Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Lavoisier writes to Fourcroy from prison
View through CrossRef
Abstract
The principal architects of the ‘chemical revolution’ may well be said to have been Antoine Laurent Lavoisier (1743-1794) and Antoine Francois Fourcroy (1755-1809). The former by the intuitive genius of his brain, the extraordinary manipulative skill of his hands and the impeccable logic of his mind elaborated and set forth those truths on which modem chemistry was founded. The latter used his ingratiating and flexible personality, oratorical ability and facile pen to publicize the new chemistry and see that it was embodied in the educational curriculum. Lavoisier helped Fourcroy during his earlier years and used his prestige and influence to advance the younger man and obtain financial preferment for him. Under the ancien régime Lavoisier was rich, respected and influential; Fourcroy led a struggling existence for many years. The French Revolution was to bring Lavoisier misery and legal assassination; the same period saw Fourcroy’s prestige and power rise to a maximum. The relationship existing between the two men presents an as yet unsolved puzzle. Fourcroy’s biography still has to be written, as does an authoritative one of Lavoisier, when all the material is available. The latter’s standard biographer, Edouard Grimaux, wrote three-quarters of a century ago and his work needs to be superseded by an objective and fully documented modern study. Grimaux strongly condemned Fourcroy for allowing Lavoisier to be sent to the guillotine and implies that, possibly motivated by jealousy, he may have helped to speed him on his way. Modern scholars are inclined to the opinion that Grimaux maligned Fourcroy unjustifiably. The charge, however, was evidently current shortly after Lavoisier’s death, for in a speech delivered only two years after the lamentable event Fourcroy felt constrained to defend himself against an accusation which was to haunt him for the rest of his days and pursue him from his own death until the present day.
Title: Lavoisier writes to Fourcroy from prison
Description:
Abstract
The principal architects of the ‘chemical revolution’ may well be said to have been Antoine Laurent Lavoisier (1743-1794) and Antoine Francois Fourcroy (1755-1809).
The former by the intuitive genius of his brain, the extraordinary manipulative skill of his hands and the impeccable logic of his mind elaborated and set forth those truths on which modem chemistry was founded.
The latter used his ingratiating and flexible personality, oratorical ability and facile pen to publicize the new chemistry and see that it was embodied in the educational curriculum.
Lavoisier helped Fourcroy during his earlier years and used his prestige and influence to advance the younger man and obtain financial preferment for him.
Under the ancien régime Lavoisier was rich, respected and influential; Fourcroy led a struggling existence for many years.
The French Revolution was to bring Lavoisier misery and legal assassination; the same period saw Fourcroy’s prestige and power rise to a maximum.
The relationship existing between the two men presents an as yet unsolved puzzle.
Fourcroy’s biography still has to be written, as does an authoritative one of Lavoisier, when all the material is available.
The latter’s standard biographer, Edouard Grimaux, wrote three-quarters of a century ago and his work needs to be superseded by an objective and fully documented modern study.
Grimaux strongly condemned Fourcroy for allowing Lavoisier to be sent to the guillotine and implies that, possibly motivated by jealousy, he may have helped to speed him on his way.
Modern scholars are inclined to the opinion that Grimaux maligned Fourcroy unjustifiably.
The charge, however, was evidently current shortly after Lavoisier’s death, for in a speech delivered only two years after the lamentable event Fourcroy felt constrained to defend himself against an accusation which was to haunt him for the rest of his days and pursue him from his own death until the present day.
Related Results
The Women Who Don’t Get Counted
The Women Who Don’t Get Counted
Photo by Hédi Benyounes on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
The current incarceration facilities for the growing number of women are depriving expecting mothers of adequate care cruci...
Workshop: Better prison health for better public health
Workshop: Better prison health for better public health
Abstract
According to the latest data, in 2018 about 590,000 people were held in prison on any given day in the EU, and more th...
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Photo by niu niu on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
Shackling prisoners has been implemented as standard procedure when transporting prisoners in labor and during childbirth. This procedure ensu...
Ethnography of Prison According to Parajanov
Ethnography of Prison According to Parajanov
In the article, the prison period of Sergei Parajanov’s art is examined – Parajanov served his sentence in 1973–1977 in the high security camps in Ukraine. Following the graphic wo...
Recent Trends in UK Prison Libraries
Recent Trends in UK Prison Libraries
The purpose of this article is to explore and explain the significant developments and trends in prison libraries over the last thirty years. The article includes sections on legis...
The impact of COVID-19 on the mental well-being of prison officers in a developing country
The impact of COVID-19 on the mental well-being of prison officers in a developing country
Purpose
The literature on prison officers highlights the mental health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on prison staff. However, there is limited knowledge about...
INMATES, REPOSITORY OF LINGUISTIC DIVERSITY.
INMATES, REPOSITORY OF LINGUISTIC DIVERSITY.
This study is focused on the repository of linguistics among the inmates in district prison Quetta, the prison was established by the British regime in 1939.the large number of inm...
Fourcroy et Lavoisier, rédacteurs du Prix de l’Académie des sciences sur la nutrition (1792)
Fourcroy et Lavoisier, rédacteurs du Prix de l’Académie des sciences sur la nutrition (1792)
Le document « Prix proposé par l’Académie des sciences pour l’année 1794 » est attribué aujourd’hui à Lavoisier. C’est un texte scientifique important, à plusieurs titres, notammen...

