Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Hoc est corpus
View through CrossRef
This chapter, which has both a historical and an analytic dimension, concerns the ritual of the ‘Eucharist’ or ‘mass’, best known in the Catholic variant of Christianity. The first part of the paper outlines the part of the ritual’s complex history that is concerned with various theological attempts to explain or justify particular interpretations of the ritual that have been the subject of conflict. In particular, it outlines the intellectual history of efforts to apply sophisticated theories of language developed in the medieval period and the early modern period. These approaches already involved a theory of deixis that foreshadows modern theories in linguistics that are entirely non-theological. It is a recent linguistic theory, Deictic Space Theory, that is outlined and applied in second part of the paper. This is a cognitive approach to core aspects of linguistic meaning that are grounded in spatial cognition. The overall aim is to investigate, in context, the possible cognitive and emotional effects that may be brought about by the interaction among linguistic formulae and other features of the ritual. Close linguistic and multimodal analysis of the crucial and most controversial moment of the Eucharist is speculatively linked with known psychological, cognitive, and neural processes.
Title: Hoc est corpus
Description:
This chapter, which has both a historical and an analytic dimension, concerns the ritual of the ‘Eucharist’ or ‘mass’, best known in the Catholic variant of Christianity.
The first part of the paper outlines the part of the ritual’s complex history that is concerned with various theological attempts to explain or justify particular interpretations of the ritual that have been the subject of conflict.
In particular, it outlines the intellectual history of efforts to apply sophisticated theories of language developed in the medieval period and the early modern period.
These approaches already involved a theory of deixis that foreshadows modern theories in linguistics that are entirely non-theological.
It is a recent linguistic theory, Deictic Space Theory, that is outlined and applied in second part of the paper.
This is a cognitive approach to core aspects of linguistic meaning that are grounded in spatial cognition.
The overall aim is to investigate, in context, the possible cognitive and emotional effects that may be brought about by the interaction among linguistic formulae and other features of the ritual.
Close linguistic and multimodal analysis of the crucial and most controversial moment of the Eucharist is speculatively linked with known psychological, cognitive, and neural processes.
Related Results
Quantitative Historical Linguistics
Quantitative Historical Linguistics
An innovative guide to quantitative, corpus-based research in historical and diachronic linguistics, this book provides an original and thoroughly worked-out methodological framewo...
The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research
The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research
The origins of learner corpus research go back to the late 1980s when large electronic collections of written or spoken data started to be collected from foreign/second language le...
Methodology
Methodology
This chapter presents and justifies the use of both a dictionary corpus and a newspaper corpus. The dictionary corpus is used because of the role of the dictionary as linguistic au...
El español hablado en Sevilla Corpus PRESEEA-Sevilla. Vol III Hablantes de instrucción media
El español hablado en Sevilla Corpus PRESEEA-Sevilla. Vol III Hablantes de instrucción media
Los textos que aquí se incluyen, correspondientes al nivel de instrucción media, cierran la publicación del corpus El español hablado en Sevilla. Corpus PRESEEA-Sevilla, iniciada c...
Dio Chrysostom
Dio Chrysostom
This chapter examines the Greek imperial writer Dio Chrysostom’s biography, works, and place within the Second Sophistic. Dio’s corpus is broad and eclectic, including advice to em...
Lithuanian morphologically annotated corpus - MATAS
Lithuanian morphologically annotated corpus - MATAS
MATAS v0.2 - Morphologically annotated Lithuanian corpus (manually checked). Contains 4 parts: documents (21%), fiction (19%), periodicals (36%), scientific texts (24%). Wordform c...
Dix ans de corpus d'auteurs
Dix ans de corpus d'auteurs
De 2011 à 2021, le consortium CAHIER d’Huma-Num a réuni une soixantaine de projets en lettres et langues sur une grande variété de sources (œuvres littéraires, correspondances dive...

