Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Democratization of property relations
View through CrossRef
The process of democratization of property relations has affected, first of all, the European area, and then the other parts of the world. Having been established with a clear economic and social content, without the ideological burden, the employees shareholding and participation have the conditions to expand, strengthen their power and become one of the important factors in the structure of the modern society. In our area, the process of the transformation of social ownership began with the employees shareholding. Company employees were given the right to buy internal shares under privileged conditions. That was the main form of transformation. There was trust in the company to initiate, organize and manage the process of transformation in its own interest. The funds obtained through the issuance of shares, selling a part of the company or the whole company, according to the express provisions of the law, belong to the company or its complex form. Later, already during 90s, ideological properties were unjustifiably attributed to the employees shareholding and participation, which led to their complete exclusion from the economic and legal system. By subsequent regulations, privatization was almost exclusively reduced to selling, thus excluding all other possible different forms of privatization. This approach lost the sight of the basic economic objectives of privatization: there was no acquiring of new capital or new investment cycle; there were neither new business entities capable of receiving and fertilizing the capital emerged, nor the privatization represented an incentive for dynamic development of economy and employment. Economic enterprises were extinguished, and unemployment increased. And now, in a much less favorable economic and social climate, it is reasonable to raise the issue of whether there are still conditions to engage the inner forces that would take upon themselves the responsibility for getting out of the crisis, by introducing the employees shareholding and privatization. A prerequisite for this is certainly the creation of a legal framework for the establishment and development of the employees shareholding and participation. This would simultaneously bring us closer to the legal system of the European Union and its member states, in which the employees shareholding and participation are widely established and legally regulated institutions.
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Title: Democratization of property relations
Description:
The process of democratization of property relations has affected, first of all, the European area, and then the other parts of the world.
Having been established with a clear economic and social content, without the ideological burden, the employees shareholding and participation have the conditions to expand, strengthen their power and become one of the important factors in the structure of the modern society.
In our area, the process of the transformation of social ownership began with the employees shareholding.
Company employees were given the right to buy internal shares under privileged conditions.
That was the main form of transformation.
There was trust in the company to initiate, organize and manage the process of transformation in its own interest.
The funds obtained through the issuance of shares, selling a part of the company or the whole company, according to the express provisions of the law, belong to the company or its complex form.
Later, already during 90s, ideological properties were unjustifiably attributed to the employees shareholding and participation, which led to their complete exclusion from the economic and legal system.
By subsequent regulations, privatization was almost exclusively reduced to selling, thus excluding all other possible different forms of privatization.
This approach lost the sight of the basic economic objectives of privatization: there was no acquiring of new capital or new investment cycle; there were neither new business entities capable of receiving and fertilizing the capital emerged, nor the privatization represented an incentive for dynamic development of economy and employment.
Economic enterprises were extinguished, and unemployment increased.
And now, in a much less favorable economic and social climate, it is reasonable to raise the issue of whether there are still conditions to engage the inner forces that would take upon themselves the responsibility for getting out of the crisis, by introducing the employees shareholding and privatization.
A prerequisite for this is certainly the creation of a legal framework for the establishment and development of the employees shareholding and participation.
This would simultaneously bring us closer to the legal system of the European Union and its member states, in which the employees shareholding and participation are widely established and legally regulated institutions.
Related Results
Effect of property management on property price: a case study in HK
Effect of property management on property price: a case study in HK
PurposeIt has been said that people's expectation towards their living space has been increased. They have a higher requirement not only for the facilities it provides, but also fo...
Property rights in martial law
Property rights in martial law
The article is devoted to the study of property rights in martial law, the definition of «forced alienation of property» and «seizure of property», reveals their characteristics.
...
Democratization in the Muslim World
Democratization in the Muslim World
The issue of the democratization of the Muslim world has puzzled scholarship since the end of the Cold War, when the third wave of democratization swept across the world but seemed...
Democratization and its Impact on Foreign Relations in Turkey
Democratization and its Impact on Foreign Relations in Turkey
Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze the democratization and its impact on foreign relations in Turkey.
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study re...
Implications Of Legal Protection Of Intellectual Property Rights For Obtaining Economic Benefits
Implications Of Legal Protection Of Intellectual Property Rights For Obtaining Economic Benefits
Intellectual property rights are an implication of the development of international trade, especially in industrial countries. In developing countries, the understanding and protec...
20. Post-Communist Europe and Post-Soviet Russia
20. Post-Communist Europe and Post-Soviet Russia
This chapter examines the democratic revolutions that occurred in post-communist Europe and post-Soviet Eurasia during the period 1989–2008. It first considers the beginning of the...
Relationship Between Strong Monotonicity Property, P2-Property, and the Gus-Property in Semidefinite Linear Complementarity Problems
Relationship Between Strong Monotonicity Property, P2-Property, and the Gus-Property in Semidefinite Linear Complementarity Problems
In a recent paper on semidefinite linear complementarity problems, Gowda and Song (2000) introduced and studied the P-property, P2-property, GUS-property, and strong monotonicity p...
Factors Influencing Customer Choice Decision of Property Management Company in Bangkok Thailand
Factors Influencing Customer Choice Decision of Property Management Company in Bangkok Thailand
Property Management, when done efficiently, is a solution to cutting costs and expenses associated with buildings and increasing the value of assets. Property Management is the man...

