Survival Outcomes in Split Compared With Whole Liver Transplantation

Split‐liver transplantation (SLT) should be cautiously considered because the right trisection (RTS) graft can be a marginal graft in adult recipients. Herein, we analyzed the outcomes of RTS‐SLT in Korea, where >75% of adult liver transplantations are performed with living donor liver transplantation. Among 2462 patients who underwent deceased donor liver transplantations (DDLTs) from 2005 to 2014, we retrospectively reviewed 86 (3.5%) adult patients who received a RTS graft (RTS‐SLT group). The outcomes of the RTS‐SLT group were compared with those of 303 recipients of whole liver (WL; WL‐DDLT group). Recipient age, laboratory Model for End‐Stage‐Liver Disease (L‐MELD) score, ischemia time, and donor‐to‐recipient weight ratio (DRWR) were not different between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). However, malignancy was uncommon (4.7% versus 36.3%), and the donor was younger (25.2 versus 42.7 years) in the RST‐SLT group than in the WL‐DDLT group (P < 0.05). The technical complication rates and the 5‐year graft survival rates (89.0% versus 92.8%) were not different between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The 5‐year overall survival (OS) rate (63.1%) and graft‐failure‐free survival rate (63.1%) of the RTS‐SLT group were worse than that of the WL‐DDLT group (79.3% and 79.3%; P < 0.05). The factors affecting graft survival rates were not definite. However, the factors affecting OS in the RTS‐SLT group were L‐MELD score >30 and DRWR ≤1.0. In the subgroup analysis, OS was not different between the 2 groups if the DRWR was >1.0, regardless of the L‐MELD score (P > 0.05). In conclusion, a sufficient volume of the graft estimated from DRWR‐matching could lead to better outcomes of adult SLTs with a RTS graft, even in patients with high L‐MELD scores.