Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Water-Alternating-Gas Injection Simulation - Best Practices

View through CrossRef
Abstract Water-Alternating-Gas injection is one of the most applicable EOR techniques in oil reservoirs worldwide. To optimize the WAG injection projects, numerical simulation is the best available tool to aid with such objective. In this paper, we are looking into the simulation process (from core-scale to reservoir-scale) in more details to understand the challenges and try to suggest best practices and guidelines. The first part of this paper will discuss the role of hysteresis in WAG injection based on the results of several three-phase Water-Alternating-Gas injection experiments. Then the significance of three-phase hysteresis in simulating WAG injection will be highlighted. After establishing a good understanding of the role of three-phase hysteresis in WAG injection simulation, the second part will present sensitivity study at reservoirs-scale to identify the main differences in the simulation results. Finally, towards the end of the paper, WAG injection's best practices guideline will be suggested. Currently, the common practice is to estimate three-phase hysteresis parameters (Land trapping parameter [C], secondary drainage gas relative permeability reduction exponent [alpha], residual oil modification factor [a], and three-phase water relative permeability [krw3ph]) from coreflood experiments. Based on several three-phase WAG injection experiments conducted at Heriot-Watt University, we came up with several conclusions. These conclusions are: If the pressure drop (DP) during the three-phase water injection experiment is significantly higher than the DP during two-phase water injection, then a lower three-phase water relative permeability is essential to match the three-phase WAG injection experimental data.If the pressure drop (DP) at the end of two-phase gas injection is lower than the DP at the end of three-phase gas injection, then alpha [α] is critical to match the three-phase WAG injection experimental data.If the experimental results showed significant gas trapping [Sgt] during water injection after gas injection, then Land's trapping parameter is essential to model such trapping behaviour at any scale.These parameters should be obtained from experiments starting with gas injection (GAW) to fit with the definitions accepted into the numerical simulations. Many studies in the literature either ignores the effect of hysteresis in WAG injection or use invalid WAG hysteresis parameters. In this paper, we highlighted the role of hysteresis in WAG injection and clarified the confusion on the procedures to obtain the correct hysteresis parameters. Also, we provided an easy guideline to help the industry in making accurate predictions for WAG injection projects.
Title: Water-Alternating-Gas Injection Simulation - Best Practices
Description:
Abstract Water-Alternating-Gas injection is one of the most applicable EOR techniques in oil reservoirs worldwide.
To optimize the WAG injection projects, numerical simulation is the best available tool to aid with such objective.
In this paper, we are looking into the simulation process (from core-scale to reservoir-scale) in more details to understand the challenges and try to suggest best practices and guidelines.
The first part of this paper will discuss the role of hysteresis in WAG injection based on the results of several three-phase Water-Alternating-Gas injection experiments.
Then the significance of three-phase hysteresis in simulating WAG injection will be highlighted.
After establishing a good understanding of the role of three-phase hysteresis in WAG injection simulation, the second part will present sensitivity study at reservoirs-scale to identify the main differences in the simulation results.
Finally, towards the end of the paper, WAG injection's best practices guideline will be suggested.
Currently, the common practice is to estimate three-phase hysteresis parameters (Land trapping parameter [C], secondary drainage gas relative permeability reduction exponent [alpha], residual oil modification factor [a], and three-phase water relative permeability [krw3ph]) from coreflood experiments.
Based on several three-phase WAG injection experiments conducted at Heriot-Watt University, we came up with several conclusions.
These conclusions are: If the pressure drop (DP) during the three-phase water injection experiment is significantly higher than the DP during two-phase water injection, then a lower three-phase water relative permeability is essential to match the three-phase WAG injection experimental data.
If the pressure drop (DP) at the end of two-phase gas injection is lower than the DP at the end of three-phase gas injection, then alpha [α] is critical to match the three-phase WAG injection experimental data.
If the experimental results showed significant gas trapping [Sgt] during water injection after gas injection, then Land's trapping parameter is essential to model such trapping behaviour at any scale.
These parameters should be obtained from experiments starting with gas injection (GAW) to fit with the definitions accepted into the numerical simulations.
Many studies in the literature either ignores the effect of hysteresis in WAG injection or use invalid WAG hysteresis parameters.
In this paper, we highlighted the role of hysteresis in WAG injection and clarified the confusion on the procedures to obtain the correct hysteresis parameters.
Also, we provided an easy guideline to help the industry in making accurate predictions for WAG injection projects.

Related Results

Overview of Key Zonal Water Injection Technologies in China
Overview of Key Zonal Water Injection Technologies in China
Abstract Separated layer water injection is the important technology to realize the oilfield long-term high and stable yield. Through continuous researches and te...
COMPARATIVE PRODUCTION PERFORMANCE BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL WATER ALTERNATING GAS FLOODING AND WATER DUMPFLOOD ALTERNATING GAS INJECTION
COMPARATIVE PRODUCTION PERFORMANCE BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL WATER ALTERNATING GAS FLOODING AND WATER DUMPFLOOD ALTERNATING GAS INJECTION
Water dumpflood alternating gas injection (WDAG) to improve oil recovery is proposed in this thesis. Eliminating water flooding system at surface, water flows freely through a dump...
A New IPR Curve Of Gas-Water Well In Gas Reservoirs Undergoing Simultaneous Water Production
A New IPR Curve Of Gas-Water Well In Gas Reservoirs Undergoing Simultaneous Water Production
Abstract Based on principle of mass conservation, this paper sets up a new mathematical model of gas-water two-phase underground percolation, and the model includ...
Gas Water Deliverability Considerations
Gas Water Deliverability Considerations
Abstract When natural gas from high pressure and temperature reservoir is produced, due to cooling of gas in wellbore tubing and in gas gathering pipelines, the a...
Usan Field: Managing Gas Injection at Mechanical Seal Capacity
Usan Field: Managing Gas Injection at Mechanical Seal Capacity
Abstract Usan is a highly-compartmentalized deepwater field offshore Nigeria with both structural and stratigraphic barriers across and within the compartments. The ...
Managing Gas-Constrained Facility: Converting Oil Producer into Gas Injection Well
Managing Gas-Constrained Facility: Converting Oil Producer into Gas Injection Well
Abstract In accordance with Banyu Urip reservoir simulation for production outlook, produced gas is increasing over time causing the facility to become gas-constrain...

Back to Top