Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Liquefied Natural Gas Tender Crashworthiness in Train-to-Train Collisions

View through CrossRef
Research to facilitate industry efforts to safely use natural gas as a locomotive fuel is being directed by the Federal Railroad Administration’s (FRA’s) Office of Research, Development, and Technology. This research is being conducted cooperatively with the Association of American Railroads (AAR). The research results are being shared with the AAR’s Natural Gas Fuel Tender Technical Advisory Group (NGFT TAG), which includes AAR, Member Railroads, and FRA, with support from ARA and Volpe Center. The NGFT TAG is developing industry requirements, including crashworthiness requirements, for revenue-service natural gas fuel tenders. Five accident scenarios have been drafted by the NGFT TAG: a train-to-train collision, a grade-crossing collision, rollover, shell impact, and head impact. Each scenario includes a description of the equipment, the impact conditions, and the prescribed outcome. Conceptually, these tender scenarios parallel the scenarios described in 49 CFR Part 229 Appendix E for locomotive crashworthiness. The focus of the NGFT TAG discussions has expanded to include alternative static requirements. Conceptually, the tender static requirements parallel the requirements for locomotive crashworthiness in AAR S-580. Requirements in S-580 for locomotive structure include static load capacities, material properties, and material thicknesses. For conventionally-designed locomotives, meeting the static requirements of S-580 is accepted as meeting the dynamic requirements of Appendix E. The tender static requirements under development are intended to provide the same level of crashworthiness as the previously proposed dynamic requirements. The primary advantage of static crashworthiness requirements is that compliance can be shown with classical closed-form engineering analyses. A disadvantage is that design features are presumed, such as the inclusion and location of collision posts in a conventional locomotive design. Design features are not presumed in dynamic crashworthiness requirements; however, compliance must be shown with a design-specific validated computer simulation model. So while dynamic requirements allow for a wide range of design approaches, showing compliance often requires extensive effort. This paper focuses on technical information to help support development of alternative static requirements for the train-to-train collision scenario. The goal of the static requirements is to provide the same level of crashworthiness as the dynamic requirements under discussion by the NGFT TAG. Tender features capable of providing the desired level of performance are proposed. These features have been selected such that a tender with these features would be crashworthy-compatible with a wide range of new and existing locomotive structural designs.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Title: Liquefied Natural Gas Tender Crashworthiness in Train-to-Train Collisions
Description:
Research to facilitate industry efforts to safely use natural gas as a locomotive fuel is being directed by the Federal Railroad Administration’s (FRA’s) Office of Research, Development, and Technology.
This research is being conducted cooperatively with the Association of American Railroads (AAR).
The research results are being shared with the AAR’s Natural Gas Fuel Tender Technical Advisory Group (NGFT TAG), which includes AAR, Member Railroads, and FRA, with support from ARA and Volpe Center.
The NGFT TAG is developing industry requirements, including crashworthiness requirements, for revenue-service natural gas fuel tenders.
Five accident scenarios have been drafted by the NGFT TAG: a train-to-train collision, a grade-crossing collision, rollover, shell impact, and head impact.
Each scenario includes a description of the equipment, the impact conditions, and the prescribed outcome.
Conceptually, these tender scenarios parallel the scenarios described in 49 CFR Part 229 Appendix E for locomotive crashworthiness.
The focus of the NGFT TAG discussions has expanded to include alternative static requirements.
Conceptually, the tender static requirements parallel the requirements for locomotive crashworthiness in AAR S-580.
Requirements in S-580 for locomotive structure include static load capacities, material properties, and material thicknesses.
For conventionally-designed locomotives, meeting the static requirements of S-580 is accepted as meeting the dynamic requirements of Appendix E.
The tender static requirements under development are intended to provide the same level of crashworthiness as the previously proposed dynamic requirements.
The primary advantage of static crashworthiness requirements is that compliance can be shown with classical closed-form engineering analyses.
A disadvantage is that design features are presumed, such as the inclusion and location of collision posts in a conventional locomotive design.
Design features are not presumed in dynamic crashworthiness requirements; however, compliance must be shown with a design-specific validated computer simulation model.
So while dynamic requirements allow for a wide range of design approaches, showing compliance often requires extensive effort.
This paper focuses on technical information to help support development of alternative static requirements for the train-to-train collision scenario.
The goal of the static requirements is to provide the same level of crashworthiness as the dynamic requirements under discussion by the NGFT TAG.
Tender features capable of providing the desired level of performance are proposed.
These features have been selected such that a tender with these features would be crashworthy-compatible with a wide range of new and existing locomotive structural designs.

Related Results

Comparisons of Pore Structure for Unconventional Tight Gas, Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas Reservoirs
Comparisons of Pore Structure for Unconventional Tight Gas, Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas Reservoirs
Extended abstract Tight sands gas, coalbed methane and shale gas are three kinds of typical unconventional natural gas. With the decrease of conventional oil and gas...
Gas Water Deliverability Considerations
Gas Water Deliverability Considerations
Abstract When natural gas from high pressure and temperature reservoir is produced, due to cooling of gas in wellbore tubing and in gas gathering pipelines, the a...
Critical Gas Saturation During Depressurisation and its Importance in the Brent Field
Critical Gas Saturation During Depressurisation and its Importance in the Brent Field
Critical Gas Saturation During Depressurisation and its Importance in the Brent Field. Abstract After some 20 years of pressure ...
Unconventional Reservoirs: Basic Petrophysical Concepts for Shale Gas
Unconventional Reservoirs: Basic Petrophysical Concepts for Shale Gas
Abstract Unconventional reservoirs have burst with considerable force in oil and gas production worldwide. Shale Gas is one of them, with intense activity taking pla...
Understanding Unconventional Gas Reservoir Damages
Understanding Unconventional Gas Reservoir Damages
Abstract It is estimated that there are large reserves of unconventional gas located throughout the world, including coalbed methane, shale gas and tight gas sand...
Survey Of Natural Gas Progress
Survey Of Natural Gas Progress
EARLY USE OF NATURAL GAS The earliest occurrence of natural gas is not clearly known, but it is believed that it was observed in the earliest of times. Some accou...
Crashworthiness of Type C Tanks in LPG Ship
Crashworthiness of Type C Tanks in LPG Ship
Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) ships carry a liquefied gas either pressurized, refrigerated or both at the same time. Due to that, among the other cargo containment solutions on LPG...
British Food Journal Volume 21 Issue 4 1919
British Food Journal Volume 21 Issue 4 1919
Food and Drug cases are notorious for their capacity for providing Courts of Justice with knotty points. An interesting specimen of such a point is disclosed in Query No. 8341 in t...

Back to Top