Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Copious Sovereignty in the Henry IV Plays

View through CrossRef
This chapter demonstrates Shakespeare’s extensive use of the rhetorical figure of copia in the two Henry IV plays. Although copia, as the basis for written and verbal expression, is the archetypal figure of Renaissance eloquence, Shakespeare’s writing often pushes its use towards the outer limits, risking a dissipation, rather consolidation of meaning. In these two plays, the generative capacities of copia take a dark turn, linking images of diseased and damaged bodies to a centrifugal movement away from centres of sovereign power. This chapter argues that the dilatory nature of these two plays – in their language and in their proliferation of diseased body parts, as well as in their plot – underscores a representation of sovereignty that sees it as de-centred and dysfunctional.
Edinburgh University Press
Title: Copious Sovereignty in the Henry IV Plays
Description:
This chapter demonstrates Shakespeare’s extensive use of the rhetorical figure of copia in the two Henry IV plays.
Although copia, as the basis for written and verbal expression, is the archetypal figure of Renaissance eloquence, Shakespeare’s writing often pushes its use towards the outer limits, risking a dissipation, rather consolidation of meaning.
In these two plays, the generative capacities of copia take a dark turn, linking images of diseased and damaged bodies to a centrifugal movement away from centres of sovereign power.
This chapter argues that the dilatory nature of these two plays – in their language and in their proliferation of diseased body parts, as well as in their plot – underscores a representation of sovereignty that sees it as de-centred and dysfunctional.

Related Results

The Problem of "Popular" "Sovereignty"
The Problem of "Popular" "Sovereignty"
<p>“Popular sovereignty” is central to liberal democracy, but the concept of sovereignty—the right to rule and make the rules—has many difficulties and ambiguities that have ...
Henry Lives! Learning from Lawson Fandom
Henry Lives! Learning from Lawson Fandom
Since his death in 1922, Henry Lawson’s “spirit” has been kept alive by admirers across Australia. Over the last century, Lawson’s reputation in the academy has fluctuated yet fan ...
A Genealogy of State Sovereignty
A Genealogy of State Sovereignty
AbstractA genealogical account of state sovereignty explores the ways in which the concept has emerged, evolved, and is in decline today. Sovereignty has a theological foundation, ...
The concept of state nuclear sovereignty in the context of globalization
The concept of state nuclear sovereignty in the context of globalization
The article examines the concept of nuclear sovereignty as a component of state sovereignty, a specific element of the legal system, and a new dimension of sovereign rights in the ...
Lock-out, lock-in, and networked sovereignty. Resistance and experimentation in Africa’s trajectory towards AI
Lock-out, lock-in, and networked sovereignty. Resistance and experimentation in Africa’s trajectory towards AI
The conception of digital sovereignty has been associated, especially in the early stages of the diffusion of the Internet, with efforts to keep specific data and information outsi...
The Problem of State Sovereignty in the Context of Deglobalization
The Problem of State Sovereignty in the Context of Deglobalization
The relevance of the research topic is due to the inconsistency of globalist and deglobalist trends in the modern world and their influence on the sovereignty of state actors.The p...
Russia's achievements of technological sovereignty: problems and prospects
Russia's achievements of technological sovereignty: problems and prospects
The article examines certain aspects of the implementation of state policy in the field of scientific and technological development as a basis for achieving technological sovereign...

Back to Top