Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Adorno and Activism
View through CrossRef
Abstract
This chapter revisits Adorno’s ambivalence toward 1960s student activism in the context of his and the Frankfurt School’s extended grappling with the theory–practice dialectic. It locates, in Adorno’s mid-1960s lectures on History and Freedom, a firm reclamation of the enduring historical possibility of political spontaneity and intervention. The chapter offers several suggestions as to why Adorno nonetheless cast doubt on the efficacy of ongoing student activism with the argument that political practice was “blocked,” as well as what can be gained from Adorno’s robust defense of theory within the theory–practice dialectic. Yet it ultimately argues that, against his own skepticism and Cold War blinders, Adorno’s inchoate theory of moral-political action in the lectures obtained its nearest practical expression in the international solidarity that motivated the political movements of the era. To understand Adorno’s continued relevance for activism, this past historical-theoretical conjuncture requires further exploration.
Title: Adorno and Activism
Description:
Abstract
This chapter revisits Adorno’s ambivalence toward 1960s student activism in the context of his and the Frankfurt School’s extended grappling with the theory–practice dialectic.
It locates, in Adorno’s mid-1960s lectures on History and Freedom, a firm reclamation of the enduring historical possibility of political spontaneity and intervention.
The chapter offers several suggestions as to why Adorno nonetheless cast doubt on the efficacy of ongoing student activism with the argument that political practice was “blocked,” as well as what can be gained from Adorno’s robust defense of theory within the theory–practice dialectic.
Yet it ultimately argues that, against his own skepticism and Cold War blinders, Adorno’s inchoate theory of moral-political action in the lectures obtained its nearest practical expression in the international solidarity that motivated the political movements of the era.
To understand Adorno’s continued relevance for activism, this past historical-theoretical conjuncture requires further exploration.
Related Results
Adorno and Authoritarianism
Adorno and Authoritarianism
Abstract
The 2019 reissue of The Authoritarian Personality, to which Adorno contributed as part of a research team, has rejuvenated the critical conversation abou...
Adorno and Existentialism
Adorno and Existentialism
Abstract
True to the negative dialectical ethos of his philosophy, Adorno’s relationship to existentialism is both positive and negative without resolution. On th...
Adorno and Religion
Adorno and Religion
Abstract
This chapter explores the complex but meaningful role of religious ideas and theological arguments in Adorno’s thought. It examines how, alongside his cr...
The Affect of Dissident Language and Aesthetic Emancipation at the Margins: A Possible Dialogue between Theodor W. Adorno and Julia Kristeva
The Affect of Dissident Language and Aesthetic Emancipation at the Margins: A Possible Dialogue between Theodor W. Adorno and Julia Kristeva
In this paper I focus on the interaction between affect and language as articulated in the works of Theodor W. Adorno and Julia Kristeva, sometimes in inchoate and non-explicit way...
Adorno and Environmentalism
Adorno and Environmentalism
Abstract
Adorno often drew on nature images in composing the titles for his short vignettes in Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life (published in 1951). ...
Adorno, Marx, and abstract domination
Adorno, Marx, and abstract domination
This article reconstructs and defends Theodor Adorno’s social theory by motivating the central role of abstract domination within it. Whereas critics such as Axel Honneth have char...
Adorno’s Ethical Materialism
Adorno’s Ethical Materialism
Abstract
When scholars use the word “materialism,” in either a specifically Marxist or generally philosophical sense, the term is not applied in such a way that i...

