Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Invader Enthroned: The Indian Portraits of Nadir Shah and Their Local and British Collectors

View through CrossRef
The conquest of Delhi in 1739 shook India and stunned the world. Despite the horror of his invasion, Nadir Shah (r. 1736–47) was commemorated in dozens of portraits from across the subcontinent. Contemporary depictions of the Iranian conqueror align with his imperial rhetoric and the new aesthetic of his Indo-Persian realm, but the vast majority were created posthumously between the mid-eighteenth and mid-nineteenth centuries. More curious is the fact that many of them are inserted into dynastic portrait series of Mughal emperors even though Nadir Shah did not stay to rule. Why did local painters continue to glorify a foreign invader and plunderer for another century after his death? The motivations are further complicated by two very different groups of patrons and collectors—local and British elites in India. Nadir Shah’s defeat of Delhi empowered regional rulers and emboldened British imperialist ambitions. Their divergent perspectives and the roles they played in the viral circulation of Nadir Shah’s image across India form the core of this investigation.
University of Michigan Library
Title: Invader Enthroned: The Indian Portraits of Nadir Shah and Their Local and British Collectors
Description:
The conquest of Delhi in 1739 shook India and stunned the world.
Despite the horror of his invasion, Nadir Shah (r.
1736–47) was commemorated in dozens of portraits from across the subcontinent.
Contemporary depictions of the Iranian conqueror align with his imperial rhetoric and the new aesthetic of his Indo-Persian realm, but the vast majority were created posthumously between the mid-eighteenth and mid-nineteenth centuries.
More curious is the fact that many of them are inserted into dynastic portrait series of Mughal emperors even though Nadir Shah did not stay to rule.
Why did local painters continue to glorify a foreign invader and plunderer for another century after his death? The motivations are further complicated by two very different groups of patrons and collectors—local and British elites in India.
Nadir Shah’s defeat of Delhi empowered regional rulers and emboldened British imperialist ambitions.
Their divergent perspectives and the roles they played in the viral circulation of Nadir Shah’s image across India form the core of this investigation.

Related Results

Nadir Shah's determination to statehood
Nadir Shah's determination to statehood
The article "Nadir Shah's determination to statehood" is a scientific analysis of Nadir Shah's legacy of statehood, his historical perspectives, and state-building resources in gen...
Ice cloud depolarization for nadir and off‐nadir CALIPSO measurements
Ice cloud depolarization for nadir and off‐nadir CALIPSO measurements
Currently approaching its sixth year in space, the CALIPSO satellite collects lidar linear depolarization ratios δ from 0.532 μm laser backscatter, an indicator of particle phase, ...
Explaining Nadir Shah: Kingship and Royal Legitimacy in Muhammad Kazim Marvi's Tārīkh-i ‘ālam-ārā-yi Nādirī
Explaining Nadir Shah: Kingship and Royal Legitimacy in Muhammad Kazim Marvi's Tārīkh-i ‘ālam-ārā-yi Nādirī
One of the most important contemporary Persian prose chronicles of Nadir Shah's life is the Tārīkh-i ‘ālam-ārā-yi Nādirī (The World-Illuminating History of Nadir). Its author, Muha...
Nadir Shah Afshar’s Policy towards the Armenian Community
Nadir Shah Afshar’s Policy towards the Armenian Community
Abstract Based on the primary sources, the article examined the position and status of the Christian population during the reign of Nadir Shah Afshar (1688–1747). Special atten...
Anatomy of a Massacre
Anatomy of a Massacre
Abstract In 1739, the Iranian ruler Nadir Shah spearheaded a rapid invasion of the Mughal realm, which culminated with his occupation of the Mughal capital of Shahja...

Back to Top