Javascript must be enabled to continue!
288 Multitarget Stool DNA Testing Is for Everyone: Positive Findings in Different Racial Groups
View through CrossRef
INTRODUCTION:
Different ethnic/racial groups may have unique incidences of colorectal cancer with some groups being at higher risk than others. Our study aims to look at outcomes of multitarget stool DNA testing in different racial groups.
METHODS:
There were 19400 patients who had multitarget stool DNA tests ordered. Baseline demographic traits were recorded. Of these, 1413 positive stool DNA tests followed by documented subsequent colonoscopy. A total of 12 patients with unknown racial group/ethnicity, unknown indication and findings of other carcinoma other than adenocarcinoma were excluded from analysis. Only the index lesion was recorded. Advanced adenoma was defined as an adenoma that is larger than 10 mm or had high risk features such as villous transformation or high grade dysplasia. Nonadvanced adenoma was defined as an adenoma that is smaller than 10 mm and had no high risk features. Racial/ethnic groups were divided into white/Caucasian and non-white. Statistical analysis with Chi-square was done to compare the proportions. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS:
Of the patients who had multitarget stool DNA tests ordered, 206 (1.06%) were of Hispanic origin, 53 (0.27%) American Indian or Alaskan Native, 242 (1.25%) Asian, 1131 (5.83%) African American/Black, 1 (0.01%) Native Hawaiian, 5 (0.03%) Other Pacific Islander, 17416 (89.77%) Caucasian/White and 346 (1.78%) of unknown/unreported backgrounds. A total of 1401 patients were analyzed. For the white/Caucasian cohort, 1353 (75.54%) had subsequent colonoscopy compared to 97 (75.19%) of the non-white group (P = 0.93). Adenocarcinoma cases were 22 (1.68%) in white patients versus 2 (2.17%) in the nonwhite group (P = 0.67), advanced adenomas were 401 (30.68%) versus 30 (32.61%) (P = 0.70), nonadvanced adenoma was 388 (29.69%) versus 26 (28.26%) (P = 0.77), and no adenoma was 496 (37.95%) versus 34 (36.96%) (P = 0.85), respectively.
CONCLUSION:
From our study, there is no difference in colonoscopy findings from positive multitarget stool DNA tests between racial groups nor is there a difference in adherence to follow-up colonoscopy. Our study is limited by the number of patients within minority groups.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: 288 Multitarget Stool DNA Testing Is for Everyone: Positive Findings in Different Racial Groups
Description:
INTRODUCTION:
Different ethnic/racial groups may have unique incidences of colorectal cancer with some groups being at higher risk than others.
Our study aims to look at outcomes of multitarget stool DNA testing in different racial groups.
METHODS:
There were 19400 patients who had multitarget stool DNA tests ordered.
Baseline demographic traits were recorded.
Of these, 1413 positive stool DNA tests followed by documented subsequent colonoscopy.
A total of 12 patients with unknown racial group/ethnicity, unknown indication and findings of other carcinoma other than adenocarcinoma were excluded from analysis.
Only the index lesion was recorded.
Advanced adenoma was defined as an adenoma that is larger than 10 mm or had high risk features such as villous transformation or high grade dysplasia.
Nonadvanced adenoma was defined as an adenoma that is smaller than 10 mm and had no high risk features.
Racial/ethnic groups were divided into white/Caucasian and non-white.
Statistical analysis with Chi-square was done to compare the proportions.
A P-value < 0.
05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS:
Of the patients who had multitarget stool DNA tests ordered, 206 (1.
06%) were of Hispanic origin, 53 (0.
27%) American Indian or Alaskan Native, 242 (1.
25%) Asian, 1131 (5.
83%) African American/Black, 1 (0.
01%) Native Hawaiian, 5 (0.
03%) Other Pacific Islander, 17416 (89.
77%) Caucasian/White and 346 (1.
78%) of unknown/unreported backgrounds.
A total of 1401 patients were analyzed.
For the white/Caucasian cohort, 1353 (75.
54%) had subsequent colonoscopy compared to 97 (75.
19%) of the non-white group (P = 0.
93).
Adenocarcinoma cases were 22 (1.
68%) in white patients versus 2 (2.
17%) in the nonwhite group (P = 0.
67), advanced adenomas were 401 (30.
68%) versus 30 (32.
61%) (P = 0.
70), nonadvanced adenoma was 388 (29.
69%) versus 26 (28.
26%) (P = 0.
77), and no adenoma was 496 (37.
95%) versus 34 (36.
96%) (P = 0.
85), respectively.
CONCLUSION:
From our study, there is no difference in colonoscopy findings from positive multitarget stool DNA tests between racial groups nor is there a difference in adherence to follow-up colonoscopy.
Our study is limited by the number of patients within minority groups.
Related Results
287 The Effect of Smoking on Multitarget Stool DNA Testing
287 The Effect of Smoking on Multitarget Stool DNA Testing
INTRODUCTION:
There is a known association between smoking and the development of colorectal cancer. Newer screening tools for colorectal cancer including multitarget s...
Genome wide hypomethylation and youth-associated DNA gap reduction promoting DNA damage and senescence-associated pathogenesis
Genome wide hypomethylation and youth-associated DNA gap reduction promoting DNA damage and senescence-associated pathogenesis
Abstract
Background: Age-associated epigenetic alteration is the underlying cause of DNA damage in aging cells. Two types of youth-associated DNA-protection epigenetic mark...
Echinococcus granulosus in Environmental Samples: A Cross-Sectional Molecular Study
Echinococcus granulosus in Environmental Samples: A Cross-Sectional Molecular Study
Abstract
Introduction
Echinococcosis, caused by tapeworms of the Echinococcus genus, remains a significant zoonotic disease globally. The disease is particularly prevalent in areas...
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
249 Is Stool DNA Test More Specific for Proximal or Distal Neoplasia?
249 Is Stool DNA Test More Specific for Proximal or Distal Neoplasia?
INTRODUCTION:
A handful of studies evaluated stool DNA test as a screening method but there is little to no data on the location of the “positive findings” detected on ...
Yuk Ming Dennis Lo
Yuk Ming Dennis Lo
A propósito do artigo sobre a trissomia 21, incluído neste número da Gazeta Médica, justo é lembrar o Dr. Dennis Lo, o médico (por Oxford), investigador e professor de Patologia Qu...
Cocaine-induced DNA-PK relieves RNAP II pausing by promoting TRIM28 phosphorylation
Cocaine-induced DNA-PK relieves RNAP II pausing by promoting TRIM28 phosphorylation
AbstractDrug abuse continues to pose a significant challenge in HIV control efforts. In our investigation, we discovered that cocaine not only upregulates the expression of DNA-dep...
The Conjugative Relaxase TrwC Promotes Integration of Foreign DNA in the Human Genome
The Conjugative Relaxase TrwC Promotes Integration of Foreign DNA in the Human Genome
ABSTRACT
Bacterial conjugation is a mechanism of horizontal DNA transfer. The relaxase TrwC of the conjugative plasmid R388 cleaves one strand of the transfe...

