Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

To Buckle or Not to Buckle - Best Practices for HP/HT Pipelines Lateral Buckling Design in Shallow Water

View through CrossRef
Abstract Mitigation of lateral buckling is one of the key design challenges for HP/HT subsea pipelines. Case studies of lateral buckling designs in shallow water developments are used to examine the merits and shortcomings of the different mitigation techniques. The case studies include both Greenfield and Brownfield developments as well as existing pipelines in operation. The assessment covers the design methodology, design challenges and methodology adopted to overcome those challenges as well as interaction with other pipeline design activities. Key factors such as technical feasibility, constructability and cost-effectiveness of the different mitigation techniques are considered. The different lateral buckling mitigation techniques described are generally applicable to subsea pipelines in shallow water developments. The methods can be classified into two main approaches. The first is to prevent buckling and the second is to allow buckling to occur in a controlled manner. Hence, a key decision for the designer is whether to aim for buckle prevention or buckle control i.e. to buckle or not to buckle. The assessment of the different techniques used for lateral buckling demonstrates that there is no ‘one size fits all’ solution. Unlike deep water applications where buckle prevention might be technically unfeasible or prohibitively expensive, the prevalence of shallow water in the Arabian Gulf region makes both buckle prevention and buckle control generally feasible and cost effective solution. However, each mitigation approach has its own pros and cons as well as limitations on its applicability and therefore the mitigation approach should be determined on a case by case basis based on comprehensive techno-economic assessment. Hence, understanding the merits and shortcomings of the different approaches is considered instrumental for proper selection of lateral buckling mitigation technique. This paper provides guidance to the designer for the selection of mitigation approach through consolidation of the understanding of the merits and shortcomings of typical lateral buckling mitigation techniques in shallow water applications.
Title: To Buckle or Not to Buckle - Best Practices for HP/HT Pipelines Lateral Buckling Design in Shallow Water
Description:
Abstract Mitigation of lateral buckling is one of the key design challenges for HP/HT subsea pipelines.
Case studies of lateral buckling designs in shallow water developments are used to examine the merits and shortcomings of the different mitigation techniques.
The case studies include both Greenfield and Brownfield developments as well as existing pipelines in operation.
The assessment covers the design methodology, design challenges and methodology adopted to overcome those challenges as well as interaction with other pipeline design activities.
Key factors such as technical feasibility, constructability and cost-effectiveness of the different mitigation techniques are considered.
The different lateral buckling mitigation techniques described are generally applicable to subsea pipelines in shallow water developments.
The methods can be classified into two main approaches.
The first is to prevent buckling and the second is to allow buckling to occur in a controlled manner.
Hence, a key decision for the designer is whether to aim for buckle prevention or buckle control i.
e.
to buckle or not to buckle.
The assessment of the different techniques used for lateral buckling demonstrates that there is no ‘one size fits all’ solution.
Unlike deep water applications where buckle prevention might be technically unfeasible or prohibitively expensive, the prevalence of shallow water in the Arabian Gulf region makes both buckle prevention and buckle control generally feasible and cost effective solution.
However, each mitigation approach has its own pros and cons as well as limitations on its applicability and therefore the mitigation approach should be determined on a case by case basis based on comprehensive techno-economic assessment.
Hence, understanding the merits and shortcomings of the different approaches is considered instrumental for proper selection of lateral buckling mitigation technique.
This paper provides guidance to the designer for the selection of mitigation approach through consolidation of the understanding of the merits and shortcomings of typical lateral buckling mitigation techniques in shallow water applications.

Related Results

Experimental Study Of Curvature And Frictional Effects On Buckling
Experimental Study Of Curvature And Frictional Effects On Buckling
ABSTRACT Buckling and post-buckling lock-up place a limit on the reach of extended-reach and horizontal wells. Although buckling has received considerable theoret...
Buckle Arrestors for Deepwater Pipelines
Buckle Arrestors for Deepwater Pipelines
Abstract Progress has been made in the design of buckle arrestors, or more precisely collapse arrestors, for deepwater pipelines. Empirical relationships have bee...
Suction Pile Allowable Suction Pressure Envelopes Based on Soil Failure and Structural Buckling
Suction Pile Allowable Suction Pressure Envelopes Based on Soil Failure and Structural Buckling
Abstract This study develops the allowable suction pressure envelopes using applicable industrial codes for different suction pile sizes at various penetration depth...
Design
Design
Conventional definitions of design rarely capture its reach into our everyday lives. The Design Council, for example, estimates that more than 2.5 million people use design-related...
Out-plane Buckling of Arches with Variable Cross-section
Out-plane Buckling of Arches with Variable Cross-section
Variable cross-section arch is widely used in practical engineering because of its beautiful arc and excellent mechanical properties. However, there is still no systematic and comp...
Buckling Analysis of Extruded Polystyrene Columns with Various Slenderness Ratios
Buckling Analysis of Extruded Polystyrene Columns with Various Slenderness Ratios
Extruded polystyrene (XPS) has recently been used for construction such as in walls, and floors. When it is used for walls, axial load is inevitably applied along the length direct...
Buckling of Concentric String Pipe-in-Pipe
Buckling of Concentric String Pipe-in-Pipe
Abstract During the design stage of concentric tubular strings, the outer string is always considered to be rigid. However, in reality, the outer string can become d...

Back to Top