Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Adorno and Authoritarianism
View through CrossRef
Abstract
The 2019 reissue of The Authoritarian Personality, to which Adorno contributed as part of a research team, has rejuvenated the critical conversation about Adorno and authoritarianism at a time when Adorno’s concern about the potential for the United States to “slide into fascism” might be interpreted as prognostication. In particular, the new inclusion of Adorno’s critical “Remarks on The Authoritarian Personality,” omitted from the original publication of the text in 1950, works against the decades-old misinterpretation of the study as understanding authoritarianism to be a primarily psychological phenomenon—a misinterpretation that persists into the present in analyses that attribute too much causal and explanatory power to individuals’ dispositions in the genesis of authoritarianism, and emphasize the Fascist (F) scale’s applicability to contemporary right-wing demagogues. Adorno consistently maintained that the roots of “a fascistically inclined mentality … extend deep into the structure of [the] society that generates [it].” In this chapter, I revisit the complexities attendant upon Adorno’s participation in the AP study, given especially his conflictual relationship to American empirical research and his prediction that, in a society full of types, psychology would become obsolete. I critically explore contemporary engagements with Adorno on authoritarianism, ultimately arguing that Adorno’s own insistence on looking to the objective dimension of authoritarian tendencies invites acknowledgement of the limitations of his work in diagnosing antidemocratic trends today—particularly in the United States, due to his relative inattention to the arguably authoritarian history of anti-Black racism.
Title: Adorno and Authoritarianism
Description:
Abstract
The 2019 reissue of The Authoritarian Personality, to which Adorno contributed as part of a research team, has rejuvenated the critical conversation about Adorno and authoritarianism at a time when Adorno’s concern about the potential for the United States to “slide into fascism” might be interpreted as prognostication.
In particular, the new inclusion of Adorno’s critical “Remarks on The Authoritarian Personality,” omitted from the original publication of the text in 1950, works against the decades-old misinterpretation of the study as understanding authoritarianism to be a primarily psychological phenomenon—a misinterpretation that persists into the present in analyses that attribute too much causal and explanatory power to individuals’ dispositions in the genesis of authoritarianism, and emphasize the Fascist (F) scale’s applicability to contemporary right-wing demagogues.
Adorno consistently maintained that the roots of “a fascistically inclined mentality … extend deep into the structure of [the] society that generates [it].
” In this chapter, I revisit the complexities attendant upon Adorno’s participation in the AP study, given especially his conflictual relationship to American empirical research and his prediction that, in a society full of types, psychology would become obsolete.
I critically explore contemporary engagements with Adorno on authoritarianism, ultimately arguing that Adorno’s own insistence on looking to the objective dimension of authoritarian tendencies invites acknowledgement of the limitations of his work in diagnosing antidemocratic trends today—particularly in the United States, due to his relative inattention to the arguably authoritarian history of anti-Black racism.
Related Results
Adorno and Existentialism
Adorno and Existentialism
Abstract
True to the negative dialectical ethos of his philosophy, Adorno’s relationship to existentialism is both positive and negative without resolution. On th...
Adorno and Religion
Adorno and Religion
Abstract
This chapter explores the complex but meaningful role of religious ideas and theological arguments in Adorno’s thought. It examines how, alongside his cr...
The Affect of Dissident Language and Aesthetic Emancipation at the Margins: A Possible Dialogue between Theodor W. Adorno and Julia Kristeva
The Affect of Dissident Language and Aesthetic Emancipation at the Margins: A Possible Dialogue between Theodor W. Adorno and Julia Kristeva
In this paper I focus on the interaction between affect and language as articulated in the works of Theodor W. Adorno and Julia Kristeva, sometimes in inchoate and non-explicit way...
Adorno and Environmentalism
Adorno and Environmentalism
Abstract
Adorno often drew on nature images in composing the titles for his short vignettes in Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life (published in 1951). ...
Adorno and Activism
Adorno and Activism
Abstract
This chapter revisits Adorno’s ambivalence toward 1960s student activism in the context of his and the Frankfurt School’s extended grappling with the the...
Subjetividad y autoritarismo en la filosofía de la educación de Theodor W. Adorno
Subjetividad y autoritarismo en la filosofía de la educación de Theodor W. Adorno
This paper aims to discuss the relevance and the actuality of Theodor W. Adorno’s reflections on education. In this context, It shows that the central point of Adorno´s philosophy ...
Adorno, Marx, and abstract domination
Adorno, Marx, and abstract domination
This article reconstructs and defends Theodor Adorno’s social theory by motivating the central role of abstract domination within it. Whereas critics such as Axel Honneth have char...

