Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Adjectival concord in Romance and Germanic
View through CrossRef
This chapter provides a unified analysis of adnominal and predicate adjectives in Romance and Germanic by distinguishing three types of feature sharing: agreement, concord and projection, along the lines of Giusti (2015). It claims that in both Romance and Germanic, an uninterpretable feature of N agrees with possessive adjectives, while adnominal adjectives concord with N in a Spec-Head configuration checking an uninterpretable feature bundle on A. Romance and Germanic only differ in how concord is spelled out. Romance adjectives (with the exception of Walloon) are inflected for nominal features and concord with null head. German adjectives are uninflected and concord with an overt N-segment. The proposal argues against a unification of concord and agreement and in favour of an autonomous category, adjective, crosslinguistically.
Title: Adjectival concord in Romance and Germanic
Description:
This chapter provides a unified analysis of adnominal and predicate adjectives in Romance and Germanic by distinguishing three types of feature sharing: agreement, concord and projection, along the lines of Giusti (2015).
It claims that in both Romance and Germanic, an uninterpretable feature of N agrees with possessive adjectives, while adnominal adjectives concord with N in a Spec-Head configuration checking an uninterpretable feature bundle on A.
Romance and Germanic only differ in how concord is spelled out.
Romance adjectives (with the exception of Walloon) are inflected for nominal features and concord with null head.
German adjectives are uninflected and concord with an overt N-segment.
The proposal argues against a unification of concord and agreement and in favour of an autonomous category, adjective, crosslinguistically.
Related Results
The position of subjects in Germanic and Romance questions
The position of subjects in Germanic and Romance questions
This chapter discusses a difference between Germanic and Romance languages in the syntax of subjects: While in Germanic wh-questions, full subjects can occur in the canonical, prev...
Adjectives in Arabic
Adjectives in Arabic
The main aim of this paper is to describe the main adjectival constructions in Modern Standard Arabic (MSA). It contributes a new analysis of an adjectival construction in MSA that...
Genealogical implications and Germanic phylogeny
Genealogical implications and Germanic phylogeny
AbstractThis chapter focuses on the findings of both preceding modelling parts as well as previous literature on Germanic. This part aims to detail the history of the dissolution o...
How adjectival can a participle be?
How adjectival can a participle be?
«This book takes theoretical linguistics by storm, moving our understanding of the passive construction onto a whole new level. Samirah Aljohani puts the adjectival passive under t...
On complementizers and relative pronouns in Germanic vs. Romance
On complementizers and relative pronouns in Germanic vs. Romance
Many Germanic languages have a finite-clause complementizer that resembles a demonstrative, e.g. English that, Dutch dat, German dass. No Romance language does. The traditional vie...
Concord Errors in Postgraduate Theses in Ghana: A Descriptive Analysis
Concord Errors in Postgraduate Theses in Ghana: A Descriptive Analysis
The average postgraduate student in Ghana has about 20 years exposure in English language, having been taught and instructed in English from primary to tertiary level. It is, there...
Efterkrigsritualet – En komparativ analyse af de danske krigsbytteofringer
Efterkrigsritualet – En komparativ analyse af de danske krigsbytteofringer
The post-war ritual – a comparative analysis of the Danish war booty offerings and the Roman triumphsThis article is inspired by a theory, which postulates that the Roman triumphs ...

