Javascript must be enabled to continue!
An analytical study of Ne Win’s 1962 coup d’etat in Burma
View through CrossRef
Ne Win made military coup and usurped political power from civilian government in 1962. This coup and the period are significant in Myanmar’s modern history because more than forty years of military rule starting from the year resulted in the loss of political space for other political actors. Explanations for this period are still in vagueness and filled with confusion. The coup in 1962 was tried to be legitimized by claiming that it was the means of preventing the breakup of the Union. However, the military seemed to wait for taking political power. Some scholar’s works tried to point out the rift within the military, however, Ne Win’s role is not clear in that framework even though he is the only person who could lead the coup d’état. This thesis analyzed the causes of the coup from triggering motives and structural causes, in particular, focusing on the economic activities of the military before and after the coup related with the course of nationalization and the purge of an officer. Furthermore, the elite group of the military was examined with the pattern of purge as the group is the prominent political actor since War time Burma. Analyzing the mechanism of this coup with political actor, motives and historical structure, author tried to find ‘genes’ of coup d’état in Burma in order to have some hints for future prevention from the view point of rational state governance.This coup d’état was the result of the combination of triggering motives and structural causes. Those factors are intertwined and influenced upon each other. Emotional upheaval of Burmese ethnic nationalism stimulated through religious and federal issues sought for direction to flow out under the circumstances of the political power vacuum. Significantly, core officers group was keen in politics to and had experience of military operations for taking state power in the resistance movement for her independence.
Title: An analytical study of Ne Win’s 1962 coup d’etat in Burma
Description:
Ne Win made military coup and usurped political power from civilian government in 1962.
This coup and the period are significant in Myanmar’s modern history because more than forty years of military rule starting from the year resulted in the loss of political space for other political actors.
Explanations for this period are still in vagueness and filled with confusion.
The coup in 1962 was tried to be legitimized by claiming that it was the means of preventing the breakup of the Union.
However, the military seemed to wait for taking political power.
Some scholar’s works tried to point out the rift within the military, however, Ne Win’s role is not clear in that framework even though he is the only person who could lead the coup d’état.
This thesis analyzed the causes of the coup from triggering motives and structural causes, in particular, focusing on the economic activities of the military before and after the coup related with the course of nationalization and the purge of an officer.
Furthermore, the elite group of the military was examined with the pattern of purge as the group is the prominent political actor since War time Burma.
Analyzing the mechanism of this coup with political actor, motives and historical structure, author tried to find ‘genes’ of coup d’état in Burma in order to have some hints for future prevention from the view point of rational state governance.
This coup d’état was the result of the combination of triggering motives and structural causes.
Those factors are intertwined and influenced upon each other.
Emotional upheaval of Burmese ethnic nationalism stimulated through religious and federal issues sought for direction to flow out under the circumstances of the political power vacuum.
Significantly, core officers group was keen in politics to and had experience of military operations for taking state power in the resistance movement for her independence.
Related Results
Win-win-win papakonstantinidis social dilemma
Win-win-win papakonstantinidis social dilemma
Research ON THE EQUILIBRIUM between what is best for individuals and what is best for collectives has long been central to sociology and other social sciences (Simpson and Willer, ...
PSYCHOLOGICAL win-win-win
PSYCHOLOGICAL win-win-win
In a psychological order "win-win-win" indicates legitimate and certain principles of governance Introduces "superego" in place of "individualism"
From a psychological perspective...
Effects of WIN 55,212 cannabinoid and SMA-WIN 55,212 on the expression of cannabinoid receptors in different glioma cell lines.
Effects of WIN 55,212 cannabinoid and SMA-WIN 55,212 on the expression of cannabinoid receptors in different glioma cell lines.
Abstract
Background:
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly invasive primary malignancy of the brain that is prone to acquiring resistance to chemotherapy. Given the limited therap...
Sustainable TOURISM: win-win-win papakonstantinidis model
Sustainable TOURISM: win-win-win papakonstantinidis model
Tourism is considered by the three forms of its sustainability
• The economic sustainability
• The social sustainability
• The environmental sustainability
That corresponds 1-1 t...
How to develop a win-win-win-win business model
How to develop a win-win-win-win business model
How many of you want to have a win-win-win-win veterinary business? This is a win for the animals in your care, your producers, your veterinary business and you personally.
...
The Win-Win-Win Papakonstantinidis Model and the Economic MRS: Some Lessons From Linear B
The Win-Win-Win Papakonstantinidis Model and the Economic MRS: Some Lessons From Linear B
The suggested "win-win-win papakonstantinidis model" (coming from Nash1 win-win extended approach) tries to find ways for the three-pole bargaining conceptual equilibrium, under co...
Enhanced Cytotoxicity and Receptor Modulation by SMA-WIN 55,212-2 Micelles in Glioblastoma Cells
Enhanced Cytotoxicity and Receptor Modulation by SMA-WIN 55,212-2 Micelles in Glioblastoma Cells
Glioblastoma (GBM), a devastating brain malignancy, resists conventional therapies due to molecular heterogeneity and the blood–brain barrier’s significant restriction on drug deli...
Fuzzy Win-Win: A Novel Approach to Quantify Win-Win Using Fuzzy Logic
Fuzzy Win-Win: A Novel Approach to Quantify Win-Win Using Fuzzy Logic
Abstract
The classic win-win has a key flaw in that it cannot offer the parties with right amounts of winning because each party believes they are winners. In reality, one ...

