Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Designer’s Contribution to the 3D Knit Ecosystem
View through CrossRef
<p>The term 3D knitting is used in popular media and marketing to describe textile products knit in a single, shaped piece, without seams. 3D knit products provide: increased comfort in wearable items, greater product integrity, new design possibilities, reduction in manual labour, and new opportunities to integrate “smart” fibres. Due to the complex machinery and software used for this type of fabrication, designers engaging with 3D knitting require a different mindset compared to traditional cut and sew or knit design processes. This research was framed by the question: What role do designers play in the current 3D knit ecosystem? A secondary question asked: What are the opportunities and challenges in expanding designers’ skills for 3D knitting? Qualitative inquiry was used to examine designers’ experience in the 3D knit ecosystem in Canada and the United States from the perspectives of three primary stakeholders: designers, software technicians (programmers), and production managers (manufacturers). Modified touchstone tours including semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants (n=18) from the three key stakeholder groups at companies (n=10) across Canada and the United States. Thematic analysis was used to identify and organize key themes from the data. Results indicate that 3D knitting provides benefits in five categories: consumer/product, manufacturer, design and development, business strategy, and sustainability. Challenges and roadblocks were identified in four categories for all stakeholders: costs, education and employment, design and development, and communication. Challenges identified by one stakeholder group were frequently mirrored by or connected to the experience of another group. Results suggest that tacit knowledge contributes to the communication bottleneck in the 3D knit ecosystem. As access to 3D knitting increases, designers’ responsibilities and the scope of their considerations in the design and development process must expand. Designers who understand the goals and priorities of the other stakeholder groups are better equipped to successfully navigate the 3D knit design and development process. This research has implications for current practices in textile and apparel production as well as for higher education institutions preparing design students for careers in this evolving industry.</p>
Title: The Designer’s Contribution to the 3D Knit Ecosystem
Description:
<p>The term 3D knitting is used in popular media and marketing to describe textile products knit in a single, shaped piece, without seams.
3D knit products provide: increased comfort in wearable items, greater product integrity, new design possibilities, reduction in manual labour, and new opportunities to integrate “smart” fibres.
Due to the complex machinery and software used for this type of fabrication, designers engaging with 3D knitting require a different mindset compared to traditional cut and sew or knit design processes.
This research was framed by the question: What role do designers play in the current 3D knit ecosystem? A secondary question asked: What are the opportunities and challenges in expanding designers’ skills for 3D knitting? Qualitative inquiry was used to examine designers’ experience in the 3D knit ecosystem in Canada and the United States from the perspectives of three primary stakeholders: designers, software technicians (programmers), and production managers (manufacturers).
Modified touchstone tours including semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants (n=18) from the three key stakeholder groups at companies (n=10) across Canada and the United States.
Thematic analysis was used to identify and organize key themes from the data.
Results indicate that 3D knitting provides benefits in five categories: consumer/product, manufacturer, design and development, business strategy, and sustainability.
Challenges and roadblocks were identified in four categories for all stakeholders: costs, education and employment, design and development, and communication.
Challenges identified by one stakeholder group were frequently mirrored by or connected to the experience of another group.
Results suggest that tacit knowledge contributes to the communication bottleneck in the 3D knit ecosystem.
As access to 3D knitting increases, designers’ responsibilities and the scope of their considerations in the design and development process must expand.
Designers who understand the goals and priorities of the other stakeholder groups are better equipped to successfully navigate the 3D knit design and development process.
This research has implications for current practices in textile and apparel production as well as for higher education institutions preparing design students for careers in this evolving industry.
</p>.
Related Results
The Designer’s Contribution to the 3D Knit Ecosystem
The Designer’s Contribution to the 3D Knit Ecosystem
<p>The term 3D knitting is used in popular media and marketing to describe textile products knit in a single, shaped piece, without seams. 3D knit products provide: increased...
Valuation of Ecosystem Services, Karnataka State, India
Valuation of Ecosystem Services, Karnataka State, India
Humans depend on the environment for their basic needs, such as food, fuel, minerals, water, air, etc. Burgeoning unplanned development activities to cater to the demands of the in...
Ecosystem service assessment of green roofs in Bangkok
Ecosystem service assessment of green roofs in Bangkok
Green roofs are constructed ecosystems that can provide four main types of ecosystem services (regulating, provisioning, cultural, and supporting services). However, most green roo...
Impact of local industry expansion on farmland ecosystem services: A case study of farmland-factories in Changhua County, Taiwan
Impact of local industry expansion on farmland ecosystem services: A case study of farmland-factories in Changhua County, Taiwan
<p>As is known to everyone, the preservation of agricultural landscape plays a crucial role in productivity, sustainability and other ecosystem services of agricultur...
Кey signs of ecosystem assets valuation
Кey signs of ecosystem assets valuation
The purpose of the article is to develop scientific approaches and identify key features of the assessment of ecosystem assets of territorial communities.
The article examine...
Innovation Ecosystems in Management: An Organizing Typology
Innovation Ecosystems in Management: An Organizing Typology
The concept of an “ecosystem” is increasingly used in management and business to describe collectives of heterogeneous, yet complementary organizations who jointly create some kind...
Improving the efficiency of ecosystem evaluation assets related to water
Improving the efficiency of ecosystem evaluation assets related to water
The article develops scientific proposals for a comprehensive evaluation of ecosystem assets of territorial communities related to water in two key areas: 1) to the central executi...
Bridging local and global knowledges to classify, describe and map ecosystems
Bridging local and global knowledges to classify, describe and map ecosystems
Effective ecosystem management for biodiversity and human well-being relies on accurate information. Consistent approaches to classifying, describing, and assessing ecosystems can ...

