Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Rudolf Bultmann on Rudolf Otto

View through CrossRef
Rudolf Otto (1869–1937), well known for his book The Idea of the Holy, and Rudolf Bultmann (1884–1976), even more famous for his hermeneutical programs of demythologization and existential interpretation, had, according to Bultmann himself, “been friends at Breslau.” Although Bultmann admitted in 1969 with incorruptible fairness that “the calling of the systematic theologian Rudolf Otto was a great gain for the theological faculty at Marburg,” he also had to state that “Otto and I grew so far apart that our students, too, were aware of the antithesis between his work and mine.” Already ten years earlier, in his first autobiographical draft of 1959, Bultmann mentioned “tensions with R. Otto, Hermann's successor,” which “led to lively discussions” among the students at Marburg. Those tensions date back at least to the early twenties, as two letters of Bultmann to Karl Barth reveal. In the first letter, written at the end of 1922, Bultmann stigmatizes the notes of Otto to F. Schleiermacher's Reden, Über die Religion, as “totally misleading.” In a letter written in April 1927 Bultmann expresses the hope that the opposition at Marburg to the Swiss theologian Eduard Thurneysen might be overcome “in six months, when Otto will be in India.” Thurneysen belonged to the new movement of so-called Dialectical Theology.
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: Rudolf Bultmann on Rudolf Otto
Description:
Rudolf Otto (1869–1937), well known for his book The Idea of the Holy, and Rudolf Bultmann (1884–1976), even more famous for his hermeneutical programs of demythologization and existential interpretation, had, according to Bultmann himself, “been friends at Breslau.
” Although Bultmann admitted in 1969 with incorruptible fairness that “the calling of the systematic theologian Rudolf Otto was a great gain for the theological faculty at Marburg,” he also had to state that “Otto and I grew so far apart that our students, too, were aware of the antithesis between his work and mine.
” Already ten years earlier, in his first autobiographical draft of 1959, Bultmann mentioned “tensions with R.
Otto, Hermann's successor,” which “led to lively discussions” among the students at Marburg.
Those tensions date back at least to the early twenties, as two letters of Bultmann to Karl Barth reveal.
In the first letter, written at the end of 1922, Bultmann stigmatizes the notes of Otto to F.
Schleiermacher's Reden, Über die Religion, as “totally misleading.
” In a letter written in April 1927 Bultmann expresses the hope that the opposition at Marburg to the Swiss theologian Eduard Thurneysen might be overcome “in six months, when Otto will be in India.
” Thurneysen belonged to the new movement of so-called Dialectical Theology.

Related Results

Christelike etiek vanuit die perspektief van naasteliefde: Rudolf Bultmann en Stoïsynse etiek
Christelike etiek vanuit die perspektief van naasteliefde: Rudolf Bultmann en Stoïsynse etiek
Christian ethics from the perspective of neighbourly love: Rudolf Bultmann and Stoic ethics. This article consists of various sections. The first concerns a cultural-sensitive expl...
Bultmann, Rudolf (1884–1976)
Bultmann, Rudolf (1884–1976)
Rudolf Bultmann was one of the most influential Protestant theologians of the period that immediately followed the Second World War. A founding member of the school of dialectical ...
Rudolf Bultmann, Hans Jonas und die Marburger Hermeneutik
Rudolf Bultmann, Hans Jonas und die Marburger Hermeneutik
This review examines two volumes: The anthology on Hans Jonas and Marburghermeneutics edited by Malte Dominik Krüger and Andreas Großmann in 2023 andthe correspondence between Rudo...
»Der Wille als Tatwille ist von vornherein böse«
»Der Wille als Tatwille ist von vornherein böse«
Zusammenfassung Ausgehend von dem ihn selbst einst existentiell treffenden Diktum seines Lehrers: »Der Wille als Tatwille ist von vornherein böse« analysiert Marquar...
Interpretation, Not Repetition: Reflections on Bultmann as a Theological Reader of Paul
Interpretation, Not Repetition: Reflections on Bultmann as a Theological Reader of Paul
ABSTRACT Bultmann's Theology of the New Testament is instructive as a theological performance, which goes beyond redescription to theological explication. His readin...
The Significance of the Church for Theological Interpretation
The Significance of the Church for Theological Interpretation
ABSTRACT In this article, I seek to clarify the meaning of the church as a plausibility structure for theological interpretation of Scripture, a thesis I initially a...
Rezension von: Sennhauser, Hans Rudolf; Courvoisier, Hans Rudolf, Das Basler Münster
Rezension von: Sennhauser, Hans Rudolf; Courvoisier, Hans Rudolf, Das Basler Münster
Hans Rudolf Sennhauser / Hans Rudolf Courvoisier, Das Basler Münster. Die frühen Kathedralen und der Heinrichsdom, Ausgrabungen 1966, 1973/74 (Veröffentlichungen der Stiftung für F...
Bultmann Handbuch
Bultmann Handbuch
Guide to Bultmann....

Back to Top