Javascript must be enabled to continue!
On complementizers and relative pronouns in Germanic vs. Romance
View through CrossRef
Many Germanic languages have a finite-clause complementizer that resembles a demonstrative, e.g. English that, Dutch dat, German dass. No Romance language does. The traditional view of complementizers as simplex projecting heads that take IP or some comparable category as a complement has no way of accounting for this difference between Germanic and Romance. In this chapter, I will attempt to make progress toward an account, in part by reinterpreting finite-clause complementizers as relative pronouns.
Title: On complementizers and relative pronouns in Germanic vs. Romance
Description:
Many Germanic languages have a finite-clause complementizer that resembles a demonstrative, e.
g.
English that, Dutch dat, German dass.
No Romance language does.
The traditional view of complementizers as simplex projecting heads that take IP or some comparable category as a complement has no way of accounting for this difference between Germanic and Romance.
In this chapter, I will attempt to make progress toward an account, in part by reinterpreting finite-clause complementizers as relative pronouns.
Related Results
The position of subjects in Germanic and Romance questions
The position of subjects in Germanic and Romance questions
This chapter discusses a difference between Germanic and Romance languages in the syntax of subjects: While in Germanic wh-questions, full subjects can occur in the canonical, prev...
PRONOMINA BAHASA KOMERING
PRONOMINA BAHASA KOMERING
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan bentuk pronomina persona, pronomina penunjuk, dan pronomina penanya dalam bahasa Komering. Penelitian dilaksanakan dengan menggunaka...
PRONOMS PERSONNELS COMPLÉMENTS DISJOINTS ET PRONOMS ADVERBIAUX EN ET Y : FONCTIONNEMENT SÉMANTIQUE ET MODE DE DONATION DU RÉFÉRENT
PRONOMS PERSONNELS COMPLÉMENTS DISJOINTS ET PRONOMS ADVERBIAUX EN ET Y : FONCTIONNEMENT SÉMANTIQUE ET MODE DE DONATION DU RÉFÉRENT
RÉSUMÉ. Notre objectif consistera à étudier, d’un point de vue contrastif, le fonctionnement référentiel des pronoms adverbiaux en et y et des pronoms personnels compléments disjoi...
Genealogical implications and Germanic phylogeny
Genealogical implications and Germanic phylogeny
AbstractThis chapter focuses on the findings of both preceding modelling parts as well as previous literature on Germanic. This part aims to detail the history of the dissolution o...
Adjectival concord in Romance and Germanic
Adjectival concord in Romance and Germanic
This chapter provides a unified analysis of adnominal and predicate adjectives in Romance and Germanic by distinguishing three types of feature sharing: agreement, concord and proj...
Ditransitive Constructions in Zaza Language
Ditransitive Constructions in Zaza Language
Languages group verbs in different ways. Because of the ergative feature of Zazaki, it plays a big role whether the verbs are transitive or intransitive. Zaza Language introduces s...
Further Sources of Indefinite Pronouns
Further Sources of Indefinite Pronouns
Abstract
This chapter focuses on diachronic sources of indefinite pronouns that cannot be easily subsumed under grammaticalization. It first considers indefinite pro...

