Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Real-World Outcomes of Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treated with Teclistamab and Talquetamab; A Multicenter Analysis from the Greek Myeloma Study Group

View through CrossRef
Introduction: The bispecific antibodies teclistamab (TEC) and talquetamab (TAL) have been recently approved in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety outcomes of patients with RRMM treated with the approved schedule of TEC or TAL at 8 Greek centers until 30/06/2024. Results: 35 patients were included; 24 on TEC (median age 66.5 years, range 44-85, 45.8% females) and 11 on TAL (57 years, 50-60, 18.2% females). 10 (41.7%) and 1 (9.1%) were primary refractory, whereas 13 (54.2%) and 10 (90.9%) were penta-refractory, respectively. The patients had received a median of 5 (range 3-11) and 7 (5-11) prior lines of treatment, respectively. 9 (37.5%) and 6 patients (54.5%) had extramedullary disease (EMD), respectively. After a median of 8 and 7 cycles (range 3-23 and 2-17), respectively, best responses included 7 (33.4%) complete response (CR) or better, 3 (12.5%) very good partial response (VGPR) and 7 (29.2%) partial response (PR) for TEC and 1 (9.1%) CR or better, 2 (18.2%) VGPR, 2 (18.2) PR, 1 (9.1%) minor response (MR) and 3 (27.3%) stable disease (SD) for TAL. The median time to first response was 36 (range 20-120) and 42 (15-67) days and the median time to best response was 56.5 (range 20-211) and 56 (15-194) days, respectively. 3/7 patients with EMD on TEC responded (42.9%) and 2/6 on TAL (33.3%). 14 patients (58.3%) on TEC are still ongoing treatment in remission, 1 (4.2%) is off treatment but in remission, while 5 (20.8%) have discontinued due to progressive disease (PD) (5%) and 4 (23.6%) have died (3 due to PD, 1 due to COVID-19); two (8.3%) were lost to follow-up. For TAL, 5 patients (45.5%) are still undergoing treatment on remission, whereas 6 (54.5%) have died due to PD. At a median follow-up of 4.6 months (range 0.2-13.5) for TEC and 7.8 months (1.1, 19.8) for TAL, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached (NR) and was 6.9 (95% CI: 3.87, NA) months, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was NR for TEC, while it was 11.5 months (95% CI: 7.8, NA) for TAL. There were no significant differences in PFS for each treatment group when stratified by the presence of high-risk cytogenetics, ISS stage, penta-refractory status or extramedullary disease. Every patient was hospitalized at least for the initial administration of the drug. The median days of hospitalization were 9 (range 2-45) and 10 (9-22), respectively. Five patients on TEC (20.8%) and 3 on TAL (27.3%) were required to be re-admitted, mainly due to infections. The median hospitalization days for re-admitted patients were 5 (range 2-10) and 7 (4-9), respectively. Eight patients (33.3%) on TEC and 8 patients (72.7%) on TAL developed grade 1-5 infections (mainly bacterial and viral) with the first being at a median of 3 (range 1-15) and 1 (range 1-5) cycles, respectively. Five of infected patients on TEC and the 6 on TAL required hospitalization with a median of 5 (range 4-10) and 7 (range 5-45) days until resolution. There was no association between baseline neutrophil or leukocyte levels and infection occurrence. Therapy-induced CRS was documented in 15 (62.5%) TEC and 7 (63.6%) TAL patients. There were 5 (20.8%) and 7 (63.6%) incidences of CRS after dose step-up. The median grade for both groups was 1 (range 1-3). The median time to CRS onset for both groups was 1.5 and 1 day (ranges 1-5 and 1-1) and the median time to resolution for both groups was 1 day (ranges 1-5 and 1-2). The main treatment of choice in both cohorts was tocilizumab (40.0% and 42.9%). There was only one case of Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) in the TEC group. Hypogammaglobulinemia was common even at treatment initiation, as it was present in 16 (66.7%) and 3 (27.3%) patients for TEC and TAL groups, respectively. There were also 10 (41.7%) cases during TEC treatment. After a median of 4 months (range 1-8) on Ig administration, 9 patients (90.0%) recovered. Moreover, there were 7 (29.2%) and 5 (45.5%) cases of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and 8 (33.3%) and 5 (45.5%) cases of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia, respectively. Dermatological complications were prevalent mainly in the TAL group, with 3 (12.5%) cases of grade 2 rash and 4 (36.4%) nail changes. There were 3 (12.5%) cases of grade 1-3 rash in the TEC group. Conclusion: Real-world outcomes confirm the efficacy and safety profile of TEC and TAL in RRMM comparable to clinical trials.
Title: Real-World Outcomes of Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treated with Teclistamab and Talquetamab; A Multicenter Analysis from the Greek Myeloma Study Group
Description:
Introduction: The bispecific antibodies teclistamab (TEC) and talquetamab (TAL) have been recently approved in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety outcomes of patients with RRMM treated with the approved schedule of TEC or TAL at 8 Greek centers until 30/06/2024.
Results: 35 patients were included; 24 on TEC (median age 66.
5 years, range 44-85, 45.
8% females) and 11 on TAL (57 years, 50-60, 18.
2% females).
10 (41.
7%) and 1 (9.
1%) were primary refractory, whereas 13 (54.
2%) and 10 (90.
9%) were penta-refractory, respectively.
The patients had received a median of 5 (range 3-11) and 7 (5-11) prior lines of treatment, respectively.
9 (37.
5%) and 6 patients (54.
5%) had extramedullary disease (EMD), respectively.
After a median of 8 and 7 cycles (range 3-23 and 2-17), respectively, best responses included 7 (33.
4%) complete response (CR) or better, 3 (12.
5%) very good partial response (VGPR) and 7 (29.
2%) partial response (PR) for TEC and 1 (9.
1%) CR or better, 2 (18.
2%) VGPR, 2 (18.
2) PR, 1 (9.
1%) minor response (MR) and 3 (27.
3%) stable disease (SD) for TAL.
The median time to first response was 36 (range 20-120) and 42 (15-67) days and the median time to best response was 56.
5 (range 20-211) and 56 (15-194) days, respectively.
3/7 patients with EMD on TEC responded (42.
9%) and 2/6 on TAL (33.
3%).
14 patients (58.
3%) on TEC are still ongoing treatment in remission, 1 (4.
2%) is off treatment but in remission, while 5 (20.
8%) have discontinued due to progressive disease (PD) (5%) and 4 (23.
6%) have died (3 due to PD, 1 due to COVID-19); two (8.
3%) were lost to follow-up.
For TAL, 5 patients (45.
5%) are still undergoing treatment on remission, whereas 6 (54.
5%) have died due to PD.
At a median follow-up of 4.
6 months (range 0.
2-13.
5) for TEC and 7.
8 months (1.
1, 19.
8) for TAL, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached (NR) and was 6.
9 (95% CI: 3.
87, NA) months, respectively.
Median overall survival (OS) was NR for TEC, while it was 11.
5 months (95% CI: 7.
8, NA) for TAL.
There were no significant differences in PFS for each treatment group when stratified by the presence of high-risk cytogenetics, ISS stage, penta-refractory status or extramedullary disease.
Every patient was hospitalized at least for the initial administration of the drug.
The median days of hospitalization were 9 (range 2-45) and 10 (9-22), respectively.
Five patients on TEC (20.
8%) and 3 on TAL (27.
3%) were required to be re-admitted, mainly due to infections.
The median hospitalization days for re-admitted patients were 5 (range 2-10) and 7 (4-9), respectively.
Eight patients (33.
3%) on TEC and 8 patients (72.
7%) on TAL developed grade 1-5 infections (mainly bacterial and viral) with the first being at a median of 3 (range 1-15) and 1 (range 1-5) cycles, respectively.
Five of infected patients on TEC and the 6 on TAL required hospitalization with a median of 5 (range 4-10) and 7 (range 5-45) days until resolution.
There was no association between baseline neutrophil or leukocyte levels and infection occurrence.
Therapy-induced CRS was documented in 15 (62.
5%) TEC and 7 (63.
6%) TAL patients.
There were 5 (20.
8%) and 7 (63.
6%) incidences of CRS after dose step-up.
The median grade for both groups was 1 (range 1-3).
The median time to CRS onset for both groups was 1.
5 and 1 day (ranges 1-5 and 1-1) and the median time to resolution for both groups was 1 day (ranges 1-5 and 1-2).
The main treatment of choice in both cohorts was tocilizumab (40.
0% and 42.
9%).
There was only one case of Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) in the TEC group.
Hypogammaglobulinemia was common even at treatment initiation, as it was present in 16 (66.
7%) and 3 (27.
3%) patients for TEC and TAL groups, respectively.
There were also 10 (41.
7%) cases during TEC treatment.
After a median of 4 months (range 1-8) on Ig administration, 9 patients (90.
0%) recovered.
Moreover, there were 7 (29.
2%) and 5 (45.
5%) cases of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and 8 (33.
3%) and 5 (45.
5%) cases of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia, respectively.
Dermatological complications were prevalent mainly in the TAL group, with 3 (12.
5%) cases of grade 2 rash and 4 (36.
4%) nail changes.
There were 3 (12.
5%) cases of grade 1-3 rash in the TEC group.
Conclusion: Real-world outcomes confirm the efficacy and safety profile of TEC and TAL in RRMM comparable to clinical trials.

Related Results

Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Abstract 1636: TNF-driven paracrine killing determines the cytotoxic efficacy of Teclistamab in Myeloma
Abstract 1636: TNF-driven paracrine killing determines the cytotoxic efficacy of Teclistamab in Myeloma
Abstract Multiple Myeloma is the second most common hematologic malignancy among US adults and remains incurable. Immunotherapies, including bispecific T cell eng...
Teclistamab-cqyv: The First Bispecific T-Cell Engager Antibody for the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Teclistamab-cqyv: The First Bispecific T-Cell Engager Antibody for the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable malignancy originating from plasma cells. Despite significant advances in treatment, relapses remain inevitable, and novel therapies cont...
Management of Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treated With Talquetamab: Highlights From Pharmacists’ Perspectives
Management of Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treated With Talquetamab: Highlights From Pharmacists’ Perspectives
Talquetamab is a first-in-class G protein–coupled receptor family C group 5 member D (GPRC5D) and CD3-targeting bispecific antibody with > 71% overall response in patients with ...
Daratumumab in Ittp: A Case Series
Daratumumab in Ittp: A Case Series
Background: Immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura is an idiopathic autoimmune hematological disorder which clinically presents with a transiently or...

Back to Top