Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Environmental Impact From Removal of Installations: The North East Frigg Field Installations

View through CrossRef
1.0 Abstract The removal of the Field Control Station (FCS) from the North East Frigg Field was successfully performed in 1996. The preparation started in 1990 and have been a long process. The final Abandonment and removal Plan was approved by the Norwegian Parliament in 1995. This paper presents the decision process by the Authorities of the Operator's Abandonment/removal plan, the approach and the results of the Operator's work to meet the environmental, safety and cost associated targets in accordance with the Authority's abandonment/removal plan, the prevailing legislation and the International legal framework. The additional studies, engineering and risk analysis undertaken allowed the Operator to choose and the Authorities to decide on a combination of different type disposal of parts of the installations. The approved disposal scenarios represents a very satisfying solution for the environment both at sea and in air. Although the NEF field consists of very specific installations, this first case in Norwegian continental shelf attracted considerable interest in term of decision process, contractual and safety-environmental aspects. This was the first case for the Norwegian Authorities to handle and it can be used as an example for the decision process when removal of other platforms is being prepared in the future especially in terms of Environmental Impact assessment, operation safety, Waste Management Program, Third Party Inventory etc. However this does not preclude the need to study each installation case by case. Introduction The North East Frigg (NEF) gas field was a small satellite of the Frigg field (see Fig 1), operated by ELF Petroleum Norge as. When the NEF Subsea Production System (SPS) came on stream 8 December 1983 it was the first multiwell SPS to deliver commercial gas. The field was shut in 8 May 1993 after having produced more than 11 BSCM of gas and was thereafter the first field to be decommissioned in the Norwegian Sector of the North Sea. The abandonment of the wells was performed Summer 1994, the Field Control Station was removed Summer 1996 and the Subsea Template will be removed in Summer 1997. This paper, which is a follow up of the SPE 27 148 paper presented at the conference in Djarkarta January 1994, describes briefly the decision process involved in obtaining the Authority's approval of the Abandonment and Removal Plan, the Operator's measures to meet the requirements set by the Authorities and the final disposal of the installations. 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTALLATIONS Figure 1 shows a perspective view of the installations in place on the field for which removal or abandonment have been assessed. They are: A subsea Template with 6 wells. An unmanned Field Control Station (FCS) comprising concrete base, a steel column and a head accommodating an helideck, living quarters area and control equipment. Six umbilicals (hydraulic control lines, injection and service lines) connecting the FCS to the template for direct control of the Xmas trees. Electrical control and power cable from Frigg Field to FCS 16 inch gas pipeline for the transportation of the produced gas to Frigg field. 2" inch methanol pipeline for the transportation of methanol from Frigg field to North East Frigg FCS. An overview of the weights of the different installations as well as a their material content is given in table 1. P. 177^
Title: Environmental Impact From Removal of Installations: The North East Frigg Field Installations
Description:
1.
0 Abstract The removal of the Field Control Station (FCS) from the North East Frigg Field was successfully performed in 1996.
The preparation started in 1990 and have been a long process.
The final Abandonment and removal Plan was approved by the Norwegian Parliament in 1995.
This paper presents the decision process by the Authorities of the Operator's Abandonment/removal plan, the approach and the results of the Operator's work to meet the environmental, safety and cost associated targets in accordance with the Authority's abandonment/removal plan, the prevailing legislation and the International legal framework.
The additional studies, engineering and risk analysis undertaken allowed the Operator to choose and the Authorities to decide on a combination of different type disposal of parts of the installations.
The approved disposal scenarios represents a very satisfying solution for the environment both at sea and in air.
Although the NEF field consists of very specific installations, this first case in Norwegian continental shelf attracted considerable interest in term of decision process, contractual and safety-environmental aspects.
This was the first case for the Norwegian Authorities to handle and it can be used as an example for the decision process when removal of other platforms is being prepared in the future especially in terms of Environmental Impact assessment, operation safety, Waste Management Program, Third Party Inventory etc.
However this does not preclude the need to study each installation case by case.
Introduction The North East Frigg (NEF) gas field was a small satellite of the Frigg field (see Fig 1), operated by ELF Petroleum Norge as.
When the NEF Subsea Production System (SPS) came on stream 8 December 1983 it was the first multiwell SPS to deliver commercial gas.
The field was shut in 8 May 1993 after having produced more than 11 BSCM of gas and was thereafter the first field to be decommissioned in the Norwegian Sector of the North Sea.
The abandonment of the wells was performed Summer 1994, the Field Control Station was removed Summer 1996 and the Subsea Template will be removed in Summer 1997.
This paper, which is a follow up of the SPE 27 148 paper presented at the conference in Djarkarta January 1994, describes briefly the decision process involved in obtaining the Authority's approval of the Abandonment and Removal Plan, the Operator's measures to meet the requirements set by the Authorities and the final disposal of the installations.
3.
0 DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTALLATIONS Figure 1 shows a perspective view of the installations in place on the field for which removal or abandonment have been assessed.
They are: A subsea Template with 6 wells.
An unmanned Field Control Station (FCS) comprising concrete base, a steel column and a head accommodating an helideck, living quarters area and control equipment.
Six umbilicals (hydraulic control lines, injection and service lines) connecting the FCS to the template for direct control of the Xmas trees.
Electrical control and power cable from Frigg Field to FCS 16 inch gas pipeline for the transportation of the produced gas to Frigg field.
2" inch methanol pipeline for the transportation of methanol from Frigg field to North East Frigg FCS.
An overview of the weights of the different installations as well as a their material content is given in table 1.
P.
177^.

Related Results

Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct Introduction Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Design, Installation, And Connection Of Subsea Lines On East Frigg Field
Design, Installation, And Connection Of Subsea Lines On East Frigg Field
ABSTRACT This paper describes the subsea network which interconnects the three subsea templates at EAST FRIGG field, and connects this field to the FRIGG field, 1...
North East Frigg Development and Experience
North East Frigg Development and Experience
Summary The North East Frigg (NEF) gas field is a small satellite of the Frigg field; in terms of recoverable reserves as estimated at the beginning of the projec...
Northeast Frigg Subsea Gas Production System
Northeast Frigg Subsea Gas Production System
Abstract The North East Frigg (NEF) gas reservoir is a small satellite of the giant Frigg gas field located in the North Sea in 100 meters of water. NEF gas reser...
Geomechanical Analysis of Caprock Integrity and Fault Stability for Greensand CO2 Storage Project Feasibility
Geomechanical Analysis of Caprock Integrity and Fault Stability for Greensand CO2 Storage Project Feasibility
ABSTRACT: A comprehensive geomechanical assessment is carried out to investigate the upper pressure limit of CO2 injection for the depleted Frigg Sand oil reservo...
Geomechanical Analysis of Caprock Integrity and Fault Stability for Greensand CO2 Storage Project Feasibility
Geomechanical Analysis of Caprock Integrity and Fault Stability for Greensand CO2 Storage Project Feasibility
Abstract A comprehensive geomechanical assessment is carried out to investigate the upper pressure limit of CO2 injection for the depleted oil Frigg Sand reservoir i...
Materialism and Environmental Knowledge as a Mediator for Relationships between Religiosity and Ethical Consumption
Materialism and Environmental Knowledge as a Mediator for Relationships between Religiosity and Ethical Consumption
ABSTRACTOn a global and regional scale, Indonesia has one of the least environmentally sustainable economies in the Asia-Pacific region. Consumption is one of the key factors contr...
Waste treating waste: Organic micropollutant removal from water by Agaricus bisporus spent mushroom substrate
Waste treating waste: Organic micropollutant removal from water by Agaricus bisporus spent mushroom substrate
The continual increase in domestic and industrial wastewater poses a significant challenge, as conventional wastewater treatment methods struggle to effectively remove persistent o...

Back to Top