Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Literacy, New Testament
View through CrossRef
Although various New Testament texts reflect the importance of literacy and illiteracy in early Christianity (for example, Mark 13:14; John 7:15; Acts 4:13; 8:30; 1 Corinthians 16:21), these issues have taken on greater significance in New Testament studies since the 1980s. This period witnessed an explosion of interdisciplinary research on ancient literacy and illiteracy in cognate disciplines such as classics, cultural anthropology, literary criticism, and media criticism. Cumulatively, these interdisciplinary studies have established a new and sustained scholarly majority opinion that most ancient persons were illiterate. As a result, New Testament scholars now see literacy and illiteracy as important factors for interpreting New Testament and early Christian texts in their socio-historical contexts, especially for understanding the diffusion of social power in the text-centered cultures of Second Temple Judaism and early Christianity. Such a perspective has breathed fresh life into old debates, such as the education of Jesus and his followers or the identity of Jewish scribes, and has introduced, or participated in, new perspectives, such as “performance criticism” and the “material turn” in studies of early Christian book culture. Most of these studies accept that the majority of the population in Second Temple Judaism and early Christianity was illiterate and proceed to understand the social consequences of the use of books and literate skills in a predominantly oral environment. Along these lines, further studies have increasingly come to indicate the overall inadequacy of the terms “literate” and “illiterate” for understanding the complex manifestations of literate skills in practice. Complicating factors include the facts that reading and writing skills were acquired and used separately, reading and writing skills existed in varying levels and varying languages even for an individual, and that literacy (the ability to access written tradition for oneself) should not be confused with textuality (the awareness and appreciation of written tradition). These factors and others have impacted New Testament scholars’ understanding of the authorship, reception, and circulation of texts in Second Temple Judaism and early Christianity.
Title: Literacy, New Testament
Description:
Although various New Testament texts reflect the importance of literacy and illiteracy in early Christianity (for example, Mark 13:14; John 7:15; Acts 4:13; 8:30; 1 Corinthians 16:21), these issues have taken on greater significance in New Testament studies since the 1980s.
This period witnessed an explosion of interdisciplinary research on ancient literacy and illiteracy in cognate disciplines such as classics, cultural anthropology, literary criticism, and media criticism.
Cumulatively, these interdisciplinary studies have established a new and sustained scholarly majority opinion that most ancient persons were illiterate.
As a result, New Testament scholars now see literacy and illiteracy as important factors for interpreting New Testament and early Christian texts in their socio-historical contexts, especially for understanding the diffusion of social power in the text-centered cultures of Second Temple Judaism and early Christianity.
Such a perspective has breathed fresh life into old debates, such as the education of Jesus and his followers or the identity of Jewish scribes, and has introduced, or participated in, new perspectives, such as “performance criticism” and the “material turn” in studies of early Christian book culture.
Most of these studies accept that the majority of the population in Second Temple Judaism and early Christianity was illiterate and proceed to understand the social consequences of the use of books and literate skills in a predominantly oral environment.
Along these lines, further studies have increasingly come to indicate the overall inadequacy of the terms “literate” and “illiterate” for understanding the complex manifestations of literate skills in practice.
Complicating factors include the facts that reading and writing skills were acquired and used separately, reading and writing skills existed in varying levels and varying languages even for an individual, and that literacy (the ability to access written tradition for oneself) should not be confused with textuality (the awareness and appreciation of written tradition).
These factors and others have impacted New Testament scholars’ understanding of the authorship, reception, and circulation of texts in Second Temple Judaism and early Christianity.
Related Results
Nova zaveza in slovenska literatura
Nova zaveza in slovenska literatura
The book is divided into two parts. The first part consists of a hermeneutical introduction which questions the possibility of viewing the New Testament and Slovene literature in a...
Studying the functional literacy of schoolchildren based on the use of educational content about Russia and Ethiopia: results of testing diagnostic tools
Studying the functional literacy of schoolchildren based on the use of educational content about Russia and Ethiopia: results of testing diagnostic tools
Introduction. In the context of developing cooperation between Russia and Ethiopia, projects are being implemented
that provide Ethiopian teachers and students with access to mode...
Digital literacy instruction in academic libraries in KwaZulu-Natal
Digital literacy instruction in academic libraries in KwaZulu-Natal
Information and Communications Technologies (ICTs) has become an integral tool in enhancing library services worldwide. ICT can be used as a tool for acquisition of digital literac...
Can earlier literacy skills have a negative impact on future home literacy activities? Evidence from Japanese
Can earlier literacy skills have a negative impact on future home literacy activities? Evidence from Japanese
We examined the cross‐lagged relations between the home literacy environment and literacy skills in Japanese, and whether child's gender, parents' education and child's level of li...
Literacy, Information, and Development in Morocco During The 1990s
Literacy, Information, and Development in Morocco During The 1990s
Literacy, Information, and Development in Morocco during the 1990s offers readers a two-level investigation of the culture of literacy. A handful of researchers approach literacy e...
Linking Contemporary Research on Youth, Literacy, and Popular Culture With Literacy Teacher Education
Linking Contemporary Research on Youth, Literacy, and Popular Culture With Literacy Teacher Education
The aim of this article is to expand the dialogue about how contemporary scholarship on the intersections between youth, literacy, and popular culture might inform literacy teacher...
Examining Communicative, Critical Health Literacy and eHealth Literacy among International University Students Residing in Japan
Examining Communicative, Critical Health Literacy and eHealth Literacy among International University Students Residing in Japan
(1) Background: International students with sufficient health literacy are better equipped to respond to public health emergencies and reduce any unintentional harm that may occur ...
The Effectiveness of Health Literacy Based Educational Intervention on Nutritional Outcomes of Elderly
The Effectiveness of Health Literacy Based Educational Intervention on Nutritional Outcomes of Elderly
Objectives: Health literacy is one of the most important social determinants of elderly health. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of the educational intervention on k...

