Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Understanding Proppant Flowback

View through CrossRef
Abstract Proppant production from hydraulically fractured wells can cause severe operational problems, increase safety concerns, and dramatically reduce economic returns on well-stimulation investments. Methods that have helped eliminate or minimize proppant flowback include modified completion designs, the use of controlled fracture closure for obtaining early closure on the proppant pack, and the use of materials designed to reduce proppant production. Curable resin-coated proppants, chopped fiberglass, thermoplastic strips, and chemicals that modify the surface of the proppant are all accepted methods for minimizing flowback. This paper presents the results of both physical and numerical modeling of proppant flowback recorded during the development of a chemical designed for modifying the proppant surface. The goal of this study was to develop an understanding of the mechanisms that control proppant flowback. Laboratory experiments performed in slot models with no closure stress helped establish the interaction of proppant size, proppant distribution, and fluid velocity. Additional studies of the impact of closure stress, fracture width, and fluid rate on proppant flowback were performed with modified API linear conductivity cells. Data obtained from the physical modeling were used to calibrate a numerical model that predicts proppant flowback. In this model, fluid flow in the proppant pack is described by Darcy's equation for flow through porous media. The resulting velocity distribution allowed local stability to be assessed along the free surface between the proppant pack and the continuous fluid phase. Repeating these steps allowed evaluation of the interface that develops over time.
Title: Understanding Proppant Flowback
Description:
Abstract Proppant production from hydraulically fractured wells can cause severe operational problems, increase safety concerns, and dramatically reduce economic returns on well-stimulation investments.
Methods that have helped eliminate or minimize proppant flowback include modified completion designs, the use of controlled fracture closure for obtaining early closure on the proppant pack, and the use of materials designed to reduce proppant production.
Curable resin-coated proppants, chopped fiberglass, thermoplastic strips, and chemicals that modify the surface of the proppant are all accepted methods for minimizing flowback.
This paper presents the results of both physical and numerical modeling of proppant flowback recorded during the development of a chemical designed for modifying the proppant surface.
The goal of this study was to develop an understanding of the mechanisms that control proppant flowback.
Laboratory experiments performed in slot models with no closure stress helped establish the interaction of proppant size, proppant distribution, and fluid velocity.
Additional studies of the impact of closure stress, fracture width, and fluid rate on proppant flowback were performed with modified API linear conductivity cells.
Data obtained from the physical modeling were used to calibrate a numerical model that predicts proppant flowback.
In this model, fluid flow in the proppant pack is described by Darcy's equation for flow through porous media.
The resulting velocity distribution allowed local stability to be assessed along the free surface between the proppant pack and the continuous fluid phase.
Repeating these steps allowed evaluation of the interface that develops over time.

Related Results

Experimental Investigation on the Effects of Proppant Migration and Placement on the Conductivity in Rough Fractures
Experimental Investigation on the Effects of Proppant Migration and Placement on the Conductivity in Rough Fractures
ABSTRACT Proppant conductivity was usually measured under static or designed proppant concentration. The ISO 13503-5 standard provides specific experimental proce...
Effects of Proppant Selection on Shale Fracture Treatments
Effects of Proppant Selection on Shale Fracture Treatments
This article, written by John Terracina, manager of fracturing technology at Momentive, contains highlights of paper SPE-135502-MS, Proppant Selection and Its Effect on the Results...
Engineering Criteria for Fracture Flowback Procedures
Engineering Criteria for Fracture Flowback Procedures
Abstract Post treatment fracture flowback procedures during closure are often critical to the retention of fracture conductivity near the wellbore. Postfrac producti...
Proppant Transport
Proppant Transport
Novotny, E.J., Member of SPE-AIME, Exxon Production Research Co. Abstract A method is presented for predicting:the transport of ...
Enhanced 2D Proppant Transport Simulation: The Key To Understanding Proppant Flowback and Post-Frac Productivity
Enhanced 2D Proppant Transport Simulation: The Key To Understanding Proppant Flowback and Post-Frac Productivity
Smith, M.B., SPE, NSI Technologies, Bale, A., SPE, STATOIL Britt, L.K., SPE, Amoco Production Co., Hainey, B.W., SPE, ARCO Exploration & Production Technology, Klein, H.K., SPE...
Experimental Study: Determine the Impact of Temperature on Proppant Settling Velocity Utilizing HVFR and Linear Guar
Experimental Study: Determine the Impact of Temperature on Proppant Settling Velocity Utilizing HVFR and Linear Guar
ABSTRACT: Fracture fluids play a significant role in providing good proppant distribution across the entire fracture network during hydraulic fracturing treatment...
Enhanced 2D Proppant-Transport Simulation: The Key To Understanding Proppant Flowback and Post-Frac Productivity
Enhanced 2D Proppant-Transport Simulation: The Key To Understanding Proppant Flowback and Post-Frac Productivity
It has been assumed that along with fluid viscosity and pump rate, gravity dominates final proppant placement in hydraulic fractures. Results here, based on detailed multiphase-flo...

Back to Top