Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Gynecologic Outcomes After Hysteroscopic and Laparoscopic Sterilization Procedures

View through CrossRef
OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of gynecologic morbidity after laparoscopic and hysteroscopic sterilization. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used a commercial claims administrative database, 2007–2013, to compare rates of pregnancy, menstrual dysfunction, pelvic pain, hysteroscopic surgery, and intra-abdominal gynecologic surgery after laparoscopic and hysteroscopic sterilization. Women with 12 or more continuous months of data before and after their index procedure were included. Pregnancy rates after laparoscopic and hysteroscopic sterilization were compared for the entire population of women who underwent hysteroscopic sterilization and the subset who had completed postprocedure hysterosalpingograms. Cox proportional hazard models were calculated controlling for age, comorbidities, U.S. geographic region, metropolitan statistical area designation, and insurance type. RESULTS: A total of 42,391 women underwent laparoscopic and 27,724 underwent hysteroscopic sterilization. The pregnancy rate was higher after hysteroscopic than laparoscopic sterilization (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09–1.33; 2.4% compared with 2.0% risk of pregnancy at 2 years). Only 66.1% (n=18,318) of women who underwent hysteroscopic sterilization received a hysterosalpingogram. This group had similar pregnancy rates as those who underwent laparoscopic sterilization (adjusted HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.80–1.02; 1.8% compared with 2.0% at 2 years). After undergoing hysteroscopic sterilization, more women were diagnosed with menstrual dysfunction (adjusted HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.20–1.27; 26.8% compared with 22.3% at 2 years), and more women underwent hysteroscopic surgeries (adjusted HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.96–2.14; 13.8% compared with 6.4% at 2 years), but fewer women were diagnosed with pelvic pain (adjusted HR 0.83, P<.001; 21.0% compared with 25.6% at 2 years) and fewer women underwent intra-abdominal gynecologic surgeries (adjusted HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90–0.99; 7.7% compared with 8.1% at 2 years), including hysterectomy (adjusted HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.61–0.69; 10.9% compared with 14.3% at 5 years). CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopic sterilization may be associated with a higher rate of pregnancy, more menstrual dysfunction, more hysteroscopic surgeries, less pelvic pain, and fewer intra-abdominal gynecologic surgeries than laparoscopic sterilization. Pregnancy rates appear to be similar for women who completed their postprocedure hysterosalpingogram, but only 66% of women did so.
Title: Gynecologic Outcomes After Hysteroscopic and Laparoscopic Sterilization Procedures
Description:
OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of gynecologic morbidity after laparoscopic and hysteroscopic sterilization.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used a commercial claims administrative database, 2007–2013, to compare rates of pregnancy, menstrual dysfunction, pelvic pain, hysteroscopic surgery, and intra-abdominal gynecologic surgery after laparoscopic and hysteroscopic sterilization.
Women with 12 or more continuous months of data before and after their index procedure were included.
Pregnancy rates after laparoscopic and hysteroscopic sterilization were compared for the entire population of women who underwent hysteroscopic sterilization and the subset who had completed postprocedure hysterosalpingograms.
Cox proportional hazard models were calculated controlling for age, comorbidities, U.
S.
geographic region, metropolitan statistical area designation, and insurance type.
RESULTS: A total of 42,391 women underwent laparoscopic and 27,724 underwent hysteroscopic sterilization.
The pregnancy rate was higher after hysteroscopic than laparoscopic sterilization (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.
20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.
09–1.
33; 2.
4% compared with 2.
0% risk of pregnancy at 2 years).
Only 66.
1% (n=18,318) of women who underwent hysteroscopic sterilization received a hysterosalpingogram.
This group had similar pregnancy rates as those who underwent laparoscopic sterilization (adjusted HR 0.
90, 95% CI 0.
80–1.
02; 1.
8% compared with 2.
0% at 2 years).
After undergoing hysteroscopic sterilization, more women were diagnosed with menstrual dysfunction (adjusted HR 1.
23, 95% CI 1.
20–1.
27; 26.
8% compared with 22.
3% at 2 years), and more women underwent hysteroscopic surgeries (adjusted HR 2.
05, 95% CI 1.
96–2.
14; 13.
8% compared with 6.
4% at 2 years), but fewer women were diagnosed with pelvic pain (adjusted HR 0.
83, P<.
001; 21.
0% compared with 25.
6% at 2 years) and fewer women underwent intra-abdominal gynecologic surgeries (adjusted HR 0.
95, 95% CI 0.
90–0.
99; 7.
7% compared with 8.
1% at 2 years), including hysterectomy (adjusted HR 0.
65, 95% CI 0.
61–0.
69; 10.
9% compared with 14.
3% at 5 years).
CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopic sterilization may be associated with a higher rate of pregnancy, more menstrual dysfunction, more hysteroscopic surgeries, less pelvic pain, and fewer intra-abdominal gynecologic surgeries than laparoscopic sterilization.
Pregnancy rates appear to be similar for women who completed their postprocedure hysterosalpingogram, but only 66% of women did so.

Related Results

Obstetric Outcomes After Failed Hysteroscopic and Laparoscopic Sterilization Procedures
Obstetric Outcomes After Failed Hysteroscopic and Laparoscopic Sterilization Procedures
OBJECTIVE: To compare obstetric outcomes after failed hysteroscopic and laparoscopic sterilization. METHODS: This retrospe...
Forced Sterilization
Forced Sterilization
Photo by Renè Müller on Unsplash INTRODUCTION Forced sterilization of women around the globe is a human rights violation and bioethical concern. In the past, countries enacted laws...
Suture-Induced Tubo-Ovarian Abscess: A Case Report with Literature Review
Suture-Induced Tubo-Ovarian Abscess: A Case Report with Literature Review
Abstract Introduction Suture is an underreported cause for tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA) that can cause significant morbidity. This report describes a case of TOA arising from a silk ...
STERILIZATION: A PREREQUISITE IN MEDICAL DIAGNOSTICS
STERILIZATION: A PREREQUISITE IN MEDICAL DIAGNOSTICS
Sterilization is a critical process with wide-ranging applications in healthcare, pharmaceuticals, food production, and laboratory research. Its primary objective is the complete e...
PREVALENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS IN GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY
PREVALENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS IN GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY
The prevalence of surgical complications in gynecological surgery varies depending on the population. The time of occurrence of complications may range from the time of surgery its...
Biocompatibility of gelatins A and B after sterilization by different methods
Biocompatibility of gelatins A and B after sterilization by different methods
Introduction: The reliable sterilization of gelatin-based hydrogels is of critical importance for the clinical application of a multitude of biomanufactured functional constructs f...
Association between weight-adjusted-waist index and gynecologic cancers: a population-based study
Association between weight-adjusted-waist index and gynecologic cancers: a population-based study
ObjectiveThis study aims to analyze the association between the weight-adjusted waist index (WWI) and the risk of gynecologic cancers, using data collected from the National Health...

Back to Top