Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Classification
View through CrossRef
Abstract
A biological classification is a hierarchical arrangement of species, subspecific units and higher taxa, with the corresponding scientific nomenclature; classification is also the part of systematic biology concerned with generating such an arrangement. Scientific classifications have ancient roots in folk taxonomies. Between the classical Antiquity and the Renaissance, major conceptual advancement were due to Aristotle and Cesalpino, but modern classifications owe mainly to John Ray and eventually to Linnaeus, who introduced binominal nomenclature. Modern classifications are increasingly aiming to mirror phylogenetic relationships, an effort that may eventually require abandoning the traditional Linnaean ranks such as the genus, the family, the order and the class. Nomenclature is ruled by international codes – these provide rules for introducing new names and for selecting the names to be used in the case of conflict between synonymous or homonymous names.
Key Concepts:
Main steps on the way from naif folk taxonomies to the modern scientific classification initiated by Linnaeus were provided by Aristotle, Andrea Cesalpino and John Ray.
Linnaeus introduced the binomial nomenclature still in use in zoology and botany for the scientific names of species.
Georges Buffon defined the species as a reproductive community, members of which can freely interbreed, thus generating fertile offspring, whereas members of different species, even if similar, cannot breed with them.
For a classification, the equation natural=evolution‐based was clearly reinforced by Charles Darwin's (1809–1882) work, especially by his
On the Origin of Species
(1859). However, Darwin also introduced into biological systematics a potentially disruptive thought: that the species, the hitherto undisputed units of biological classifications, are subject to steady change. In Darwin's own words, species differ from varieties only by matter of degree.
With Charles Darwin, evolutionary biology provided the foundation for a natural classification mirroring genealogical relationships, a research programme actually launched by Willi Hennig one century later.
The last few decades of the twentieth century witnessed heated debates on the theoretical foundations and methodological aspects of biological systematics among the phenetic, cladistics and evolutionary schools.
The traditional Linnaean classification of living beings has the structure of a hierarchy, with a series of ranks or categories (species, genus, family, order, class, phylum and kingdom).
The Linnaean hierarchy has been criticised as its use takes for granted a branched topology and requires acknowledging absolute ranks, rather than simple relations of inclusive nesting.
Biological nomenclature is governed by international codes whose rules are intended to provide unique and universally accepted names for any recognised taxon (species, infraspecific entity or supraspecific group).
Conflicts between synonyms (different names for the same taxon) or homonyms (same name for different taxa) are basically resolved by application of a principle of priority.
Title: Classification
Description:
Abstract
A biological classification is a hierarchical arrangement of species, subspecific units and higher taxa, with the corresponding scientific nomenclature; classification is also the part of systematic biology concerned with generating such an arrangement.
Scientific classifications have ancient roots in folk taxonomies.
Between the classical Antiquity and the Renaissance, major conceptual advancement were due to Aristotle and Cesalpino, but modern classifications owe mainly to John Ray and eventually to Linnaeus, who introduced binominal nomenclature.
Modern classifications are increasingly aiming to mirror phylogenetic relationships, an effort that may eventually require abandoning the traditional Linnaean ranks such as the genus, the family, the order and the class.
Nomenclature is ruled by international codes – these provide rules for introducing new names and for selecting the names to be used in the case of conflict between synonymous or homonymous names.
Key Concepts:
Main steps on the way from naif folk taxonomies to the modern scientific classification initiated by Linnaeus were provided by Aristotle, Andrea Cesalpino and John Ray.
Linnaeus introduced the binomial nomenclature still in use in zoology and botany for the scientific names of species.
Georges Buffon defined the species as a reproductive community, members of which can freely interbreed, thus generating fertile offspring, whereas members of different species, even if similar, cannot breed with them.
For a classification, the equation natural=evolution‐based was clearly reinforced by Charles Darwin's (1809–1882) work, especially by his
On the Origin of Species
(1859).
However, Darwin also introduced into biological systematics a potentially disruptive thought: that the species, the hitherto undisputed units of biological classifications, are subject to steady change.
In Darwin's own words, species differ from varieties only by matter of degree.
With Charles Darwin, evolutionary biology provided the foundation for a natural classification mirroring genealogical relationships, a research programme actually launched by Willi Hennig one century later.
The last few decades of the twentieth century witnessed heated debates on the theoretical foundations and methodological aspects of biological systematics among the phenetic, cladistics and evolutionary schools.
The traditional Linnaean classification of living beings has the structure of a hierarchy, with a series of ranks or categories (species, genus, family, order, class, phylum and kingdom).
The Linnaean hierarchy has been criticised as its use takes for granted a branched topology and requires acknowledging absolute ranks, rather than simple relations of inclusive nesting.
Biological nomenclature is governed by international codes whose rules are intended to provide unique and universally accepted names for any recognised taxon (species, infraspecific entity or supraspecific group).
Conflicts between synonyms (different names for the same taxon) or homonyms (same name for different taxa) are basically resolved by application of a principle of priority.
Related Results
Improving Medical Document Classification via Feature Engineering
Improving Medical Document Classification via Feature Engineering
<p dir="ltr">Document classification (DC) is the task of assigning the predefined labels to unseen documents by utilizing the model trained on the available labeled documents...
COMPARATIVE DESCRIPTION OF THE DANIS-WEBER, AO, LAUGE HANSEN AND DIAS-TACHDJIAN CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS FOR ANKLE FRACTURES
COMPARATIVE DESCRIPTION OF THE DANIS-WEBER, AO, LAUGE HANSEN AND DIAS-TACHDJIAN CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS FOR ANKLE FRACTURES
Introduction: Ankle fractures are very common in emergency departments around the world. Through time and scientific advances, several means of classification have been structured ...
Optimising tool wear and workpiece condition monitoring via cyber-physical systems for smart manufacturing
Optimising tool wear and workpiece condition monitoring via cyber-physical systems for smart manufacturing
Smart manufacturing has been developed since the introduction of Industry 4.0. It consists of resource sharing and networking, predictive engineering, and material and data analyti...
P–331 The #Enzian classification: A comprehensive non-invasive and surgical description system for endometriosis
P–331 The #Enzian classification: A comprehensive non-invasive and surgical description system for endometriosis
Abstract
Study question
Is there a classification for a complete mapping of endometriosis, including anatomical location, size o...
Deep Learning-Based Ensemble Two-Step Classification of Medical Images Using CNN Architectures and Ensemble Methods
Deep Learning-Based Ensemble Two-Step Classification of Medical Images Using CNN Architectures and Ensemble Methods
Breast cancer remains one of the most common cancers amongst women globally. Early detection is crucial for improving survival rates. While mammography is widely used and an effect...
One- and Two-Phase Software Requirement Classification Using Ensemble Deep Learning
One- and Two-Phase Software Requirement Classification Using Ensemble Deep Learning
Recently, deep learning (DL) has been utilized successfully in different fields, achieving remarkable results. Thus, there is a noticeable focus on DL approaches to automate softwa...
Improving Typical Urban Land-Use Classification with Active-Passive Remote Sensing and Multi-Attention Modules Hybrid Network: A Case Study of Qibin District, Henan, China
Improving Typical Urban Land-Use Classification with Active-Passive Remote Sensing and Multi-Attention Modules Hybrid Network: A Case Study of Qibin District, Henan, China
The study of high-precision land-use classification is essential for the sustainable development of land resources. This study addresses the problem of classification errors in opt...
Afaan Oromo Multi-Label News Text Classification Using Deep Learning Approach
Afaan Oromo Multi-Label News Text Classification Using Deep Learning Approach
Abstract
Classification is a technique for categorizing textual data into a form of predefined categories. Due to its major consequences in regard to critical tasks such as...

