Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Byzantine Monasticism

View through CrossRef
Monasticism was practiced widely across the Byzantine Empire and took multiple forms. The major models were: coenobitic, based on communal living; lavriotic, where monks lived separately but came together for religious celebrations; and eremitic, focused on ascetic isolation. Irregular paradigms included wandering monks and stylites who lived atop pillars. Variety, therefore, is a key characteristic of Byzantine monasticism. While both Byzantine and Western monasticism draw from the authority of the desert fathers and share certain general characteristics (such as monastic rules, use of habits to distinguish the monk from the layperson, ascetic practices, and female monasteries having smaller financial endowments than male ones), Byzantine monks were very different from their Western peers. The authority and rule of Basil of Caesarea held considerably more weight within the Byzantine tradition. Byzantine monasteries traditionally did not raise oblates from childhood, instead accepting adult novices only. Monastic orders did not exist in Byzantium, although certain influential monasteries (e.g., Stoudios) did share ideas and practices with other monasteries. The monastic evidence base is less well preserved than in the West, with many monasteries destroyed or disbanded during early Islamic conquests, crusades, the Ottoman conquest, and subsequent rule by non-Orthodox powers. Between this and the variety factor, the field of Byzantine monastic studies has lacked the broad, comprehensive historical overviews so prevalent within Western monastic studies. The general historical arc of Byzantine monasticism falls into three phases. The first, from the fourth to the eighth centuries, usually highlights the development of monasticism across Egypt, Asia Minor, Syria, and Palestine, with heterogeneous heroes and practices. While Western medieval scholarship pulls most heavily on the Egyptian traditions as roots for Western monasticism, Byzantine monasticism owes debts to all those regions. The second phase usually dates from the end of iconoclasm (843) to the fall of Constantinople in 1204 (in short, after recovery from the 7th-century crises and before the crisis of the Fourth Crusade) and emphasizes explosive growth in the number of monasteries and influence of monks. Challenges for monastic values and outside authorities accompanied the monastic expansion, leading to both reform efforts and new monastic traditions. After the restoration of the Byzantine Empire in 1261, many monasteries had to be refounded, and monks struggled with both the question of Church Union with the West and whether to seek direct communion with God via hesychasm. In all time periods, monasticism acts as a microcosm for broader Byzantine society, debates, and values.
Oxford University Press
Title: Byzantine Monasticism
Description:
Monasticism was practiced widely across the Byzantine Empire and took multiple forms.
The major models were: coenobitic, based on communal living; lavriotic, where monks lived separately but came together for religious celebrations; and eremitic, focused on ascetic isolation.
Irregular paradigms included wandering monks and stylites who lived atop pillars.
Variety, therefore, is a key characteristic of Byzantine monasticism.
While both Byzantine and Western monasticism draw from the authority of the desert fathers and share certain general characteristics (such as monastic rules, use of habits to distinguish the monk from the layperson, ascetic practices, and female monasteries having smaller financial endowments than male ones), Byzantine monks were very different from their Western peers.
The authority and rule of Basil of Caesarea held considerably more weight within the Byzantine tradition.
Byzantine monasteries traditionally did not raise oblates from childhood, instead accepting adult novices only.
Monastic orders did not exist in Byzantium, although certain influential monasteries (e.
g.
, Stoudios) did share ideas and practices with other monasteries.
The monastic evidence base is less well preserved than in the West, with many monasteries destroyed or disbanded during early Islamic conquests, crusades, the Ottoman conquest, and subsequent rule by non-Orthodox powers.
Between this and the variety factor, the field of Byzantine monastic studies has lacked the broad, comprehensive historical overviews so prevalent within Western monastic studies.
The general historical arc of Byzantine monasticism falls into three phases.
The first, from the fourth to the eighth centuries, usually highlights the development of monasticism across Egypt, Asia Minor, Syria, and Palestine, with heterogeneous heroes and practices.
While Western medieval scholarship pulls most heavily on the Egyptian traditions as roots for Western monasticism, Byzantine monasticism owes debts to all those regions.
The second phase usually dates from the end of iconoclasm (843) to the fall of Constantinople in 1204 (in short, after recovery from the 7th-century crises and before the crisis of the Fourth Crusade) and emphasizes explosive growth in the number of monasteries and influence of monks.
Challenges for monastic values and outside authorities accompanied the monastic expansion, leading to both reform efforts and new monastic traditions.
After the restoration of the Byzantine Empire in 1261, many monasteries had to be refounded, and monks struggled with both the question of Church Union with the West and whether to seek direct communion with God via hesychasm.
In all time periods, monasticism acts as a microcosm for broader Byzantine society, debates, and values.

Related Results

The Role of the Church and Monasticism in the Growth of Legal Coptic
The Role of the Church and Monasticism in the Growth of Legal Coptic
This chapter studies the role of the Church and monasticism in the growth of legal Coptic. To do so, it presents three documentary dossiers that will clarify the major impetus that...
Monasteries, in the East
Monasteries, in the East
AbstractEremitism (or anchoritism) and cenobitism are the two main monastic lifestyles; both appeared in the fourth centuryCE. Eremitism is most associated with Antony the Great (c...
Christianity and Monasticism in Northern Egypt
Christianity and Monasticism in Northern Egypt
Christianity and monasticism have long flourished in the northern part of Upper Egypt and in the Nile Delta, from Beni Suef to the Mediterranean coast. The chapters in this volume,...
Female Monasticism, Ecclesiastical Reform, and Regional Politics: The Northern Archdiocese of Reims, circa 1060-1120
Female Monasticism, Ecclesiastical Reform, and Regional Politics: The Northern Archdiocese of Reims, circa 1060-1120
The evidence analyzed in this article shows that the common understanding of the development of female monasticism in the period between ca. 1060 and ca. 1120 is too reliant on the...
Merovingian Monasticism
Merovingian Monasticism
This chapter critically discusses the emergence of Western monasticism by identifying a number of silent turning points and instances of conflict that do not as yet play much of a ...
Female Monasticism to 1100
Female Monasticism to 1100
By 500 ce, Christian women monastics lived in almost all the corners of the former western Empire and beyond, in places like Frisia and Ireland. These religious communities were no...
Byzantine music in the educational and scientific space of modern Ukraine
Byzantine music in the educational and scientific space of modern Ukraine
Relevance of the research. The persistent revival of early music in the twentieth century led to a number of large and small discoveries that significantly enriched the history of ...
Women in the Byzantine Empire
Women in the Byzantine Empire
In premodern societies, such as Byzantium where the dominant ideology was male-centered, there was much discussion in various texts—moralist, legal, philosophical, religious, medic...

Back to Top