Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Utility of PET-CT CMR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with DCF for esophageal cancer as a predictive factor of recurrence.

View through CrossRef
434 Background: PET-CT is considered as standard modality for evaluating metastasis of esophageal cancer before treatment. On the other hand, it is unclear whether PET-CT CMR (complete metabolic response) could be useful for assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. To clarify the utility of PET-CT CMR as an adequate modality of prediction for recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with DCF for esophageal cancer. Methods: Fifty-eight cases of esophageal cancer (cStageII-IVa) who received the esophagectomy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy of DCF since June 2013 in Oita University. We evaluated the clinicopathological factors, RFS and OS between CMR group (n=22, 38%) and non-CMR group (n=36, 62%). Results: In the clinical stage before chemotherapy, T-factor was higher in the non-CMR group (p = 0.044), but there were no significant differences of lymph node metastasis (p = 0.27) and stage (p = 0.94) between the two groups. There was no significant difference of the SUV max (16.4 ± 6.5 vs 15.7 ± 6.5, p = 0.98) of the main lesion before chemotherapy and the FDG accumulation rate of lymph nodes (14 cases (63.6%) vs 21 cases) (58.3%), p = 0.69) between the two groups. There were no significant differences of the surgical procedure, lymph node dissection area, number of harvested lymph nodes, amount of bleeding, operation time, curability, and intra/post-operative complications between the two groups. There were 5 cases (15%) with postoperative recurrence in the CMR group (lung 1 case, extra-regional lymph nodes 3 cases, bone 1 case), 17 cases (47%) in the non-CMR group (local 4 cases, lung 3 cases, livers 5 cases, extra regional lymph nodes 6 cases, bone 4 cases, pleura 2 cases), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.062). There were significant differences between the two groups for 3-year RFS (81.3 vs 65.3 months, p=0.021) and 3-year OS (93.8 vs 61.6 months, p=0.011). Conclusions: PET-CR CMR could not predict recurrence at present. PET-CR CMR cases had better prognosis compared to non-CMR cases in terms of 3-year RFS and 3-years OS.
Title: Utility of PET-CT CMR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with DCF for esophageal cancer as a predictive factor of recurrence.
Description:
434 Background: PET-CT is considered as standard modality for evaluating metastasis of esophageal cancer before treatment.
On the other hand, it is unclear whether PET-CT CMR (complete metabolic response) could be useful for assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
To clarify the utility of PET-CT CMR as an adequate modality of prediction for recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with DCF for esophageal cancer.
Methods: Fifty-eight cases of esophageal cancer (cStageII-IVa) who received the esophagectomy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy of DCF since June 2013 in Oita University.
We evaluated the clinicopathological factors, RFS and OS between CMR group (n=22, 38%) and non-CMR group (n=36, 62%).
Results: In the clinical stage before chemotherapy, T-factor was higher in the non-CMR group (p = 0.
044), but there were no significant differences of lymph node metastasis (p = 0.
27) and stage (p = 0.
94) between the two groups.
There was no significant difference of the SUV max (16.
4 ± 6.
5 vs 15.
7 ± 6.
5, p = 0.
98) of the main lesion before chemotherapy and the FDG accumulation rate of lymph nodes (14 cases (63.
6%) vs 21 cases) (58.
3%), p = 0.
69) between the two groups.
There were no significant differences of the surgical procedure, lymph node dissection area, number of harvested lymph nodes, amount of bleeding, operation time, curability, and intra/post-operative complications between the two groups.
There were 5 cases (15%) with postoperative recurrence in the CMR group (lung 1 case, extra-regional lymph nodes 3 cases, bone 1 case), 17 cases (47%) in the non-CMR group (local 4 cases, lung 3 cases, livers 5 cases, extra regional lymph nodes 6 cases, bone 4 cases, pleura 2 cases), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.
062).
There were significant differences between the two groups for 3-year RFS (81.
3 vs 65.
3 months, p=0.
021) and 3-year OS (93.
8 vs 61.
6 months, p=0.
011).
Conclusions: PET-CR CMR could not predict recurrence at present.
PET-CR CMR cases had better prognosis compared to non-CMR cases in terms of 3-year RFS and 3-years OS.

Related Results

Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction  Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...
SEMANA DE ENFERMAGEM E SEUS ASPECTOS SOCIAIS NA VALORIZAÇÃO PROFISSIONAL: UM RELATO DE EXPERIÊNCIA DO GRUPO PET-ENFERMAGEM
SEMANA DE ENFERMAGEM E SEUS ASPECTOS SOCIAIS NA VALORIZAÇÃO PROFISSIONAL: UM RELATO DE EXPERIÊNCIA DO GRUPO PET-ENFERMAGEM
A enfermagem é o pilar da assistência pois está na linha de frente do cuidado holístico, todavia esta é estigmatizada e desvalorizada, assim como não possui reconhecimento consider...
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy and Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy and Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Objectives: To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ...
Comparative study of total-body PET and PET/MR in the diagnosis of liver metastases
Comparative study of total-body PET and PET/MR in the diagnosis of liver metastases
ObjectiveTo compare the diagnostic differences between total-body PET/CT (positron emission tomography/computed tomography) and PET/MR (positron emission tomography/magnetic resona...
Renal Ewing Sarcoma: A Case Report and Literature Review
Renal Ewing Sarcoma: A Case Report and Literature Review
Abstract Introduction Primary renal Ewing sarcoma is an extremely rare and aggressive tumor, representing less than 1% of all renal tumors. This case report contributes valuable in...

Back to Top