Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Understanding Proppant Flowback

View through CrossRef
Abstract Proppant production from hydraulically fractured wells can cause severe operational problems, increase safety concerns, and dramatically reduce economic returns on well-stimulation investments. Methods that have helped eliminate or minimize proppant flowback include modified completion designs, the use of controlled fracture closure for obtaining early closure on the proppant pack, and the use of materials designed to reduce proppant production. Curable resin-coated proppants, chopped fiberglass, thermoplastic strips, and chemicals that modify the surface of the proppant are all accepted methods for minimizing flowback. This paper presents the results of both physical and numerical modeling of proppant flowback recorded during the development of a chemical designed for modifying the proppant surface. The goal of this study was to develop an understanding of the mechanisms that control proppant flowback. Laboratory experiments performed in slot models with no closure stress helped establish the interaction of proppant size, proppant distribution, and fluid velocity. Additional studies of the impact of closure stress, fracture width, and fluid rate on proppant flowback were performed with modified API linear conductivity cells. Data obtained from the physical modeling were used to calibrate a numerical model that predicts proppant flowback. In this model, fluid flow in the proppant pack is described by Darcy's equation for flow through porous media. The resulting velocity distribution allowed local stability to be assessed along the free surface between the proppant pack and the continuous fluid phase. Repeating these steps allowed evaluation of the interface that develops over time.
Title: Understanding Proppant Flowback
Description:
Abstract Proppant production from hydraulically fractured wells can cause severe operational problems, increase safety concerns, and dramatically reduce economic returns on well-stimulation investments.
Methods that have helped eliminate or minimize proppant flowback include modified completion designs, the use of controlled fracture closure for obtaining early closure on the proppant pack, and the use of materials designed to reduce proppant production.
Curable resin-coated proppants, chopped fiberglass, thermoplastic strips, and chemicals that modify the surface of the proppant are all accepted methods for minimizing flowback.
This paper presents the results of both physical and numerical modeling of proppant flowback recorded during the development of a chemical designed for modifying the proppant surface.
The goal of this study was to develop an understanding of the mechanisms that control proppant flowback.
Laboratory experiments performed in slot models with no closure stress helped establish the interaction of proppant size, proppant distribution, and fluid velocity.
Additional studies of the impact of closure stress, fracture width, and fluid rate on proppant flowback were performed with modified API linear conductivity cells.
Data obtained from the physical modeling were used to calibrate a numerical model that predicts proppant flowback.
In this model, fluid flow in the proppant pack is described by Darcy's equation for flow through porous media.
The resulting velocity distribution allowed local stability to be assessed along the free surface between the proppant pack and the continuous fluid phase.
Repeating these steps allowed evaluation of the interface that develops over time.

Related Results

Experimental Investigation on the Effects of Proppant Migration and Placement on the Conductivity in Rough Fractures
Experimental Investigation on the Effects of Proppant Migration and Placement on the Conductivity in Rough Fractures
ABSTRACT Proppant conductivity was usually measured under static or designed proppant concentration. The ISO 13503-5 standard provides specific experimental proce...
Proppant Transport
Proppant Transport
Novotny, E.J., Member of SPE-AIME, Exxon Production Research Co. Abstract A method is presented for predicting:the transport of ...
Proppant Distribution and Flowback in Off-Balance Hydraulic Fractures
Proppant Distribution and Flowback in Off-Balance Hydraulic Fractures
Abstract The vast majority of industrial hydraulic fractures propagate in off-balance mode, where the fracture is not in a single plane, includes many shear fracture...
Dynamic Experiments On Proppant Settling In Crosslinked Fracturing Fluids
Dynamic Experiments On Proppant Settling In Crosslinked Fracturing Fluids
Abstract This paper discusses a study of sand fall characteristics of crosslinked water-based fracturing fluids using a concentric cylinder transparent tester wit...
Mesh Matters: Evaluating the Long-Term Effects of Proppant Size on Stimulation Efficiency in Low-Quality Formations
Mesh Matters: Evaluating the Long-Term Effects of Proppant Size on Stimulation Efficiency in Low-Quality Formations
Abstract This paper evaluates the long-term impact of proppant size selection on hydraulic fracturing performance in the BSO field, where the target formations ar...
Simulation and solution of a proppant migration and sedimentation model for hydraulically fractured inhomogeneously wide fractures
Simulation and solution of a proppant migration and sedimentation model for hydraulically fractured inhomogeneously wide fractures
The distribution of proppant during hydraulic fracturing may directly contribute to the flow conductivity of the proppant fracture, so research on the migration and sedimentation o...
A Novel Selective Fracturing Proppant Applied in Daqing Oilfield
A Novel Selective Fracturing Proppant Applied in Daqing Oilfield
Abstract In the later stage of development, most oilfields faced high water cut issue after treatments. Meanwhile, how to effectively control oil wells water breakth...

Back to Top