Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Responses to Spinoza: Burman to Le Clerc
View through CrossRef
Chapter 2 surveys early responses to Spinoza’s Tractatus theologico-politicus in the Dutch Republic. These include well-known published refutations, such as those by Regnerus van Mansveld (1674) and Frans Kuyper (1676), but also initiatives that never came to fruition, such as those of Jacobus Alting and Antonius Perizonius. Within these responses two main themes stand out: on the one hand, puzzlement at the metaphysics that implicitly underlies Spinoza’s terse biblical exegesis; on the other, indignation at his carefree employment of well-established philological methods in arguments that led to outrageous conclusions. Focussing on the latter, it is argued that a substantial part of the dismissive response to Spinoza was characterized by ‘scripturarianism’, the philological engagement with the biblical source texts in their original languages. Dutch scripturarians were unsettled, as their philological approach could be portrayed as leading to the highly unconventional biblical interpretations voiced by Spinoza and some of his eccentric contemporaries.
Title: Responses to Spinoza: Burman to Le Clerc
Description:
Chapter 2 surveys early responses to Spinoza’s Tractatus theologico-politicus in the Dutch Republic.
These include well-known published refutations, such as those by Regnerus van Mansveld (1674) and Frans Kuyper (1676), but also initiatives that never came to fruition, such as those of Jacobus Alting and Antonius Perizonius.
Within these responses two main themes stand out: on the one hand, puzzlement at the metaphysics that implicitly underlies Spinoza’s terse biblical exegesis; on the other, indignation at his carefree employment of well-established philological methods in arguments that led to outrageous conclusions.
Focussing on the latter, it is argued that a substantial part of the dismissive response to Spinoza was characterized by ‘scripturarianism’, the philological engagement with the biblical source texts in their original languages.
Dutch scripturarians were unsettled, as their philological approach could be portrayed as leading to the highly unconventional biblical interpretations voiced by Spinoza and some of his eccentric contemporaries.
Related Results
Spinoza’s Metaphysics of Modality
Spinoza’s Metaphysics of Modality
Chapter four argues that ignoring a fundamental explanatory question has led interpreters to misunderstand Spinoza’s views on necessity, contingency, possibility, and impossibility...
Spinoza’s Conceptualist Strategy
Spinoza’s Conceptualist Strategy
This chapter lays out in general terms how Spinoza uses the tools of conceptual sensitivity, variability, and identification to satisfy these competing desiderata of perfection. At...
Spinoza’s Biblical Criticism
Spinoza’s Biblical Criticism
Chapter 1 homes in on Spinoza as a Bible critic. Based on existing historiography, it parses the main relevant historical contexts in which Spinoza came to articulate his analysis ...
Introduction
Introduction
The introduction opens with a sketch of the state of contemporary Spinoza studies and argues that the time is ripe to return to Spinoza’s own self-described project of integrating ...
Elusive Individuals
Elusive Individuals
Spinoza’s conceptualist strategy was introduced to show how one and the same individual can be structured by a diversity of attributes, causal structures, dependence relations, mod...
From “Epicurean” Physics to Ethics
From “Epicurean” Physics to Ethics
This chapter discusses Baxter’s theory of natural law and his polemics against Thomas Hobbes and Benedict de Spinoza on ethical matters. Baxter’s natural law theory drew on Francis...
Ethics, Motivation, and Egoism
Ethics, Motivation, and Egoism
To show how this metaphysical machinery intersects with Spinoza’s ethics, chapter seven begins with a fresh account of what the author calls Spinoza’s psychological ethics, a serie...
Spinoza’s Hermeneutics
Spinoza’s Hermeneutics
The biblical scholarship Spinoza deploys in his Tractatus Theologico-Politicus (1670) stands in a long tradition of humanist philology. The radical thrust of the book lay not so mu...

