18.6% Asian (range 1.3% - 34.6%); and 3.8% (0.5% - 7.6%) were either mixed race, American Indian, Pacific Islander or unknown. Conclusions: African-Americans comprised an estimated 13.6% of the U.S. population respectively but our survey indicated only 1.9% of the trial population that led to immunotherapy approval in the US were African-Americans. The patient population in the clinical trials leading to immunotherapy regimen approval in the U.S. significantly under-represented African-Americans and here the true efficacy of and potential unknown adverse events of immunotherapy in African-Americans may over- or under-estimated. The U.S. FDA has the power to approve immunotherapy trials that are more representative of the US population.
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Title: Disparities in African-American patient enrollment in pivotal phase 3 immunotherapy trials that led to FDA drug approval in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Description:
99 Background: Blacks/African American have historically been underrepresented in enrollment into clinical trials.
This leads to uncertainty regarding the efficacy and tolerability of treatments in this patient population following drug approval by the FDA.
One of the approval criterion for the FDA is the patient population represents the diversity of patient population in the US as argued by the US FDA in the ORIENT-11 trial (NCT03607539).
We abstracted the percentage of African-American into clinical enrolled into pivotal randomized phase 3 trials that led to approval of immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC.
Methods: We abstracted the racial composition of randomized phase 3 trials that led to immunotherapy approval including neoadjuvant, adjuvant, consolidation/maintenance, first line and second line indication of immunotherapy in the U.
S.
Results: We identified a total of 20 randomized phase 3 trials that led to immunotherapy indication in NSCLC by the FDA including neoadjuvant (N = 1), adjuvant (N = 2), consolidation/maintenance (N = 1), first-line (N = 12), and second line (N = 4).
We excluded 3 trials (ENPOWER-Lung01, -Lung03, and Checkmate-227) that did not report the racial composition of the patient participants.
A total of 12490 subjects participated in the 17 trials analyzed.
Of these, 66.
3% were male and 33.
7% were female.
Distribution by race revealed 75.
7% White (range 55.
9% - 94.
3%); 1.
9% African-American (range 0.
03% - 3.
6%); 18.
6% Asian (range 1.
3% - 34.
6%); and 3.
8% (0.
5% - 7.
6%) were either mixed race, American Indian, Pacific Islander or unknown.
Conclusions: African-Americans comprised an estimated 13.
6% of the U.
S.
population respectively but our survey indicated only 1.
9% of the trial population that led to immunotherapy approval in the US were African-Americans.
The patient population in the clinical trials leading to immunotherapy regimen approval in the U.
S.
significantly under-represented African-Americans and here the true efficacy of and potential unknown adverse events of immunotherapy in African-Americans may over- or under-estimated.
The U.
S.
FDA has the power to approve immunotherapy trials that are more representative of the US population.
Related Results
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that promotes antitumor immunity. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety...
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
Registration, publication, and outcome reporting among pivotal clinical trials that supported FDA approval of high-risk cardiovascular devices before and after FDAAA
Registration, publication, and outcome reporting among pivotal clinical trials that supported FDA approval of high-risk cardiovascular devices before and after FDAAA
Abstract
Background
Selective registration, publication, and outcome reporting of clinical trials distort the primary clinical evidence that is avai...
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract
A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
Patient-centered perspectives: Examining quality-of-life integration in phase III lung cancer trials (2019-2023).
Patient-centered perspectives: Examining quality-of-life integration in phase III lung cancer trials (2019-2023).
e23181 Background: In the dynamic landscape of lung cancer treatment, marked by precision medicine advancements, addressing the persistent global health challenge of lung cancer r...

