Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Phrase Structure Grammars
View through CrossRef
Phrase structure grammars model the internal structure of a sentence in terms of a hierarchically organized representation. The sentence Every boy has a bike, for instance, is taken to consist of a noun phrase (every boy) and a verb phrase (has a bike), where the former consists of a determiner (every) and a noun (boy), and the latter of a verb (has) and a noun phrase (a bike), which, in turn, consists of a determiner (a) and a noun (bike). The structure is made explicit by labeled bracketing, as in (S (NP (Det every) (N boy)) (VP (V has) (NP (Det a) (N bike)))), or by a tree. Phrase structure grammars were introduced by Noam Chomsky in the 1950s, building on the tradition of Immediate Constituent Analysis in post-Bloomfieldian structuralism. They played a key role in Transformational Grammar (TG) till the late 1960s, mainly as a descriptive device. The shift toward generalization led to a more abstract version, widely known as X-bar syntax, a staple ingredient of generative syntax throughout the 1970s and the 1980s. The introduction of the Minimalist Program in the 1990s led to further abstraction, involving, among others, the virtual elimination of phrase structure rules. In Non-transformational Grammar, which has its origins in the 1970s, phrase structure grammars continue to thrive, especially in Lexical-Functional Grammar (LFG) and Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG). While phrase structure grammars are mainly used in syntax, they also play a role in other areas of linguistics: they provide a structural backbone for the compositional interpretation of sentences in Semantics and for identifying prosodic units in Phonology. Their role in morphology is a bone of contention: in Transformational Grammar, the smallest units of analysis are morphemes, so that PS grammars extend below the word level. Non-transformational Grammars, by contrast, adopt a lexicalist stance and treat words as syntactic atoms, leaving the expression of sublexical regularities to other devices, such as lexical rules. The Formal Properties of phrase structure grammars have been studied in mathematical linguistics. They play a key role in computational linguistics and Natural Language Processing. Their relevance for the investigation of human language processing is studied in Psycholinguistics.
Title: Phrase Structure Grammars
Description:
Phrase structure grammars model the internal structure of a sentence in terms of a hierarchically organized representation.
The sentence Every boy has a bike, for instance, is taken to consist of a noun phrase (every boy) and a verb phrase (has a bike), where the former consists of a determiner (every) and a noun (boy), and the latter of a verb (has) and a noun phrase (a bike), which, in turn, consists of a determiner (a) and a noun (bike).
The structure is made explicit by labeled bracketing, as in (S (NP (Det every) (N boy)) (VP (V has) (NP (Det a) (N bike)))), or by a tree.
Phrase structure grammars were introduced by Noam Chomsky in the 1950s, building on the tradition of Immediate Constituent Analysis in post-Bloomfieldian structuralism.
They played a key role in Transformational Grammar (TG) till the late 1960s, mainly as a descriptive device.
The shift toward generalization led to a more abstract version, widely known as X-bar syntax, a staple ingredient of generative syntax throughout the 1970s and the 1980s.
The introduction of the Minimalist Program in the 1990s led to further abstraction, involving, among others, the virtual elimination of phrase structure rules.
In Non-transformational Grammar, which has its origins in the 1970s, phrase structure grammars continue to thrive, especially in Lexical-Functional Grammar (LFG) and Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG).
While phrase structure grammars are mainly used in syntax, they also play a role in other areas of linguistics: they provide a structural backbone for the compositional interpretation of sentences in Semantics and for identifying prosodic units in Phonology.
Their role in morphology is a bone of contention: in Transformational Grammar, the smallest units of analysis are morphemes, so that PS grammars extend below the word level.
Non-transformational Grammars, by contrast, adopt a lexicalist stance and treat words as syntactic atoms, leaving the expression of sublexical regularities to other devices, such as lexical rules.
The Formal Properties of phrase structure grammars have been studied in mathematical linguistics.
They play a key role in computational linguistics and Natural Language Processing.
Their relevance for the investigation of human language processing is studied in Psycholinguistics.
Related Results
Evolutionary Grammatical Inference
Evolutionary Grammatical Inference
Grammatical Inference (also known as grammar induction) is the problem of learning a grammar for a language from a set of examples. In a broad sense, some data is presented to the ...
ON A SUPERCLASS OF A-GRAMMARS
ON A SUPERCLASS OF A-GRAMMARS
In this paper we consider a superclass of automaton grammars that can be represented in terms of paths on graphs. With this approach, we assume that vertices of graph are labeled b...
Phrase boundaries lacking word prosody: An articulatory investigation of Seoul Korean
Phrase boundaries lacking word prosody: An articulatory investigation of Seoul Korean
This electromagnetic articulography study explores the kinematic profile of Intonational Phrase boundaries in Seoul Korean. Recent findings suggest that the scope of phrase-final l...
FRASA BAHASA MAIRASI (PHRASES IN MAIRASI LANGUAGE)
FRASA BAHASA MAIRASI (PHRASES IN MAIRASI LANGUAGE)
Frase hanya mengisi satu fungsi dalam klausa. Untuk memperkuat klarifikasi di atas dikutip satu pengertian frasa pendukung yang dibuat oleh Elson Pickket dan (1976: 73), yaitu “Fra...
Frasa Bahasa Wate
Frasa Bahasa Wate
Various meaning and definition phrase have been made by various writer, but is not quit of congeniality phrase as a group word. In consequence, phrase basically [is] word group. If...
IMPLEMENTATION OF (XP, YP) REPRESENTATION TO AWGNI STRUCTURAL TYPE SENTENCES
IMPLEMENTATION OF (XP, YP) REPRESENTATION TO AWGNI STRUCTURAL TYPE SENTENCES
The objective of this study was designed to implement {XP, YP} representations in an attempt to examine Awgni structural type sentences. A descriptive study design and purposive sa...
Unification Grammars
Unification Grammars
Grammars of natural languages can be expressed as mathematical objects, similar to computer programs. Such a formal presentation of grammars facilitates mathematical reasoning with...
THE PHRASES IN KARO LANGUAGE
THE PHRASES IN KARO LANGUAGE
This study describes the various types and the function of phrase in Karo language. Based on the form, phrase can be distinguished into coordinative phrase, modifier phrase, and ex...

