Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Utility of PET-CT CMR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with DCF for esophageal cancer as a predictive factor of recurrence.
View through CrossRef
434 Background: PET-CT is considered as standard modality for evaluating metastasis of esophageal cancer before treatment. On the other hand, it is unclear whether PET-CT CMR (complete metabolic response) could be useful for assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. To clarify the utility of PET-CT CMR as an adequate modality of prediction for recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with DCF for esophageal cancer. Methods: Fifty-eight cases of esophageal cancer (cStageII-IVa) who received the esophagectomy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy of DCF since June 2013 in Oita University. We evaluated the clinicopathological factors, RFS and OS between CMR group (n=22, 38%) and non-CMR group (n=36, 62%). Results: In the clinical stage before chemotherapy, T-factor was higher in the non-CMR group (p = 0.044), but there were no significant differences of lymph node metastasis (p = 0.27) and stage (p = 0.94) between the two groups. There was no significant difference of the SUV max (16.4 ± 6.5 vs 15.7 ± 6.5, p = 0.98) of the main lesion before chemotherapy and the FDG accumulation rate of lymph nodes (14 cases (63.6%) vs 21 cases) (58.3%), p = 0.69) between the two groups. There were no significant differences of the surgical procedure, lymph node dissection area, number of harvested lymph nodes, amount of bleeding, operation time, curability, and intra/post-operative complications between the two groups. There were 5 cases (15%) with postoperative recurrence in the CMR group (lung 1 case, extra-regional lymph nodes 3 cases, bone 1 case), 17 cases (47%) in the non-CMR group (local 4 cases, lung 3 cases, livers 5 cases, extra regional lymph nodes 6 cases, bone 4 cases, pleura 2 cases), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.062). There were significant differences between the two groups for 3-year RFS (81.3 vs 65.3 months, p=0.021) and 3-year OS (93.8 vs 61.6 months, p=0.011). Conclusions: PET-CR CMR could not predict recurrence at present. PET-CR CMR cases had better prognosis compared to non-CMR cases in terms of 3-year RFS and 3-years OS.
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Title: Utility of PET-CT CMR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with DCF for esophageal cancer as a predictive factor of recurrence.
Description:
434 Background: PET-CT is considered as standard modality for evaluating metastasis of esophageal cancer before treatment.
On the other hand, it is unclear whether PET-CT CMR (complete metabolic response) could be useful for assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
To clarify the utility of PET-CT CMR as an adequate modality of prediction for recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with DCF for esophageal cancer.
Methods: Fifty-eight cases of esophageal cancer (cStageII-IVa) who received the esophagectomy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy of DCF since June 2013 in Oita University.
We evaluated the clinicopathological factors, RFS and OS between CMR group (n=22, 38%) and non-CMR group (n=36, 62%).
Results: In the clinical stage before chemotherapy, T-factor was higher in the non-CMR group (p = 0.
044), but there were no significant differences of lymph node metastasis (p = 0.
27) and stage (p = 0.
94) between the two groups.
There was no significant difference of the SUV max (16.
4 ± 6.
5 vs 15.
7 ± 6.
5, p = 0.
98) of the main lesion before chemotherapy and the FDG accumulation rate of lymph nodes (14 cases (63.
6%) vs 21 cases) (58.
3%), p = 0.
69) between the two groups.
There were no significant differences of the surgical procedure, lymph node dissection area, number of harvested lymph nodes, amount of bleeding, operation time, curability, and intra/post-operative complications between the two groups.
There were 5 cases (15%) with postoperative recurrence in the CMR group (lung 1 case, extra-regional lymph nodes 3 cases, bone 1 case), 17 cases (47%) in the non-CMR group (local 4 cases, lung 3 cases, livers 5 cases, extra regional lymph nodes 6 cases, bone 4 cases, pleura 2 cases), but there was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.
062).
There were significant differences between the two groups for 3-year RFS (81.
3 vs 65.
3 months, p=0.
021) and 3-year OS (93.
8 vs 61.
6 months, p=0.
011).
Conclusions: PET-CR CMR could not predict recurrence at present.
PET-CR CMR cases had better prognosis compared to non-CMR cases in terms of 3-year RFS and 3-years OS.
Related Results
PS02.116: FEASIBILITY OF DOCETAXEL, CISPLATIN, AND 5-FLUOROURACIL (DCF) VERSUS RADIOTHERAPY WITH DCF (DCF-RT) AS PREOPERATIVE THERAPY FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED ESOPHAGEAL CANCER
PS02.116: FEASIBILITY OF DOCETAXEL, CISPLATIN, AND 5-FLUOROURACIL (DCF) VERSUS RADIOTHERAPY WITH DCF (DCF-RT) AS PREOPERATIVE THERAPY FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED ESOPHAGEAL CANCER
Abstract
Background
In Japan, preoperative chemotherapy with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (CF) followed by radical surgery has ...
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...
SEMANA DE ENFERMAGEM E SEUS ASPECTOS SOCIAIS NA VALORIZAÇÃO PROFISSIONAL: UM RELATO DE EXPERIÊNCIA DO GRUPO PET-ENFERMAGEM
SEMANA DE ENFERMAGEM E SEUS ASPECTOS SOCIAIS NA VALORIZAÇÃO PROFISSIONAL: UM RELATO DE EXPERIÊNCIA DO GRUPO PET-ENFERMAGEM
A enfermagem é o pilar da assistência pois está na linha de frente do cuidado holístico, todavia esta é estigmatizada e desvalorizada, assim como não possui reconhecimento consider...
Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy and Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy and Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Objectives:
To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
...
Comparative study of total-body PET and PET/MR in the diagnosis of liver metastases
Comparative study of total-body PET and PET/MR in the diagnosis of liver metastases
ObjectiveTo compare the diagnostic differences between total-body PET/CT (positron emission tomography/computed tomography) and PET/MR (positron emission tomography/magnetic resona...
Renal Ewing Sarcoma: A Case Report and Literature Review
Renal Ewing Sarcoma: A Case Report and Literature Review
Abstract
Introduction
Primary renal Ewing sarcoma is an extremely rare and aggressive tumor, representing less than 1% of all renal tumors. This case report contributes valuable in...
022. TREATMENT EXPERIENCE OF ESOPHAGEAL FISTULA INDUCED BY NEOADJUVANT THERAPY IN ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE
022. TREATMENT EXPERIENCE OF ESOPHAGEAL FISTULA INDUCED BY NEOADJUVANT THERAPY IN ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE
Abstract
Background
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is typically treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophage...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...

