Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Domestic Architecture, Ancient Israel

View through CrossRef
Since the advent of agriculture, all humans have lived in built environments, and traditional societies typically produce living spaces that exhibit considerable uniformity. Domestic architecture, ancient Israel refers to the typical structures that housed most Israelite families in the Iron Age (c. 1200–587 bce). Although some house forms that existed in the pre-Israelite periods continued into the Iron Age, mainly in enclaves of non-Israelites, one house form came to dominate in settlements identified as Israelite. This type is called by various names. It was first identified as a rectangular space divided into three longitudinal spaces and, at the back, one horizontal space, creating four rooms; it was thus designated a “four-room house” (and more recently a “longitudinal four-space house”). However, as more excavated examples became known, it became clear that this house type had many variations, some having fewer than four rooms and many, especially when second stories are taken into account, having considerably more. Thus, because a row of pillars typically separates two of the longitudinal spaces, they are sometimes called “pillared” houses or “pillar-courtyard” houses. Either way, the location of courtyard space in these buildings is not clear. The function of these structures was not only to provide shelter from the elements or from enemies; it was also the workspace for many of the activities that were essential for the survival of the agriculturalists who comprised the great majority of the Israelite population. Houses served as places to sleep and eat and also to carry out basic economic functions: preparing food, making and using essential household items (e.g., textiles, pottery, baskets), and storing provisions and implements. They also were the settings for religious activities and local social and political as well as familial interactions. In addition, the organization of space in a dwelling probably embodied and communicated cultural values.
Oxford University Press
Title: Domestic Architecture, Ancient Israel
Description:
Since the advent of agriculture, all humans have lived in built environments, and traditional societies typically produce living spaces that exhibit considerable uniformity.
Domestic architecture, ancient Israel refers to the typical structures that housed most Israelite families in the Iron Age (c.
 1200–587 bce).
Although some house forms that existed in the pre-Israelite periods continued into the Iron Age, mainly in enclaves of non-Israelites, one house form came to dominate in settlements identified as Israelite.
This type is called by various names.
It was first identified as a rectangular space divided into three longitudinal spaces and, at the back, one horizontal space, creating four rooms; it was thus designated a “four-room house” (and more recently a “longitudinal four-space house”).
However, as more excavated examples became known, it became clear that this house type had many variations, some having fewer than four rooms and many, especially when second stories are taken into account, having considerably more.
Thus, because a row of pillars typically separates two of the longitudinal spaces, they are sometimes called “pillared” houses or “pillar-courtyard” houses.
Either way, the location of courtyard space in these buildings is not clear.
The function of these structures was not only to provide shelter from the elements or from enemies; it was also the workspace for many of the activities that were essential for the survival of the agriculturalists who comprised the great majority of the Israelite population.
Houses served as places to sleep and eat and also to carry out basic economic functions: preparing food, making and using essential household items (e.
g.
, textiles, pottery, baskets), and storing provisions and implements.
They also were the settings for religious activities and local social and political as well as familial interactions.
In addition, the organization of space in a dwelling probably embodied and communicated cultural values.

Related Results

The architecture of differences
The architecture of differences
Following in the footsteps of the protagonists of the Italian architectural debate is a mark of culture and proactivity. The synthesis deriving from the artistic-humanistic factors...
From Foes to Friends: The Normalization of the United Emirates Arab and Israel Relations
From Foes to Friends: The Normalization of the United Emirates Arab and Israel Relations
Abstract   This article aims to explain the reason the United Arab Emirates (UAE) normalized ties within Israel through Abraham Accord. The normalization of the UAE-Isr...
Fra Israels til palestinernes beste venn?
Fra Israels til palestinernes beste venn?
Etter 1948 var Norge en av Israels aller beste venner. Palestinernes skjebne vakte ingen interesse. De var glemt. Etter krigen i 1967 forandret disse holdningene seg. Israel var bl...
Time and Architecture
Time and Architecture
In the Italian language, the term “tempo” (literally time) is a word of daily use to which we attribute many meanings. It can signify a chronological dimension between past, prese...
Everyday Life in the "Tourist Zone"
Everyday Life in the "Tourist Zone"
This article makes a case for the everyday while on tour and argues that the ability to continue with everyday routines and social relationships, while at the same time moving thro...
Problematic aspects of criminal prosecution for domestic violence
Problematic aspects of criminal prosecution for domestic violence
mestic violence.The article is devoted to the analysis of the features of bringing criminal responsibility for committing domestic violence. It has been proven that the establishme...
FRAMING THE AL-AQSA MOSQUE ATTACKS
FRAMING THE AL-AQSA MOSQUE ATTACKS
ABSTRACT — This study examines the news reporting of the tragic events at the Al-Aqsa Mosque, focusing on the coverage of the Israeli armed forces’ assault on the mosque by three m...
In Quest of a Coherent Portrait of Paul: A Rejoinder to Michael Bird
In Quest of a Coherent Portrait of Paul: A Rejoinder to Michael Bird
AbstractThis rejoinder to Michael Bird’s critique of our argument in Joel Kaminsky and Mark Reasoner, “The Meaning and Telos of Israel’s Election: An Interfaith Response to N. T. W...

Back to Top