Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Innovative Roadways: An Exploration of Technological Neophilia, Technophobia, and Media Richness in the Shaping of AI-VR Adoption

View through CrossRef
This study explores the adoption of AI-VR systems in car sales by extending the UTAUT framework by incorporating technophobia, technological neophilia, perceived benefits, and media richness. Conducted with 401 passenger car sales executives in Kolkata, West Bengal, the analysis employs partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to elucidate complex relationships among variables and their impact on adoption. The results indicate that performance expectancy positively correlates with behavioral intention, whereas effort expectancy lacks significant influence. Social influence minimally affects behavioral intention, contrasting with a positive relationship with perceived benefits. Technological neophilia positively influences behavioral intention, whereas technophobia has a negative impact. Technological neophilia correlates positively with performance expectancy, effort expectancy, media richness, and technophobia. Social influence is positively related to technological neophilia. These findings contribute valuable insights for targeted interventions and significantly enhance our understanding of AI-VR
Title: Innovative Roadways: An Exploration of Technological Neophilia, Technophobia, and Media Richness in the Shaping of AI-VR Adoption
Description:
This study explores the adoption of AI-VR systems in car sales by extending the UTAUT framework by incorporating technophobia, technological neophilia, perceived benefits, and media richness.
Conducted with 401 passenger car sales executives in Kolkata, West Bengal, the analysis employs partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to elucidate complex relationships among variables and their impact on adoption.
The results indicate that performance expectancy positively correlates with behavioral intention, whereas effort expectancy lacks significant influence.
Social influence minimally affects behavioral intention, contrasting with a positive relationship with perceived benefits.
Technological neophilia positively influences behavioral intention, whereas technophobia has a negative impact.
Technological neophilia correlates positively with performance expectancy, effort expectancy, media richness, and technophobia.
Social influence is positively related to technological neophilia.
These findings contribute valuable insights for targeted interventions and significantly enhance our understanding of AI-VR.

Related Results

Understanding Age Differences in Technophobia: A South African Case Study
Understanding Age Differences in Technophobia: A South African Case Study
Over the years, technology has become an essential part of our lives, with technological advancement presenting on-going opportunities. However, technology creates negative emotion...
Biodiversity indicators in semi-arid, agricultural Western Australia
Biodiversity indicators in semi-arid, agricultural Western Australia
The predicted future loss of native Australian species of plants and animals, in part as a result of adverse land management strategies, has led to attempts to identify areas of hi...
Simulation of Pedestrian Crossing Behaviors at Unmarked Roadways Based on Social Force Model
Simulation of Pedestrian Crossing Behaviors at Unmarked Roadways Based on Social Force Model
Limited pedestrian microcosmic simulation models focus on the interactions between pedestrians and vehicles at unmarked roadways. Pedestrians tend to head to the destinations direc...
The Hybrid Breeding of Nanomedia
The Hybrid Breeding of Nanomedia
IntroductionIf human beings have become a geophysical force, capable of impacting the very crust and atmosphere of the planet, and if geophysical forces become objects of study, pr...
Would conserving natural land cover in landscapes conserve biodiversity?
Would conserving natural land cover in landscapes conserve biodiversity?
ABSTRACTIt is generally accepted that protecting natural land cover would protect biodiversity. This would only be true as a general statement if the relationship between richness ...

Back to Top