Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Peaceful Atom as Political Weapon: Euratom and American Foreign Policy in the Late 1950s

View through CrossRef
The U.S. emerged from World War II as the world's leading scientific and technological nation, consolidating its advantage for the next two or three decades. This paper describes how the State Department used the nation's dominance in the nuclear field, inherited from the Manhattan Project, to divert the resources of Western European states, notably France and Germany, into a civilian nuclear power program undertaken by a new supranational organization, Euratom. The determination on the continent to re-launch the European integration process in 1955, the Suez crisis in 1956, and the launch of the Sputniks in 1957 were opportunities ably exploited by officers in the State Department to use America's scientific, technological, and industrial depth in nuclear power as a political weapon. To this end they withheld the supply of enriched uranium for as long as possible from nations that wanted the fuel through bilateral agreements with the Atomic Energy Commission. In parallel they offered nuclear materials and know how, along with economic and political incentives, to encourage nations to commit to Euratom. This policy was strongly opposed by senior officials in the AEC and in the fledgling International Atomic Energy Agency, as well in Britain and in some continental countries, but to no avail. Though the State Department's efforts eventually bore little fruit, the paper clearly shows how U.S. leadership in science and technology was mobilized to promote America's foreign policy agenda in Western Europe in the early Cold War.
Title: The Peaceful Atom as Political Weapon: Euratom and American Foreign Policy in the Late 1950s
Description:
The U.
S.
emerged from World War II as the world's leading scientific and technological nation, consolidating its advantage for the next two or three decades.
This paper describes how the State Department used the nation's dominance in the nuclear field, inherited from the Manhattan Project, to divert the resources of Western European states, notably France and Germany, into a civilian nuclear power program undertaken by a new supranational organization, Euratom.
The determination on the continent to re-launch the European integration process in 1955, the Suez crisis in 1956, and the launch of the Sputniks in 1957 were opportunities ably exploited by officers in the State Department to use America's scientific, technological, and industrial depth in nuclear power as a political weapon.
To this end they withheld the supply of enriched uranium for as long as possible from nations that wanted the fuel through bilateral agreements with the Atomic Energy Commission.
In parallel they offered nuclear materials and know how, along with economic and political incentives, to encourage nations to commit to Euratom.
This policy was strongly opposed by senior officials in the AEC and in the fledgling International Atomic Energy Agency, as well in Britain and in some continental countries, but to no avail.
Though the State Department's efforts eventually bore little fruit, the paper clearly shows how U.
S.
leadership in science and technology was mobilized to promote America's foreign policy agenda in Western Europe in the early Cold War.

Related Results

The Origins of Euratom's Research on Controlled Thermonuclear Fusion: Cold War Politics and European Integration, 1958–1968
The Origins of Euratom's Research on Controlled Thermonuclear Fusion: Cold War Politics and European Integration, 1958–1968
The article traces the origins and early developments of European fusion research in the framework of Euratom and of postwar nuclear international institutionalism, and as an episo...
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
This report sets out the findings from one of four projects commissioned by Wellcome Policy Lab to pilot creative approaches to policy development. In this project, Scientia Script...
Responsibilised Resilience? Reworking Neoliberal Social Policy Texts
Responsibilised Resilience? Reworking Neoliberal Social Policy Texts
Introduction This essay begins with the premise that resilience, broadly defined as positive adaptation despite adversity (Garmezy and Rutter), and resilience building are importa...
Colecţia de iatagane a Muzeului Banatului Timişoara / The Yataghans Collection Of The Banat Museum
Colecţia de iatagane a Muzeului Banatului Timişoara / The Yataghans Collection Of The Banat Museum
! e yataghan falls into the category of large knives, usually presenting a curved blade, made of high quality steel. ! is kind of weapon consists of a single-edged blade, necessari...
Women in Australian Politics: Maintaining the Rage against the Political Machine
Women in Australian Politics: Maintaining the Rage against the Political Machine
Women in federal politics are under-represented today and always have been. At no time in the history of the federal parliament have women achieved equal representation with men. T...
Mazzinianesimo, fascismo, comunismo: l'itinerario politico di Delio Cantimori (1919-1943)
Mazzinianesimo, fascismo, comunismo: l'itinerario politico di Delio Cantimori (1919-1943)
Delio Cantimori (1904-1966) was one of the most important Italian historians of the twentieth century. His studies on sixteenth-century religious history, on Italian 'Jacobinism' a...
NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL STANDARTS OF RIGHT TO PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY
NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL STANDARTS OF RIGHT TO PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY
The article is devoted to problems of legal regulation and implementing the constitutional right of citizens to peaceful assembly in Ukraine. The authors represent the approaches o...

Back to Top