Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Textual History of the Books of Kings

View through CrossRef
Abstract The Septuagint (LXX) edition of Kings differs significantly from the Masoretic Text. These differences stem from a different Hebrew base text of the LXX (Vorlage). The LXX edition lacks many textual units added later through protomasoretic editing, but it also contains lengthy textual units not found in the Masoretic Text. Many verses and passages are transposed. Scholarly positions as to which edition has precedent have been highly polarized: while some believe that the LXX is the oldest preserved edition of Kings, others find its text secondary to the Masoretic Text. This question of the textual history and growth of the books of Kings has become one of the most pressing subjects in the contemporary study of Kings. This chapter discusses the methodological repercussions of this textual multiplicity for the study of Kings and gives examples of the major differences between the two extant editions.
Title: Textual History of the Books of Kings
Description:
Abstract The Septuagint (LXX) edition of Kings differs significantly from the Masoretic Text.
These differences stem from a different Hebrew base text of the LXX (Vorlage).
The LXX edition lacks many textual units added later through protomasoretic editing, but it also contains lengthy textual units not found in the Masoretic Text.
Many verses and passages are transposed.
Scholarly positions as to which edition has precedent have been highly polarized: while some believe that the LXX is the oldest preserved edition of Kings, others find its text secondary to the Masoretic Text.
This question of the textual history and growth of the books of Kings has become one of the most pressing subjects in the contemporary study of Kings.
This chapter discusses the methodological repercussions of this textual multiplicity for the study of Kings and gives examples of the major differences between the two extant editions.

Related Results

The Language of the Books of Kings
The Language of the Books of Kings
Abstract A major topic of discussion in recent scholarship on the books of Kings is whether the language of Kings can be used in tracing the diachronic development o...
The Books of Kings and Chronicles
The Books of Kings and Chronicles
Abstract The book of Chronicles contains material found in the Torah and Former Prophets. The most significant overlapping material is with Kings. The exact version ...
Kings’ Sagas
Kings’ Sagas
The Norse-Icelandic kings’ sagas originated in the 12th century, reached their zenith in the 13th century, and then kept being amplified and rewritten into new compilations through...
Kings and books in Anglo-Saxon England
Kings and books in Anglo-Saxon England
AbstractThis article examines the evidence for books associated with kings in Anglo-Saxon England, making the case for the ninth century as the key period of change. A wide variety...
Cult Centralization in the Books of Kings
Cult Centralization in the Books of Kings
Abstract The books of Kings claim that the worship of Yhwh should have been centralized at Solomon’s temple in Jerusalem and that, for most of their history, Israel ...
Prophecy in the Books of Kings
Prophecy in the Books of Kings
Abstract This chapter investigates the role of prophecy in the books of Kings and prophecy’s literary purpose in the larger context of the so-called Deuteronomistic ...
The Oxford Handbook of the Books of Kings
The Oxford Handbook of the Books of Kings
Abstract A premier reference work for the study of the Books of Kings, this volume provides a clear and useful introduction to the main aspects and issues pertaining...
Greek Versions of the Books of Kings
Greek Versions of the Books of Kings
Abstract This chapter discusses the Greek versions of the books of Kings. It begins with a description of the importance of the Qumran manuscripts and their discover...

Back to Top